Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

grobertj

(187 posts)
Tue Sep 22, 2020, 08:15 PM Sep 2020

Assuming the Dems take the Senate and the conservatives are a majority of the SC, we should...

eliminate the filibuster and pass Medicare for All. Since it's likely ACA will be ruled unconstitutional, we have no choice but to institute a single payer plan. How in the world could the SC rule that Medicare for All is unconstitutional. Medicare has been around for 80 years and has gradually been expanded to more people.

25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Assuming the Dems take the Senate and the conservatives are a majority of the SC, we should... (Original Post) grobertj Sep 2020 OP
that would be the move drray23 Sep 2020 #1
First maybe drop the eligibility age? Thekaspervote Sep 2020 #2
Yea...to 1 day old!! grobertj Sep 2020 #3
Hear! Hear! Laelth Sep 2020 #4
I like it!! The original unemployment insurance was basically the same thing. And it worked. grobertj Sep 2020 #6
Of course, it worked. Laelth Sep 2020 #23
Not convinced ACA will be ruled unconstitutional. That could have been done years Hoyt Sep 2020 #5
They will keep adding idiots until it happens RhodeIslandOne Sep 2020 #7
I hope you're right, but I fear you're wrong. grobertj Sep 2020 #8
The appeals court has already ruled that the ACA is unconstitutional. Laelth Sep 2020 #11
I think they ruled the mandate unconstitutional. That's totally different from remaining Hoyt Sep 2020 #18
I certainly hope so. Laelth Sep 2020 #22
I agree Hoyt, at least based on the current case before the SC. Roe however, is on very shaky still_one Sep 2020 #14
I am hoping it falls that way too. Sometimes the right wing justices surprise us. Hoyt Sep 2020 #20
Weird as it is there are conservatives who take the Bill of Rights seriously. Justice Black ... marble falls Sep 2020 #21
That is the example used most often still_one Sep 2020 #25
I hope that happens too still_one Sep 2020 #24
Medicare has been around more like 50 years, not 80 years, and I wouldn't be so sure that they still_one Sep 2020 #9
If they ruled Medicare and Social Security, protestors would storm the SC! grobertj Sep 2020 #10
We must expand the court. diane in sf Sep 2020 #12
We're going to have to find a historical linguist who can word the bills Baitball Blogger Sep 2020 #13
WE Were Thinking The Same Thing At The Same Time Me. Sep 2020 #16
LOL! Baitball Blogger Sep 2020 #17
If THe DEms Take The Senate & Still Have The House Me. Sep 2020 #15
No , Medicare for all is mostly a slogan right now. JI7 Sep 2020 #19

grobertj

(187 posts)
6. I like it!! The original unemployment insurance was basically the same thing. And it worked.
Tue Sep 22, 2020, 08:23 PM
Sep 2020

Family savings increased, and it stopped the bleeding from Covid.

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
23. Of course, it worked.
Tue Sep 22, 2020, 09:13 PM
Sep 2020

If the poor people have money, they will spend it. That, in turn, will churn the entire economy, and we will all be richer.

-Laelth

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
5. Not convinced ACA will be ruled unconstitutional. That could have been done years
Tue Sep 22, 2020, 08:23 PM
Sep 2020

ago. Definitely a concern, but not a given.

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
11. The appeals court has already ruled that the ACA is unconstitutional.
Tue Sep 22, 2020, 08:30 PM
Sep 2020

Unless the SCOTUS reverses that decision (with a 5-3 or 6-3 Republican majority currently seated), the ACA is gone ... kaput ... sayonara.



-Laelth

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
18. I think they ruled the mandate unconstitutional. That's totally different from remaining
Tue Sep 22, 2020, 08:36 PM
Sep 2020

ACA provisions.

Even the Cato Institute has asked the SC not to dismantle ACA. I believe they’ll come up with something.

https://www.cato.org/blog/new-obamacare-case-supreme-court-cant-strike-down-whole-law-should-still-grant-relief

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
22. I certainly hope so.
Tue Sep 22, 2020, 08:54 PM
Sep 2020

Last edited Wed Sep 23, 2020, 10:59 AM - Edit history (1)

Chief Justice Roberts has creatively found a way to rule that the ACA is constitutional three times at this point, but he had RBG voting with him in those cases. The Court is different, now, and, truth be told, the ACA probably isn’t constitutional if it isn’t a tax (and the mandate is what made it a tax according to Roberts).

We’ll see.

-Laelth

still_one

(92,061 posts)
14. I agree Hoyt, at least based on the current case before the SC. Roe however, is on very shaky
Tue Sep 22, 2020, 08:32 PM
Sep 2020

ground with the new makeup of the coming SC. What it will do is make it a state issue, and states like California will still allow a woman’s right to choose

If we are able to take the Senate, House, and WH though, we can legislate the equivalent of Roe at the Federal level

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
20. I am hoping it falls that way too. Sometimes the right wing justices surprise us.
Tue Sep 22, 2020, 08:39 PM
Sep 2020

They still suck, but throw us a bone every now and then.

marble falls

(57,013 posts)
21. Weird as it is there are conservatives who take the Bill of Rights seriously. Justice Black ...
Tue Sep 22, 2020, 08:46 PM
Sep 2020

turned himself around:

A U.S. Supreme Court justice was in the Ku Klux Klan—and ...
[Search domain timeline.com/hugo-black-justice-klan-4877fcf6ac75] https://timeline.com/hugo-black-justice-klan-4877fcf6ac75

Hugo Black had been associate justice of the Supreme Court for less than a month when the news broke. In September of 1937, an exposé by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette found proof of Black's membership in the Ku Klux Klan. He had joined in September of 1923, and resigned in July, 1925, as one of his first moves before running for one of Alabama's U.S. Senate seat.

still_one

(92,061 posts)
9. Medicare has been around more like 50 years, not 80 years, and I wouldn't be so sure that they
Tue Sep 22, 2020, 08:25 PM
Sep 2020

would not try to rule Medicare and Social Security as “unconstitutional”


That being said, if we regain the Senate, House, and White House, nothing should be off the table, including the impeachment of SC court judges, increasing the number of SC court judges, making Washington DC and Puerto Rico states, and a host of other issues gained by removing the filibuster


Baitball Blogger

(46,684 posts)
13. We're going to have to find a historical linguist who can word the bills
Tue Sep 22, 2020, 08:32 PM
Sep 2020

in a way that is ironclad for conservatives who take issue with any word that originated after 1958.

Me.

(35,454 posts)
15. If THe DEms Take The Senate & Still Have The House
Tue Sep 22, 2020, 08:34 PM
Sep 2020

Ironclad laws must be passed protecting Obamacare and reproductive right..

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Assuming the Dems take th...