General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSome interesting observations from Republicans
Last edited Thu Oct 1, 2020, 12:28 AM - Edit history (1)
In today's NY Post, ultra-Conservative columnist Michael Goodwin wrote:
From the get-go, the president was determined to rattle Biden by being a persistent interrupter, rarely letting the former vice president finish two consecutive sentences. On occasion, his interjections were smart, but mostly, they made him look boorish.
Also in the Post, former editor John Podhoretz wrote:
It was painful and sordid and cringe-inducing, and that was almost entirely Trumps doing.
(snip)
And face it: If you didnt love Trump when the evening started and werent already a fan of his WWE approach to politics, there had to be at least one moment, maybe two, when you listened to the leader of the Free World and thought, What a jerk.
At The National Review, Kevin D.Williamson wrote:
Also from NR is Jim Geraghty's column:
In a year that has been a dumpster fire in so many ways, this debate fit in perfectly.
Here's the rest:
https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/the-debate-dumpster-fire/
An editorial in The Wall Street Journal:
A last one from Charles Hurt at The Washington Times:
(snip)
But instead of making his case strategically to the millions of people watching on television, Mr. Trump tried to win the room. The room was nearly empty. Half the crowd was stacked against him. And they were wearing masks. Oh, and ordered not to clap or boo.
Yet he flails away talking about Russia and Hunter Biden and rigged elections like hes whipping up a crowd at a monster rally with Air Force One behind him.
It's fascinating that there is so much criticism of Trump's performance last night coming from the Establishment Right Wing. One senses that Republicans can feel the end of the Trump Era rushing at them.
I take it as an harbinger of significant change.
Fla Dem
(23,650 posts)join this list of RW Trump criticizers, then Ill be doing backflips.
Thanks for taking the time to post all these excerpts. Very enlightening.
PJMcK
(22,031 posts)I try to read some of the mainstream right-leaning perspectives. It helps to know our opponents.
McConnell and Graham are too far down the rabbit hole. It would be blissful if one or both lost their seats in November.
MyOwnPeace
(16,925 posts)One can only hope that they are WAY down there cowering and shivering!
To paraphrase Twain: "I would never intentionally wish anything bad on them, but if something "bad" were to happen to them I would take some pleasure in reading of the details."
minidriver
(57 posts)SeattleVet
(5,477 posts)And I don't think that they can get their noses any further up there.
Thanks for starting my day with a chuckle!
ArizonaLib
(1,242 posts)Especially McConnell. He is a cockroach with black mold spores for a soul.
Ferrets are Cool
(21,106 posts)This, of course, is thanks to Cheney's wiretapping and illegal surveillance.
RussellCattle
(1,535 posts)...disappear again, please. Here's a happy thought. When Trump crashes and burns in November, a lot of idiot commentators on the right will hopefully have to shut up for at least a little while. But then, I'm an optimist. Hannity will no doubt be interviewing lame duck Donald until inauguration day and beyond.
PJMcK
(22,031 posts)Still, he's an excellent writer who can express his political views succinctly.
I try to read points of view that differ from my own. First, it keeps me from living in a bubble. Second, it helps me to clarify my own thoughts. Lastly, it's always good to know what our opposites are thinking.
RussellCattle
(1,535 posts)...better informed. Maybe the "Pod Man" makes me a little crazy because he does write well. Thanks for the reality check.
PJMcK
(22,031 posts)RussellCattle
(1,535 posts)erronis
(15,241 posts)SergeStorms
(19,193 posts)Like a shark's eyes. That guy is straight-up evil.
PJMcK
(22,031 posts)Still, he was an excellent writer even though I almost never agreed with him. After all, he was awarded a Pulitzer Prize.
At the end of his life, he was opposed to Trump so he gets a very small pass from me.
BComplex
(8,036 posts)KS Toronado
(17,199 posts)BComplex
(8,036 posts)I really hope this man goes to prison.
Generic Brad
(14,274 posts)OnDoutside
(19,953 posts)showed up on MJ today for the first time in a while.
