General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAssuming the Dems take the Senate and the conservatives are a majority of the SC, we should...
eliminate the filibuster and pass Medicare for All. Since it's likely ACA will be ruled unconstitutional, we have no choice but to institute a single payer plan. How in the world could the SC rule that Medicare for All is unconstitutional. Medicare has been around for 80 years and has gradually been expanded to more people.
drray23
(7,616 posts)it would also enrage the repubs which is a nice bonus.
Thekaspervote
(32,709 posts)grobertj
(187 posts)Laelth
(32,017 posts)Give us the UBI too. Germanys doing it. Why not?
https://www.nationofchange.org/2020/09/21/germany-begins-trial-for-universal-basic-income/
-Laelth
grobertj
(187 posts)Family savings increased, and it stopped the bleeding from Covid.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)If the poor people have money, they will spend it. That, in turn, will churn the entire economy, and we will all be richer.
-Laelth
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)ago. Definitely a concern, but not a given.
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)And Amy Creepy Barrett is that kind of idiot.
grobertj
(187 posts)Laelth
(32,017 posts)Unless the SCOTUS reverses that decision (with a 5-3 or 6-3 Republican majority currently seated), the ACA is gone ... kaput ... sayonara.
-Laelth
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)ACA provisions.
Even the Cato Institute has asked the SC not to dismantle ACA. I believe theyll come up with something.
https://www.cato.org/blog/new-obamacare-case-supreme-court-cant-strike-down-whole-law-should-still-grant-relief
Laelth
(32,017 posts)Last edited Wed Sep 23, 2020, 10:59 AM - Edit history (1)
Chief Justice Roberts has creatively found a way to rule that the ACA is constitutional three times at this point, but he had RBG voting with him in those cases. The Court is different, now, and, truth be told, the ACA probably isnt constitutional if it isnt a tax (and the mandate is what made it a tax according to Roberts).
Well see.
-Laelth
still_one
(92,061 posts)ground with the new makeup of the coming SC. What it will do is make it a state issue, and states like California will still allow a womans right to choose
If we are able to take the Senate, House, and WH though, we can legislate the equivalent of Roe at the Federal level
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)They still suck, but throw us a bone every now and then.
marble falls
(57,013 posts)turned himself around:
A U.S. Supreme Court justice was in the Ku Klux Klanand ...
[Search domain timeline.com/hugo-black-justice-klan-4877fcf6ac75] https://timeline.com/hugo-black-justice-klan-4877fcf6ac75
Hugo Black had been associate justice of the Supreme Court for less than a month when the news broke. In September of 1937, an exposé by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette found proof of Black's membership in the Ku Klux Klan. He had joined in September of 1923, and resigned in July, 1925, as one of his first moves before running for one of Alabama's U.S. Senate seat.
still_one
(92,061 posts)still_one
(92,061 posts)still_one
(92,061 posts)would not try to rule Medicare and Social Security as unconstitutional
That being said, if we regain the Senate, House, and White House, nothing should be off the table, including the impeachment of SC court judges, increasing the number of SC court judges, making Washington DC and Puerto Rico states, and a host of other issues gained by removing the filibuster
grobertj
(187 posts)diane in sf
(3,913 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,684 posts)in a way that is ironclad for conservatives who take issue with any word that originated after 1958.
Me.
(35,454 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,684 posts)Me.
(35,454 posts)Ironclad laws must be passed protecting Obamacare and reproductive right..