General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump's SCOTUS front-runner Amy Barrett is in a 'cult' -- according to an ex-member who 'experienced
Transcript
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.org, The Quarantine Report. Im Amy Goodman, with Juan González, as we continue to look at the background of Judge Amy Coney Barrett, the apparent front-runner to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court. President Trump said hell announce a nominee on Saturday. Mitch McConnell appears to have the 51 votes he needs in the Senate to force a confirmation vote through before the election.
Were looking at Amy Barretts membership in a secretive Catholic group with rigid gender roles and a lifelong loyalty oath. Were now joined by a former of People of Praise whos now speaking out against the group. Coral Anika Theill was a People of Praise member for five years, from 1979 to 1984, after being forced to join the organization by her then-husband. She documented her experience in her memoir titled Bonsheá: Making Light of the Dark.
Coral, thanks so much for joining us from Corvallis, Oregon. Can you describe People of Praise and what happened to you while you lived in the community?
CORAL ANIKA THEILL: Thank you for having me on your show, and Im a fan of you and your show.
I was a member of the People of Praise many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult in Corvallis, Oregon. I experienced abuse and torture by my husband, Marty Warner, Independence, Oregon, and the cult leaders, as well as shunning, shaming and a smear campaign against me when I escaped and left. For safety, I legally changed my name, and Ive lived under a state address protection program from my ex-husband for the past 20 years.
Even though I left the People of Praise cult, I didnt have any rights, due to being married to my husband, who was a cult member. I was under the authority of my husband and his authoritarian head, Ed Brown. Under their authority, I was forced to attend meetings, but because I had defied leadership and their authority, I was forced to sit on the floor outside of their meetings in the hallway at the St. Marys Catholic Church. Theres dozens of witnesses that have seen how I was treated. What I would ask listeners to consider, even though they say this is a healthy group, to consider how I was treated and if this would be correct for Amy Barrett to be treated.
One time I had a miscarriage in 1984, and I had to have a D&C surgery. After I returned from the hospital, I was forced to attend a People of Praise womens meeting, or handmaidens meetings. I had a head that was also woman, besides my husband. They wanted to go shopping, and I couldnt, due to returning from surgery and feeling weak. I left the meeting to go home and rest, as my doctor had ordered. I was met by my husband and forced into the car, kidnapped against my will, where I was driven to the cult leaders home. I was interrogated until wee hours of the morning and psychologically abused. The next morning, the community was informed to shun me. I would never allow anyone to treat me this way today, and it traumatizes me to admit this was my life at that time.
JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Well, Coral, I wanted to ask you in terms of some of the hair-raising descriptions in your memoir of what happened to you, I wanted to ask you if you could talk about some of those. You talk about the situation where the head, that was assigned to you and your husband, wanted to see the family budget, that he told you how many hours per day you could spend on particular chores, including two to four loads of laundry a day, this meddling directly in the day-to-day in your day-to-day life and affairs with you and your family, and that you also mention that once you decided that you wanted to leave, that they threatened to try to have you committed to a mental institution?
CORAL ANIKA THEILL: They would call me mentally ill. And there was a time they had me under special counseling, under Father Charles Harris, who was the head leader of the Corvallis People of Praise branch. He was from South Bend.
But basically, there was just cruelty and bullying, and it was not much difference than the Jim Jones cult. I shared with Heidi that my story is very much like The Handmaids Tale series and the Netflix series 10-part documentary The Keepers.
Other things, yeah, there was always a list on my wall, a schedule, and men from the community would come unannounced to check on me to make sure I was on schedule and had done my chores. There was basically no privacy. And all of your personal anything personal was given to your husbands head also. I wasnt allowed contraceptives and was supposed to have all the children God intended for me, no matter what my health was. I had had eight children and three miscarriages and D&C, often when my health was failing.
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/09/trumps-scotus-front-runner-amy-barrett-is-in-a-cult-according-to-an-ex-member-who-experienced-abuse-and-torture/
BlueTsunami2018
(3,490 posts)And they all seem to have have cults within the chosen cult. They get nuttier as you get deeper.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)AnotherMother4Peace
(4,241 posts)NameAlreadyTaken
(977 posts)It is the foundation of religion.
FreeState
(10,570 posts)I disagree - Cults have trademark control methods that are not in other faith organizations.
