Dem party needs Claire McCaskill and others of her ilk, EDITED

[elleng]

Last edited Thu Nov 5, 2020, 01:29 PM - Edit history (1)

to regain positions with many former Dems who've been attracted to repugs/trump.


This means, SHE'S RATIONAL! (Yes, I'm shouting; need lunch.)

[3Hotdogs]

1. Can somebody explain what that sentence means?

[Hermit-The-Prog]

2. My interpretation: We need skilled, moderate to conservative Democrats ...

Sometimes the primary process gives us fiery candidates who appeal to Democrats but not to enough independents and those who are barely R. There are areas where the majority of voters are not left of center. The Overton window there needs to be shifted gradually.

I could be completely misinterpreting the OP.

[3Hotdogs]

3. Probably a good translation.

Thanx.

[theaocp]

4. No. Be a Democrat and keep spreading shit about Republicans.

The way I hear it, Republican candidates prefer puppy flesh. It's the tenderest. Fuck these scum.

[milestogo]

5. She lost her Senate seat.

No, we do not need more people like her.

[Gothmog]

6. I agree

We made some progress but need to make more

Link to tweet