Is It POssible To Get A Straight Answer From Kornacki?

[Me.]

Never straight forward, goes off in the weeds and the question never gets answered, just as the one by Reid didn't and it was a very simple question. And Rachel is no better. Where's Nicole, she had to pull those two back from their acrobatics and set them straight twice last night.

Yes I know, lots of fans from both here but I have now stopped listening to them.

[mr_lebowski]

1. Cause people ask him shit that they should know he doesn't know the answer to ...

And it ain't his job to estimate ... when the people who call the race 'should do so'.

Kornacki is killin' it, as always.

I think they're all doing well frankly.

[cwydro]

10. Thank you.

These whinging Kornacki posts tonight are too funny.

[TwilightZone]

2. Then watch something else.

There are alternatives. I really don't understand why people continue to watch something that clearly annoys them.

[Hoyt]

3. Sorry, but he makes perfect sense to me. He's quite good.

Maddow got me through bush years, but her long connecting the dots stories nowadays make me check CNN.

[Green Line]

5. I agree

I like him

[left-of-center2012]

4. Better than John King

In my humble opinion

[Hoyt]

7. +1. King is OK, but puts me to sleep. He shows no emotion.

[WheelWalker]

6. Grading on the curve, Kornacki wins the kewpie.

Bob Woodward agrees wholeheartedly, giving glowing testimony and a physical salute last night to Kornacki's professionalism, analysis and delivery.

[Karma13612]

28. Absolutely!

I wasn’t aware of that but agree with Woodward.

[Alpeduez21]

8. Let's just take a look at that question

Five hours ago the answer, or answers, or lack of an answer would have generated a response with something akin to an answer. After much more time has passed and we are closer to a possibility of a definite response then maybe a straight answer is around the corner.The last time that question was asked the general consensus was yes but. Now the question is asked here and now I can state that more information might be forthcoming in an hour. But since you're sitting there waiting for a response I will say......hang on, I gotta change my pants.

[Thekaspervote]

9. This!!

[Me.]

14. Joy's Question Was

At what point with the numbers does trump stop being a viable candidate in Pa.

[Me.]

19. Perfect

but does he change the pants, have a closet full of them on hangers

[tinymontgomery]

11. I like him

I like him, he cracks me up as he tries to keep up
and bounces around and hits the wrong buttons. I find it
quite entertaining. The guy is giving it his best after 3 days,
I give him a break.

[Totally Tunsie]

12. I'm enjoying watching him beat the computer when doing

the mathematical calculations in his head.

This dude really loves numbers!

[Karma13612]

27. I wish they gave him

A better way to write on the screen. The lag is terrible and not sensitive enuf.

I feel bad for him in a way.

Spend the $$$ on a better interface MSNBC! Steve deserves it!!

[Whiskeytide]

13. He's pretty watchable this time. Of course, the ...

... narrative is better this time than 2016. And also better than 2018 (remember the ‘18 blue wave was looking like a dud election night). I think many Dems got a bad taste in their mouth about him because he wasn’t delivering good news. I never cared much for him either, but he’s doing a pretty good job this time.

He’s not really supposed to opine about what might happen next anyway. He’s a statistics guy.

[Captain Zero]

15. I've cut back msnbc due to Kornacki & McCaskill

They just irrtitate me at this time.

[Me.]

17. THat Makes JUst About 2 Of Us

[Buckeye_Democrat]

16. He's a bit scatterbrained.

I like his information and knowledge, but it's often not direct.

Went back to the calmer John King for now.

[Celerity]

18. he makes sense to me (not Me. lolol)

[SharonClark]

20. Have you ever thought that it's not Kornacki,

it’s you?

[Me.]

21. God Why Would I Think That?

[Eko]

22. I like him, he does his job well.

And his job is not to call the election. Dude has barely slept in days to help us understand what is happening, big props to him, Maddow and all of them.

[k8conant]

23. He said that he didn't know when they'd release the counts from the counties, BUT...

it certainly looked as if ALL the mail-in totals coming in favor Biden. What else was he supposed to say?


https://www.votespa.com/About-Elections/Pages/Counting-Dashboard.aspx

[Me.]

24. He Could Answer Straight Forward Questions THat Don't Require Prognostication

and quits with the what ifs

[Karma13612]

26. He is doing analysis

That’s what stat geeks do.

They don’t need him for simple reporting of totals. Websites can do that. He provides insight and walks us thru the reasons behind the numbers.

[Karma13612]

25. Kornacki is great.

He is a total math and stats geek and completely unpretentious. Some things he knows he can’t answer and he has to be careful how he structures his answers. He gets marching orders from NBC I’m sure.

You can tell he wants to call PA for Biden tonight.

John King irritates me with his nearly comatose style and ever notice he doesn’t actually pronounce some words completely? Drives me bat*t crazy. Add Rick Santorum to the mix and I’m ready to ruin my wide-screen TV with a champagne glass.

MSNBC all the way for me and hubby.

[Vivienne235729]

29. I don't see that at all. This is about probability and I think most people want black and

White answers that don't exist.

[brooklynite]

30. Please let us know what other shows you're not watching...

[Me.]

31. Oh Ouch!

[dewsgirl]

32. I'm not always crazy about him, except when it comes to election

time. His love and dedication for his job are breathtaking. He is whip smart and you can feel his enthusiasm jump right out at you.