Note on AZ: there's a reporting error so the NYT estimate of 98% counted is incorrect.

[TwilightZone]

If you point at AZ on their map, the following disclaimer pops up:

"Due to a error in a Edison Research data feed of results, the estimate of the counted vote in Arizona is too high. The actual estimate is that 86% of the vote has been counted."

That's likely why it hasn't been called.

[BusyBeingBest]

1. No relaxation until it's safely in the bag.

[Boogiemack]

2. Is that good or bad for us? What remains to be counted? nt

[TwilightZone]

3. If the 98% was correct, Biden would have won AZ already.

It appears that he'll still win it, but we'll have to wait for the lead to become insurmountable now before it's called (again, by Fox).

[TwilightZone]

4. The NYT site has been updated to reflect the error. It's back to 86% reported.

[Johnny2X2X]

5. Lead down to 3.5. This isn't over

Crap.

[TwilightZone]

6. The remaining votes would have to lean pretty heavily Trump for him to catch up.

If my math is right, there's roughly 400k estimated to be outstanding. He'd need about 250k of those to catch Biden.

[BusyBeingBest]

8. They have a Republican governor, secretary of state tho, right?

Uneasy about that. Let's go, PA!!

[BusyBeingBest]

7. Depends on where they're scaring up the rest of these votes.

Not sure from where they're still coming from.

[JonLP24]

9. AP & Fox News called it

The count wasn't at 98% when they called it either.

[BusyBeingBest]

10. Yeah, I'm trying to figure out if the false numbers are just affecting the NYT

results, or their results as well. (They called it in the low-mid 70's).