Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ninga

(8,274 posts)
Mon Sep 21, 2020, 11:12 AM Sep 2020

"We could have done more"....

A long sad, detailed article from the Atlantic reporting on an interview with Andrew Weissman discussing his new book “Where The Law Ends.”

Weissman, was one of Robert Mueller’s top deputies.


-snip-
And Mueller? He was incapable of navigating the world remade by Trump. He conducted himself with scrupulous integrity and allowed his team to be intimidated by people who had no scruples at all. His deep aversion to publicity silenced him when the public badly needed clarity about the special counsel’s dense, ambiguous, at times unreadable report. His sense of fairness surrendered the facts of presidential criminality to an administration that was at war with facts. He trusted his friend Barr to play it straight, not realizing that Barr had gone crooked. He left the job of holding the president accountable to a Congress that had shown itself to be Trump’s willing accomplice. He wanted, above all, to warn the American people about foreign subversion of our democracy, while the greater subversion gathered force here at home.

In our interview, I asked Weissmann if Mueller had let the American people down. “Absolutely, yep,” Weissmann said, before quickly adding: “I wouldn’t phrase it as just Mueller. I would say ‘the office.’ There are a lot of things we did well, and a lot of things we could have done better, to be diplomatic about it.”

And the investigation—was it a historic missed opportunity?

Weissmann’s reply was terse. “That’s fair.”

With the end of the Special Counsel’s Office, the one real check on Trump’s unfettered power was gone, until the next election. Now it’s upon us, and the president remains free to repeat what worked for him in the last one.


https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/09/andrew-weissmann-mueller-book-where-law-ends/616395/




6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

CrispyQ

(36,437 posts)
1. "He trusted his friend Barr to play it straight, not realizing that Barr had gone crooked."
Mon Sep 21, 2020, 11:22 AM
Sep 2020

Seriously? My assessment? Mueller was not up for the job of going after fellow republicans, even shitholes like the Con.

brush

(53,759 posts)
4. I don't think Mueller realized that the Republican party was taken over by trump...
Mon Sep 21, 2020, 11:37 AM
Sep 2020

and they were all complicit in his treachery. Too bad. Once we saw Mueller testify it was obvious he wasn't the on-top-of-it, effective investigator he once was. I wonder if that was the reason he was chosen? Whose idea was it to pick Mueller?

brush

(53,759 posts)
2. And I remember we all had great faith that Mueller was the cavalry coming to the rescue.
Mon Sep 21, 2020, 11:31 AM
Sep 2020

Seems Mueller was an honorable man who trusted Barr, a dishonorable skank out to save trump's traitorous ass.

soothsayer

(38,601 posts)
5. I told "Nosey" Bob Mueller not to look into my Russian financial dealings because he wouldn't find
Mon Sep 21, 2020, 11:37 AM
Sep 2020

?s=21


?s=21


Donald J. Drumpf
@RealDonalDrumpf
I WAS ALMOST, NEARLY, NOT QUITE TOTALLY EXONERATED BY AN INCOMPLETE INVESTIGATION THAT I OBSTRUCTED AT EVERY STEP! ISN'T THAT WHAT YOU EXPECT FROM A LAW AND ORDER PRESIDENT?


Donald J. Drumpf
@RealDonalDrumpf
I told "Nosey" Bob Mueller not to look into my Russian financial dealings because he wouldn't find anything, so he decided not to look.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"We could have done more"...