General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSupreme Court, with Justice Barrett, to hear major LGBT rights case day after election
The Supreme Court is set to hear a case concerning the rights of gay and lesbian Americans on Wednesday morning in a dispute that advocates are warning could pierce holes in the nation's anti-discrimination laws.
Arguments, which will take place just a day after the presidential election, will mark the first major fight to come before Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who was sworn in a week ago.
Religious rights activists are pushing for the court to use the case, Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, to overturn a 30-year-old precedent that has for decades mediated the balance between freedom of conscience and the rights of minority groups.
Doing so could effectively reverse the court's trend in recent years of advancing protections for LGBT people, civil rights advocates warn. The case could also weaken laws protecting other groups, including Jews, Muslims and Mormons.
The case concerns a Roman Catholic adoption agency in Philadelphia that claims that it can't match foster children with same-sex households without violating its religious beliefs.
After learning about the policy in 2018, Philadelphia refused to refer the group new foster children, citing a city law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. The city added language to its 2019 contracts specifically prohibiting such discrimination against potential foster parents.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-with-justice-barrett-to-hear-major-lgbt-rights-case-day-after-election/ar-BB1aCw4v?li=BBnb7Kz
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)A question regarding the city of Philadelphia being able to stop using the Catholic group to place foster children. It seems as if any group can't abide by Philadelphia's laws, they would not be permitted to place foster children.
What if Philadelphia thinks the Catholic group is not good at placing foster children?
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,396 posts)They are trying to get out of following anti-discrimination laws and asking SCOTUS to rule that the law is unconstitutional- or at the very least- trying to poke holes in them.
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)Blue Owl
(50,291 posts)n/t