Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stinky The Clown

(67,789 posts)
Thu Nov 5, 2020, 10:33 PM Nov 2020

The polls

The following is speculation based on logic and reason. No actual facts to back it up.

I think the polls were more accurate than it appears. The right wing in general, and the Trump gang in particular, are NOTORIOUS cheaters. We also know there was a LOT of voter suppression.

Just by way of example, consider the disenfranchised former felons in Florida. They didn't get to vote in the expected numbers because of the GOP Florida legislature's legal voter suppression.

Louis DeJoy did a masterful job of slowing the mails. We will probably never know how many mail in ballots never found their way to their destinations.

Every cycle voter rolls get purged. This year was no different.

Polling places were reduced in numbers in places where Democrats - particularly Democrats of color - would go to vote.

Texas reduced the number of drop boxes to such a level as to be absurd.

These are just a few examples. It defies logic that this didn't suppress the vote.

Were some of the polls overly optimistic? I really don't know

And that's the problem. We REALLY don't know. And we might never. How many of us in the last few weeks, whether seriously or not, were wondering aloud if the pollsters were accounting for cheating.

So yeah. I think the polls were better than they appear right now.

I'm not ready to stick pins in a Nate Silver or Charlie Cook effigy.

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The polls (Original Post) Stinky The Clown Nov 2020 OP
Polls were overly optimistic and inaccurate. Plus, the polls should have been presented as a rectal Hoyt Nov 2020 #1
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
1. Polls were overly optimistic and inaccurate. Plus, the polls should have been presented as a rectal
Thu Nov 5, 2020, 10:41 PM
Nov 2020

extraction, not science. Something needs to change.

Polls cost us 2016 by making it appear Clinton had it in the bag, although there were clearly other factors. While it's too early to state that for 2020 before detailed analysis, especially since there were so many votes cast, I can't help but feel some in-person voters might have turned over and gone back to sleep on Nov 3.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The polls