NYT just took a *king BASEBALL BAT to Trump's kneecaps 48hrs before the debate!

[Maru Kitteh]

CNN also reporting he paid a suspicious 700K to Princess for "consulting." If the NYT goes after her harder, HE WILL LOSE HIS SHIT.


This is AWESOME.

[Blue Owl]

1. K&R

[dhill926]

2. perhaps those exercising real power behind the throne...

have decided enough is enough...

[demtenjeep]

3. 700 K to Princess????

someone or the cruise line?


more detail please

[jpak]

5. Ivanka. Trump gave her $700k in consulting fees

Disgusting

Yup

[MaryMagdaline]

6. Ivanka

She was paid 750k in “consulting fees” even though she was an officer.

[Maru Kitteh]

9. His daughter-wife. All I know so far is it was framed in the light of

Fred using illegal schemes to pass money to his children avoiding the gift tax - evidence that Donnie two scoops is doing the same.

[Claustrum]

4. He kinda lost his shit already

His answers to the NYT story is "it's fake" and "I will release my tax return and clear up everything as soon as his audit is done", though his audit has been 5 years plus and still going.......

He has no real answers to these news reports.

[The Wizard]

10. All presidents get audited

That never was the cause for all other presidents to conceal them. They all opened their books for scrutiny.

[Claustrum]

12. You are correct. The president's taxes get audited every year and get done

It doesn't magically last over 5 years as Trump tends to suggest.

So they could release older and audit completed taxes. But he just refuses to do so.

[Maru Kitteh]

16. exactly. he could make it all go away by "proving" them wrong

but of course, he won't, because they're right.

[Maru Kitteh]

11. Oh, this is nothing. I predict an EPIC self-immolation

in the days or weeks to come.

[NCjack]

8. News Flash -- Mr. Trump announces that the Tuesday night debate has been move to Moscow.

[In It to Win It]

13. NYT to everyone: Fuck your debate topics!

[gratuitous]

14. Certainly an improvement over 2004

In 2004, one of the most damaging stories that couldn't quite be confirmed against the Bush administration was that it was spying on citizens. Various reporters tried a lot of different approaches to prove that Bush was acting unconstitutionally in obtaining FISA court warrants to dig up dirt on U.S. citizens. It was something that a lot of people said would be a game changer and a dealbreaker for a second Bush term. Well, the New York Times had the story early in 2004, but sat on it until December when it didn't matter anymore. Bush won re-election and claimed a mandate for everything, even the secret illegal stuff. The Times lame excuse for withholding the story is that they didn't want to influence the election.

[dem4decades]

15. The Failed New York Times did what?