Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis is what happened when Mueller's team subpoenaed @DeutscheBank in 2017. Angry White House reacti
Link to tweet
?s=21
David Enrich
@davidenrich
This is what happened when Muellers team subpoenaed @DeutscheBank in 2017. Angry White House reaction led prosecutors to back off. https://nytimes.com/2020/09/21/us/politics/andrew-weissmann-mueller.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1430 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (25)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This is what happened when Mueller's team subpoenaed @DeutscheBank in 2017. Angry White House reacti (Original Post)
soothsayer
Sep 2020
OP
Under The Radar
(3,401 posts)1. This makes no sense. The Muelker team was called the '27 Yankees
....the best of Group of prosecutors ever assembled coving all positions, money laundering, financial fraud, counterintelligence, cover crimes, obstruction of justice....Top notch, best in the business.
Before Barr took office, the reports were damaging and cutting deep into the Trump Org, White House staff, and disruptions in Trumps legal team and White House council.
Barr shows up and everything stops
Why would he go through the trouble to set up a team, gather so much evidence just to a surface inspection and not a real investigation.
This report by Weissmann on makes this GW more confusing, and appears to be covering up What I believe is Barrs interference.
iluvtennis
(19,832 posts)2. Both Rod Rosenstein's covert/subtle interference and Barr's. nt
kentuck
(111,051 posts)3. Remember how it was forbidden to criticize Mueller in those days.
Nobody could get over on him.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)4. It's a peculiar thing about a criminal investigation
The criminals don't like it very much.