Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNevada Republicans are sloppy.
Link to tweet
?s=20
Nate Silver
@NateSilver538
This is semi-interesting.
In Nevada, 1.4% of mail ballots so far required a signature cure, when the voter didn't sign the ballot or the sig didn't match the one on file.
Dems have cured 51% of their rejected ballots so far, vs. 35% for Republicans.
@NateSilver538
This is semi-interesting.
In Nevada, 1.4% of mail ballots so far required a signature cure, when the voter didn't sign the ballot or the sig didn't match the one on file.
Dems have cured 51% of their rejected ballots so far, vs. 35% for Republicans.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 2311 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (30)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nevada Republicans are sloppy. (Original Post)
RandySF
Nov 2020
OP
It's amazing, the level of detail about this process we have access to this election year.
Mike 03
Nov 2020
#2
Glad it's better or for us, but I don't like that they throw out ballots for this.
Renew Deal
Nov 2020
#5
safeinOhio
(32,673 posts)1. Be great if that flipped the vote.
It's always in the details.
Mike 03
(16,616 posts)2. It's amazing, the level of detail about this process we have access to this election year.
Cha
(297,154 posts)3. That real Sloppy and Interesting!
BSdetect
(8,998 posts)4. 51% of how many rejected Dem ballots? Why were they rejected at first?
I hope it was two or three.
Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)5. Glad it's better or for us, but I don't like that they throw out ballots for this.
Assuming our pool of ballots isnt larger.
jaxexpat
(6,818 posts)6. Doesn't sound right. After all, how many ways are there to make an "X"?
Even Republicans should be able to do that.
groundloop
(11,518 posts)7. I have to wonder about the qualifications of people looking at signatures
I really really doubt that many (or any) of them are trained in signature analysis, plus it's a known fact that people's signatures change over time (mine certainly has). Plus, I strongly suspect that in many places a "Letitia" gets closer scrutiny than a "Mary".