Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 12:34 PM Jan 2012

Actress, 40, Makes a Federal Case of Her Age

Actress, 40, Makes a Federal Case of Her Age

(CN) - A formerly anonymous actress who sued Amazon.com and its Internet Movie Database last year for revealing her age has identified herself, and her age, in an amended federal complaint.

Huong Hoang, 40, of Texas, goes by the stage name of Junie Hoang. She has appeared in the films "I Didn't Know I Was Pregnant," "My Big Phat Hip Hop Family," "Gingerdead Man 3: Saturday Night Cleaver," and others.

She sued Amazon last year, seeking several millions of dollars in Seattle Federal Court, claiming the company used her personal and credit card information without her consent to cross-reference public records and other sources to learn her age and post it on her profile.

That caused her to lose work, she says in her amended complaint, "because lesser-known forty-year-old actresses are not in demand in the entertainment business." She adds that "because plaintiff looks so much younger than her actual age indicates, plaintiff has experienced rejection in the industry for each 'forty-year-old' role for which she has interviewed because she does not and cannot physically portray the role of a forty-year-old woman."

http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/01/09/42860.htm

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Actress, 40, Makes a Federal Case of Her Age (Original Post) The Straight Story Jan 2012 OP
she may have a case. barbtries Jan 2012 #1
Meryl Streep said that for months after she turned forty ehrnst Jan 2012 #7
But she IS 40... Ron Obvious Jan 2012 #2
Here is the PDF of the actual complaint, much more info: The Straight Story Jan 2012 #3
Depends upon how they got it. zipplewrath Jan 2012 #4
true, but even more than that -- actors don't have the same privacy rights the rest of us do unblock Jan 2012 #5
Reading the complaint, this case is based on 1) Breach of Contract; 2) Fraud; 3) Violation of Romulox Jan 2012 #6
i would think it goes to damages -- generally an actor can't claim damages from public information. unblock Jan 2012 #12
That will be the argument zipplewrath Jan 2012 #15
Even if she does not have much of a case in that situation The Straight Story Jan 2012 #23
If she is experiencing age discrimination from casting directors, then she should sue *them.* Lance_Boyle Jan 2012 #8
How is she "failed"? Do you know anything about the business? Darth_Kitten Jan 2012 #20
But aren't acting roles based on age? savalez Jan 2012 #22
I Didn't Know I Was Pregnant? My Big Phat Hip Hop Family? GingerDEAD Man? rocktivity Jan 2012 #9
She does look kind of young: The Straight Story Jan 2012 #10
How recent is that picture? N/T GreenStormCloud Jan 2012 #13
not sure, it was along with the story at this other link: The Straight Story Jan 2012 #26
Does she think Hollywood directors are stupid? GreenStormCloud Jan 2012 #27
Gosh I feel old now dsc Jan 2012 #24
she's trying to make an honest living BlancheSplanchnik Jan 2012 #11
WTF? blueamy66 Jan 2012 #17
When actors/actresses provide their acting history LiberalFighter Jan 2012 #14
Because producers are human, too and can make judgment calls. Darth_Kitten Jan 2012 #21
this is what used to be called a marybourg Jan 2012 #16
I think she has a case, or should have a case. In the entertainment world.... Honeycombe8 Jan 2012 #18
But isn't SHE discriminating against OTHER young and young-looking Asian actresses? rocktivity Jan 2012 #19
They used her supposedly private information to make money for themselves. So pay up, Amazon. freshwest Jan 2012 #25

barbtries

(28,787 posts)
1. she may have a case.
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 12:40 PM
Jan 2012

if she looks much younger but is losing jobs because now the casting people know how old she is and don't call, and then the casting people call her up for a 40 something gig and reject her because she looks too young.
my first thought was it's a vanity thing, but for this person it sounds as if it could legitimately be money in the bank.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
7. Meryl Streep said that for months after she turned forty
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 01:02 PM
Jan 2012

She got offers to play "witches."

It's even true about writers - there were some writers who worked on M.A.S.H. who wouldn't put that on their resume in the 90's and later because they were afraid that they would be considered too old to write for new movies and television series.