The Bite Model: https://freedomofmind.com/bite-model/
Many people think of mind control as an ambiguous, mystical process that cannot be defined in concrete terms. In reality, mind control refers to a specific set of methods and techniques, such as hypnosis or thought-stopping, that influence how a person thinks, feels, and acts.
Based on research and theory by Robert Jay Lifton, Margaret Singer, Edgar Schein, Louis Jolyon West, and others who studied brainwashing in Maoist China as well as cognitive dissonance theory by Leon Festinger, Steven Hassan developed the BITE Model to describe the specific methods that cults use to recruit and maintain control over people. BITE stands for Behavior, Information, Thought, and Emotional control.
Behavior Control
Information Control
Thought Control
Emotional Control
panader0
(25,816 posts)There are more than 1000 religions and a person in one considers all the rest to be infidels.
The history of war is the same as religion.
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)Rule of Claw
(500 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)They're already setting up the narrative that the Democrats are attacking her Catholic faith. That's not needed.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)was based on this. It needs exposure.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Frankly, I sometimes wonder if liberals have any optics sense whatsoever or if they're just purposely dumb when it comes to shit like this.
The last thing we want is this debate to be about her religion. Not only is it not going to matter in the long run, it will seriously impact Biden's hopes in November.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)group repugnant and an insult to the Catholic church. This is a post on a Democratic forum. I really doubt Senate members will be questioning her about it.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Especially in the states Trump won in 2016 that Obama carried in 2012. If you feel this is a winning issue, fine. But don't get upset when you start seeing people question whether the Democratic are going after her Catholic faith.
FBaggins
(26,727 posts)It was a different group.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)FBaggins
(26,727 posts)The Catholic World Report in 2013 reported that 160 million Catholics were part of the movement (not this group... charismatic renewal in general)
https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2013/05/18/the-charismatic-renewal-and-the-catholic-church/
That's somewhere in the 10-15% of Catholics range (likely most outside the US - but that's just my guess).
I'd say that most Catholics would find the worship style to be odd... but most protestants would also be uncomfortable in a pentacostal service. "Crazy" is probably a stretch. "Cult" certainly is.
There's also a pretty wide range in the spectrum of "charismatic" throughout and within various denominations that ranges from not much more than "raise their hands during worship" to "rolling around the floor and oinking like pigs". I haven't seen anything giving specifics of this group (or even if it's consistent from one location to another).
FBaggins
(26,727 posts)Questioning on her religion three years ago appeared to backfire.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)the Senate. Neither does Amy Goodman. This isn't an "approach". Americans are entitled to know the background of the nutjobs being put forth for the Supreme Court. Should we all stick our heads in the sand and be quiet about it?
RANDYWILDMAN
(2,667 posts)The repubs will still confirm her...cause they are nuts and one of their nuts is better then a sane rational thoughtful person from our side.
VarryOn
(2,343 posts)Being called a cult member might not be the worst designation in the world, but I still dont like it. Lots of good Democrats are religious, with Catholicism probably the most popular (admittedly a guess on my part).
Im biased on this topic and most my friends are religious, with not all being hardcore Democrats. I dont relish the certain anti-Catholic rhetoric we will hear if the nominee is ACB or BL. It will not appeal to many, especially independents.
And Trump supports will ride our supposed anti-religious rhetoric like a dime store pony. Trump knows that many on our side wont be able to help themselves.
Rule of Claw
(500 posts)People of Praise is charismatic, a whole other level of "dedicated."
But ya, if she is actively subverting her own agency to her husband, that is as Joe would say, a BFD.
And it all comes out, we don't have to say anything.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)experienced nothing like this. In fact, this cult is an insult to the Catholic church.
FBaggins
(26,727 posts)If you watch the interview, you'll note that she speaks of being under her husband's control for the entire 20-year marriage (when they were only in the group for five years). Given the blowback on prior attempts to make a big deal of her Catholicism... we would need something much closer to her own experience (not someone in another state from when she was 12(?).
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)I believe I read that the majority of Justices on the Supreme Court are Catholic. That's not an issue . This is a deeply misogynistic, abusive cult.
FBaggins
(26,727 posts)It's really another woman's experience from decades ago. It really isn't evidence for "her background" even if it were true (which we can't know).
Similar stories of abuse exist for mainstream churches... for kids who grew up homeschooled... etc. etc. - but that's a far shot from being able to use their experiences as evidence for treatment of others.
VarryOn
(2,343 posts)That needed addressing.
Certainly, there are cult...probably in every religion.
