Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(58,488 posts)
Wed Sep 30, 2020, 02:39 AM Sep 2020

Ohio appeals court rules state doesn't have to accept electronic absentee ballot requests, overturni

COLUMBUS, Ohio -- A Franklin County judge was wrong when he ordered Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose to accept electronic absentee ballot applications for the upcoming presidential election, a three-judge Ohio appellate court panel unanimously ruled Tuesday while overturning the previous decision.

owever, all three judges said LaRose, a Republican, under state law has the discretion to do so were he to so choose at some point in the future.

Three judges from the 10th District Court of Appeals said they agreed with arguments from the Ohio Democratic Party that the state law doesn’t prohibit elections officials from accepting applications for absentee ballots via email or fax. But two of the judges said the Ohio Democratic Party didn’t demonstrate a “right” under the law to “unlimited methods for delivery of their applications” or prove that LaRose had a legal duty to offer applications option beyond in-person or mail delivery of applications.




https://www.cleveland.com/open/2020/09/ohio-appeals-court-rules-ohio-doesnt-have-to-accept-electronic-absentee-ballot-requests-overturning-earlier-decision.html

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ohio appeals court rules ...