 

Ron Obvious

(6,261 posts)
2. But she IS 40...
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 12:43 PM
Jan 2012

How is the truth not an absolute defence here? She's got my sympathies and I'm sure she's losing work over this, but I'd still say this is a frivolous lawsuit

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
4. Depends upon how they got it.
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 12:49 PM
Jan 2012

It appears her case rests upon how they obtained the information. If they got it "illegally", then she has a case. However, to receive any compensation, she has to demonstrate "damage". So she would sue for the illegal act (the method by which the info was obtained) and then establish damage by the effect of releasing data they obtained illegally.

unblock

(52,183 posts)
5. true, but even more than that -- actors don't have the same privacy rights the rest of us do
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 12:59 PM
Jan 2012

actors (even lesser-known ones) voluntarily give up certain expectations of privacy as part of the profession, so the standards for privacy are higher. a court could easily find that any actor bent on keeping such information private should have known to avoid handing over information that could be used to cross-reference public information. in fact, a court could easily find that the fact that the information is public in the first place is enough to let the defendants off the hook, even if the identification of the relevant public information was made easier by the misuse of confidential data.

they didn't disclose anything that was actually confidential. the information they actually disclosed was a matter of public record.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
6. Reading the complaint, this case is based on 1) Breach of Contract; 2) Fraud; 3) Violation of
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 01:02 PM
Jan 2012

Statutory Consumer Protection style privacy rights; 4) Violation of a Consumer Protection statute.

So the issue of a celeb's relative right to privacy isn't one of the legal questions at play, imo.

unblock

(52,183 posts)
12. i would think it goes to damages -- generally an actor can't claim damages from public information.
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 01:44 PM
Jan 2012

i wonder also if the fact that the defendants actions (if not their methods) are not obviously wrong and damaging wouldn't enter into a decision.

revealing an actor's age is not the sort of thing you would ordinarily think of tortious (in the absence of some indication from the actor that hey, i'm trying to keep this a secret).



oddly enough, had they said the actor was 500 years old and pregnant with elvis presley's three-headed martian twins, that would have been clearly protected. but the correct age is a question....

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
15. That will be the argument
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 02:02 PM
Jan 2012

But as you'll note, the "truth" doesn't enter into the argument on either side. It settles upon whether the information was derived "legally". If it was, there is going to be very little case at all.

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
23. Even if she does not have much of a case in that situation
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 10:04 PM
Jan 2012

The negative press about imdb/etc may cause them to settle it so that it goes away.

 

Lance_Boyle

(5,559 posts)
8. If she is experiencing age discrimination from casting directors, then she should sue *them.*
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 01:04 PM
Jan 2012

This is a case of a pretty much failed actress going after deep pockets instead of those actually wronging her. Maybe she'll at least get enough publicity out of the suit (which she'll lose) to make it onto one of the "D-List" reality shows.

Darth_Kitten

(14,192 posts)
20. How is she "failed"? Do you know anything about the business?
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 08:29 PM
Jan 2012

There is a very real and stupid bias against actresses aged 35-50. It is indeed harder to find work. Every person should be judged for their talent not on some perception on what a person of a certain age has to look like.

I hope she kicks ass.


savalez

(3,517 posts)
22. But aren't acting roles based on age?
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 08:37 PM
Jan 2012

Are you saying that the role of a 45 year old lawyer, for example, is going to someone under 35?

rocktivity

(44,573 posts)
9. I Didn't Know I Was Pregnant? My Big Phat Hip Hop Family? GingerDEAD Man?
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 01:09 PM
Jan 2012

That's quite a "body" of work.

She's too young-looking to get older roles, but too old in fact to get younger roles? Does it REALLY matter that much when you're just an extra?


rocktivity

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
27. Does she think Hollywood directors are stupid?
Tue Jan 10, 2012, 01:50 AM
Jan 2012

When an actress's agent is applying for a part for her and her age is not revealed, they know that she is hiding her age, and they know the reason why she is hiding her age.

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
11. she's trying to make an honest living
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 01:30 PM
Jan 2012

sucks that she can't break into higher grade films, but that's where she's at......gotta earn your money somehow.

It IS true that actresses are in big trouble once they hit "matronly" age, whether they're big box office or D-movie. She's trying to preserve her earning power.

Can't blame her.

LiberalFighter

(50,856 posts)
14. When actors/actresses provide their acting history
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 01:59 PM
Jan 2012

wouldn't they be able to guess what their likely age would be? She's appeared in various productions since 1992. That is 19 years.

Why would producers go solely on the age of an actress for a part? Isn't it a matter of what they appear to be and whether they fit the part?

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
18. I think she has a case, or should have a case. In the entertainment world....
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 02:15 PM
Jan 2012

age and appearance are EVERYTHING for women. If Amazon didn't have permission to print personal information, or obtained it from a non-public source, they should pay for the damage done to her career.

OTOH, I don't know if I would sue if I were her. There's something to be said for accepting the reality of one's own age and dealing with it.

It's complicated.

rocktivity

(44,573 posts)
19. But isn't SHE discriminating against OTHER young and young-looking Asian actresses?
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 07:52 PM
Jan 2012

Last edited Wed Feb 15, 2012, 10:17 PM - Edit history (1)

They're taking work away from her, too, just by existing! Wouldn't her case have a lot more merit if she included them as co-defendants? Oh, and throw in the all those mean old casting directors, too. Cue the DU "Cry Me A River" String Quartet!


rocktivity
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Actress, 40, Makes a Fede...