For the next few weeks, though, if we want to win, we need to ix-nay the atholic-Cay ashing-bay.
And no, Im not Catholic.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)issue.
VarryOn
(2,343 posts)Its the Democratic Senators at the confirmation hearings that concern me. Few Senators on either side come across looking very well, and invariably an all-day affair can be boiled down to about one minute of sound bites. And nothing is learned, and no minds are changes. The best we can hope for is the nominee slips up and admits what they really think. Things are too scripted to reveal anything of value. Im almost of the opinion they shouldnt happen.
AnotherMother4Peace
(4,241 posts)It's a frugging cult disguised as a religion, just like People of Praise. The GOP is really laying the groundwork to defend this candidate's "religion".
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Especially to a lay group
FBaggins
(26,727 posts)Their site explicitly denies that an oath (let alone a lifetime loyalty oath) is involved.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)That woman too. Doesnt mean it didnt happen
FBaggins
(26,727 posts)If she was kidnapped she would have a legal claim against them. Did I miss the arrests in the article?
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Babbling incoherent bullshit calling it tongues when Catholicism teaches a very different meaning to the gift of tongues.
This is not Orthodox teaching at all. It is a weird attempt to reconcile Catholicism with the fringe Protestantism. It fails. It is not Sacred Tradition and has no place in the Church.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Do you not know the definition?
Fuck. We are done. Its right there are you are calling that woman a liar
gopiscrap
(23,733 posts)BlueNProud
(1,048 posts)If this woman is nominated she will be confirmed. All this will do is allow her to be a "victim of religious bigotry". Go after her on her legal record by all means but this avenue is not strategically sound.
ret5hd
(20,489 posts)Whew! Dodged a bullet there!
niyad
(113,216 posts)PaulRevere08
(449 posts)All have ties to the federalist society and Leonard Leo:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/investigations/leonard-leo-federalists-society-courts/
It's very scary how conservative catholic lawyers have penetrated both the courts and law schools. A noted catholic integralist, who yearns for an authoritarian catholic president for life, is teaching constitutional law at Harvard.
TheRickles
(2,053 posts)jorgevlorgan
(8,285 posts)Before the book made it big, this group literally called a certain group of women in it "handmaids," who were required to follow every demand that the group puts on them -all the way down to their sex lives.
SayItLoud
(1,702 posts)tRUMP needs the Latino, Hispanic and older Cubans in Florida. He will select Lagoa of Florida. He only cares about himself and winning Fl. is really REALLY important for him. With her on the SC he can contest the election as rigged in FLorida, he can add votes from those group mentioned above and if he's ever tried for anything he has her on the SC to give him "payback". So. Lagoa will be the nom.
Totally agree @ Lagoa, 1000%.
world wide wally
(21,739 posts)what will they turn their attention to?
TexasBushwhacker
(20,165 posts)and belong to such a group. Furthermore, if the group or her husband demanded that she go against the Constitution, what will she do?
forthemiddle
(1,379 posts)Did either her husband or her Church demand she go against the Constitution?
She has a record, go after her on that, not her religion, or marriage. That is a sure fire over!
SergeStorms
(19,192 posts)a cult, within a cult, within a cult, within a cult etc. Whatever happened to logic and critical thinking? Thanks to republicans, their evangelical overlords, corporate lobbyists and the NRA (yes, the NRA) we now have armed "christian" white separatists walking the streets, who are unencumbered by any law enforcement oversight. Now, one of this group of brainwashed miscreants is probably going to be elevated to the highest court in the land, to pass judgement on the majority of Americans who don't believe any of their gun driven, apocalyptic, angry daddy in the sky bullshit?
This country is rapidly swirling into a death spiral on it's way down the drain. What happened to this nation's great experiment of Democracy? Right-wing zealots who want singular thinking and complete control over what you think and do. That's what happened. That's what always happens eventually when these people are allowed to gain a foothold in decent society.
DeminPennswoods
(15,273 posts)repeated over and over until when most Americans hear her name, they think "cultist". There doesn't have to be any religion attached to that description at all,.
She can explain how it's not a cult and Senators can question her about it. Remember the adage, if you are explaining, you are losing.
DallasNE
(7,402 posts)Who on the court is not Catholic now that RBG has passed away?
The present day church seems to have a number of offshoots that are extreme, including current court members. Barr is a Catholic member of Mater Dei, another of extremist offshoots. And the Senate confirms them all.