RussBLib
(9,006 posts)shameless
shameless
shameless
shameless
shameless
shameless
shameless
shameless
PJMcK
(22,031 posts)RussBLib
(9,006 posts)We are exploring the dizzying depths of their depravity. Is there no blow too low?
I cannot imagine being that craven. Obviously would not have flourished in politics.
AZ8theist
(5,456 posts)They just blocked a resolution condemning white supremacy, so there's that...
Caliman73
(11,730 posts)They don't see it, they WANT it. Trump is bad for conservatism because he espouses what conservatives actually want but he is ugly and brutish and lays conservatism bare for all to see.
They want Reagan, who was the nice old grandpa who chuckled and told folksy stories while funding right wing death squads in El Salvador and Nicaragua. They want Gerald Ford who was doddering while, pardoning the treasonous Nixon. They want the nice face and the horrible policies. Trump is the horrible face with the horrible policies who will tell people that he just wants to take money from the people and use it because he deserves it, because he is better than everyone else and deserves to be on top.
I do not think that conservatives can change. They have a very fixed idea of what their ideal world is, and it entails rich White, Christian, men running the show, and everyone else serving that power structure.
You never see them admit that Conservatism as an ideology is wrong, but that people fail the ideology. That is what they are thinking here, but the reality is that Trump is the id, the raw, exposed avarice of Conservatism, exposed.
PJMcK
(22,031 posts)McConnell is probably done with Trump. He's gotten all the judges he could want and might even get another SCOTUS seat.
Graham is fighting for his political life. Trump is probably a net-negative for him between now and the election.
The faceless, wealthy white men in the shadows who actually run the show are probably tired of Trump's ineptitude and boorishness. He's not a good frontman for their efforts.
Those shadowy PTB will never admit that Conservatism and raw Capitalism are terrible ideas for a civilization because then they would lose their wealth and power and social standing. You're right that Trump exposes the id of the Right. His rise to power in the Republican Party was probably inevitable given their history and trajectory over the past 40 years.
TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)Smiling fascist
Caliman73
(11,730 posts)But there was the veneer of caring, of folksy wisdom. There is no doubt that Reagan was a horrible president for anyone but the wealthiest White people, but you could still front the facade.
With Trump, what you see is what you get. Trump is a complete liar, but there is a truth to him. His vulgarity, his open disdain for democratic process and traditions. His hatred of, but lust for women, his disgust for people of color and LGBT people. That is conservatism. They are as depraved as the monarchies and aristocracies that preceded them, but they have always tried to hide it away behind social propriety.
They don't like Trump because he is showing everyone what the ideology is really about.
TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)JI7
(89,247 posts)Caliman73
(11,730 posts)They represent far fewer people in terms of actual policy. They win because they have focused on the process of voting, not on the policies and government.
Republicans win because they have districted themselves into winning the majority of representation with fewer voters. White people still make up the majority of voters in the US, so it isn't about White people per se, but about the politicians choosing their voters rather than the voters choosing their representatives.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)The nonstop hateful, lying propaganda machine makes sure that people remain disinformed and whipped up with anger aimed at shadowy, scary Libs.
moonscape
(4,673 posts)votes for Biden? They want to retain the Senate, and their jobs, but am thinking even they might be relieved if this comes to an end.
GusBob
(7,286 posts)and something I had not considered nor heard before. He was working the room not the living rooms. Shifty shifty eyes
The irony is, Trump a TV president, was not playing for the camera, while Biden, when he could, looked into the camera, and spoke to the country
PJMcK
(22,031 posts)He looked us in the eye (so to speak) and spoke of us as one country. He spoke with hope and ideas. He spoke of our families and our needs. He spoke like an empathetic leader.
Those were VP Biden's strongest moments last night, in my opinion.
GopherGal
(2,008 posts)playing to his base, many of whom probably think he "won" the debate by being loudest and talking over Biden and Wallace.
Given the mismatch to the audience and the no booing or clapping rules, he couldn't get his narcissistic supply from slavering MAGAts. And his manner, precisely calibrated to elicit howls of approval from his base, is nearly as certain to put off independents and those mythical suburban women he thinks he has a chance of winning over.
