Wed Oct 7, 2020, 12:51 PM
Ponietz (2,449 posts)
"RADICAL LEFT DEMOCRATS GOT COUGHT COLD"
Let’s ask, again: Did the degenerate 🤡 go to the debate knowing it had COVID-19?
Chris Wallace thinks he was positive: https://www.wfaa.com/article/news/health/coronavirus/fox-news-anchor-moderator-chris-wallace-believes-trump-infected-covid-19-debate/507-93f3230a-88cf-49f8-b802-c16e048854f1 On the evidence presented thus far, is there probable cause to conclude it was an attempt to get Joe sick?
|
11 replies, 1486 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Ponietz | Oct 2020 | OP |
Eliot Rosewater | Oct 2020 | #1 | |
Ponietz | Oct 2020 | #10 | |
SCantiGOP | Oct 2020 | #2 | |
JI7 | Oct 2020 | #3 | |
Ponietz | Oct 2020 | #5 | |
SCantiGOP | Oct 2020 | #7 | |
Ponietz | Oct 2020 | #9 | |
Ponietz | Oct 2020 | #4 | |
stopdiggin | Oct 2020 | #6 | |
Ponietz | Oct 2020 | #8 | |
stopdiggin | Oct 2020 | #11 |
Response to Ponietz (Original post)
Wed Oct 7, 2020, 12:56 PM
Eliot Rosewater (30,027 posts)
1. And his family and entourage all purposely took off their masks, infecting the Biden's
is one of the reasons they did this.
I cant believe I had to take so much SHIT about it before. |
Response to Eliot Rosewater (Reply #1)
Thu Oct 8, 2020, 07:17 AM
Ponietz (2,449 posts)
10. One of the reasons we're here--too many couldn't see the noses on their own faces
Response to Ponietz (Original post)
Wed Oct 7, 2020, 12:59 PM
SCantiGOP (13,052 posts)
2. Why post misleading comments
Nothing in the article says that trump knew he was positive and went in hoping to infect Biden.
The truth is on our side with trump, we don't need to resort to his tactics. |
Response to SCantiGOP (Reply #2)
Wed Oct 7, 2020, 01:03 PM
JI7 (87,624 posts)
3. This isn't resorting to his tactics. This is based on facts.
Response to JI7 (Reply #3)
Wed Oct 7, 2020, 01:18 PM
Ponietz (2,449 posts)
5. Thank you, I just realized the misattribution to Wallace and edited
Sorry, been sick over 10 days now and it got past me.
|
Response to Ponietz (Reply #5)
Wed Oct 7, 2020, 01:48 PM
SCantiGOP (13,052 posts)
7. No problem
Apologize for sounding harsh.
|
Response to SCantiGOP (Reply #7)
Thu Oct 8, 2020, 07:07 AM
Ponietz (2,449 posts)
9. Please see Comment #8
Last edited Thu Oct 8, 2020, 08:39 AM - Edit history (1) |
Response to SCantiGOP (Reply #2)
Wed Oct 7, 2020, 01:06 PM
Ponietz (2,449 posts)
4. Any jury is instructed to draw all fair inferences from the facts
Knowledge and intent, in many cases, are inferred. Why is this unfair?
|
Response to Ponietz (Original post)
Wed Oct 7, 2020, 01:34 PM
stopdiggin (7,997 posts)
6. Nothing in the article linked
suggests that Trump knew he was positive. If new evidence is brought forth that he did know -- then that's a different ballgame. But please present that evidence. Otherwise ... Just trading in scurrilous speculation and conspiracy bait.
|
Response to stopdiggin (Reply #6)
Thu Oct 8, 2020, 07:06 AM
Ponietz (2,449 posts)
8. Well, here it is 24 hours later and the Atlantic said it--this is not scurrilous speculation
“The president evaded a COVID-19 test before the September 29 debate in Cleveland—a date by which he very probably knew he was infected and infectious.“
And it stymies me to think that people STILL give the POS the benefit of the doubt. Are you glad you were being “fair” while you got ripped off, again? the words “very probably” are just a bridge too far for some people [link:https://upload.democraticunderground.com/100214245173| |
Response to Ponietz (Reply #8)
Thu Oct 8, 2020, 01:36 PM
stopdiggin (7,997 posts)
11. again. do you have any evidence
that Donald Trump knew he was positive at the time of the debate? You either do, or you don't. If you don't .... That's speculation.
As I said previously -- solid evidence or testimony would make this a new ballgame. But, I'm waiting for that. Sorry. |