CO-SEN: In Shift, Gardner Now Says He Blocked Garland Because He 'Disagreed with the Selection'
Ever since refusing to meet with Judge Merrick Garland, whom President Obama nominated to replace Justice Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court, Sen. Cory Gardner (R-CO) has insisted his objection to Garland was about the process, not the person. In an interview last week, however, Gardner said his decision to block Garland was because he disagreed with the selection.
Watch Gardner here, speaking via video to the 20/20 Growth Cannabis Public Policy Conference III on Sept. 23:
nterviewer: In February of 2016, you said, The next election is too soon. We shouldnt appoint a new justice, need to let the American people decide this. I can read your exact quote, if you want. But now youre saying that, its September 2020, and its not too soon, youre interested in appointing new justice immediately versus qualified. So I guess my question is, why was February of 2020 of 2016 too close to an election but September of 2020 not?
Gardner: Yeah, I think its the same standard today that applied in 2016. The Senate majority exercising its advise and consent powers. In 2016, we did not move forward [garbled]. In 2020, I think its important we move forward to fill the judge. I disagreed with the selection in 2016. And Im looking forward to a justice that is qualified, that wont legislate from the bench, who will uphold the rule of law in the Constitution. So, that kind of a nominee put forward, my advice and consent will be to put that justice in place, just like it would have been in 2016, had that advice and consent been for a justice if admitted, that met and fit that criteria.
This is a dramatic shift from his previous public position, which he has repeated since first announcing it in a March 2016 press release immediately upon Garlands nomination.
https://www.coloradopols.com/diary/146960/in-shift-gardner-now-says-he-blocked-garland-because-he-disagreed-with-the-selection