ProudMNDemocrat
(16,783 posts)The Republicans going down with him.
D_Master81
(1,822 posts)I know a lot of republicans living in a deep red part of red Indiana. That said, while most will still vote for him, many are saying how embarrassing trump was. 1 even openly posted Ive tried to convince myself to vote for trump but I cant do it.
brooklynite
(94,502 posts)National Review is abbreviated as "NR"
PJMcK
(22,031 posts)I'll fix it right now.
Escurumbele
(3,386 posts)Which is more persuasive something like this . . .
Since 2005, national greenhouse gas emissions have fallen by 10 percent, and power sector emissions have fallen by 27 percent even as our economy grew by 25 percent . . . From 2005 to 2018, total U.S. energy-related CO2 emissions fell by 12 percent. In contrast, global energy-related emissions increased nearly 24% from 2005 to 2018 . . . U.S. greenhouse gas emissions fell about 2 percent in 2019 . . . The 2019 drop was driven by a nearly 10 percent fall in emissions from the power sector, the biggest decline in decades.
~~ VP Joe Biden (soon to be president)
Or what the president said last night: We have now the lowest carbon if you look at our numbers right now, we are doing phenomenally.
~~ donald the con trump
Aristus
(66,316 posts)They'll probably be relieved not to have to explain all the time what the guy who Tells It Like It Is actually meant.
MyOwnPeace
(16,925 posts)and from where I see it, SPOT ON!!!!!
yonder
(9,663 posts)"...the guy who Tells It Like It Is" always having to have someone explain what he really meant.
lindysalsagal
(20,670 posts)Glad the idiot gop pundits can at least admit this much. magat's a rabid racoon.
PJMcK
(22,031 posts)And you're right. Republicans are idiots.
Cosmocat
(14,563 posts)"This country was exposed in its fullest display a madman want to be dictator" is it nothing more than the right wing vapidly enabling the destruction of American democracy.
Poor Trumpy Bear can't get out of his own way ...
yonder
(9,663 posts)jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)"...but brought up Hunter Biden."
Pretty sure that wasn't a misstep that was by deflection by design...whenever they start talking about taxes or covid or military "losers"... you go immediately to Hunter Biden...
FakeNoose
(32,633 posts)I don't know how many, we'll see when the polls come out. He cannot possibly have gained any new uncommitted voters, and certainly turned at least some people off.
Biden can hold his head up, I think he acquitted himself well. He got a few zingers in when he got the chance. He kept his temper and his wits, and he made great spontaneous answers to Chump's insults.
This is definitely a win for Joe, but I don't ever want to see another "debate" like this again.
PJMcK
(22,031 posts)We've heard of people who voted for Trump in 2016 but won't vote for him in 2020.
Have you ever heard of anyone who voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016 but has decided to vote for Trump in 2020?
Trump doesn't understand a key element of electoral politics: It's about adding voters to your base. You can't win by erasing your numbers.
Trump is an idiot.
Cha
(297,154 posts)(snip)
But instead of making his case strategically to the millions of people watching on television, Mr. Trump tried to win the room. The room was nearly empty. Half the crowd was stacked against him. And they were wearing masks. Oh, and ordered not to clap or boo.
Yet he flails away talking about Russia and Hunter Biden and rigged elections like hes whipping up a crowd at a monster rally with Air Force One behind him.
I mentioned before the debate that he would treat it like he was at one of his hate-fest rallies.
Demovictory9
(32,449 posts)Brother Mythos
(1,442 posts)PJMcK
(22,031 posts)It's often instructive to read what our political opponents have to say. I was fairly surprised when I started to see how many GOP voices were offended by Trump's debate performance.
Enjoy your day!
William Seger
(10,778 posts)On occasion, Michael Goodwin sounds like an idiot.
PJMcK
(22,031 posts)His columns are uninformed, biased and usually stupid.
My reason for quoting him was simply because he was so critical of Trump. As were quite a few other Right leaning voices.
eppur_se_muova
(36,259 posts)Therein lies the difference between Ds and Rs.