Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

uncle ray

(3,156 posts)
1. along with nate silvers tweet, this in interesting and concerning.
Fri Nov 6, 2020, 01:17 AM
Nov 2020

we need to get control of social media's role in politics and elections.

Spazito

(50,269 posts)
2. Okay, could someone please explain to me why Twitter has any say...
Fri Nov 6, 2020, 01:19 AM
Nov 2020

in whether The Economist can "call" the electoral college result or not? Twitter won't even suspend the biggest liar and violence promoter that squats in the WH but they wield their authority here, geez.

Spazito

(50,269 posts)
6. I saw that, what boggles my mind is that Twitter is taking this stand...
Fri Nov 6, 2020, 01:25 AM
Nov 2020

with legitimate reporting but do the disgusting waffling when it comes to trump and his enablers who are the real danger.

unblock

(52,190 posts)
8. I'm not clear in that part
Fri Nov 6, 2020, 01:33 AM
Nov 2020

When he says "Twitter", does he mean the company or the chatter on that site?

If it's the company, then surely "not calling" the election only applies to what they post on Twitter; they would say the economist can't call the election on their own website.

Anyway I'm not sure why Twitter the company would be bothered by people calling the election, at least as long as it's clear the user was talking about their own analysis and not presenting it as a confirmed final fact yet.

That's why I suspect he just means the chatter on Twitter.

Spazito

(50,269 posts)
9. Ahhh, that would make more sense...
Fri Nov 6, 2020, 01:36 AM
Nov 2020

the way it is written it reads to me as the company Twitter as opposed to comments on Twitter but sometimes it seems to me clarity has become a victim of this platform, lol.

W_HAMILTON

(7,859 posts)
5. I'm guessing maybe they are """both sides'ing""" it.
Fri Nov 6, 2020, 01:22 AM
Nov 2020

They keep putting warnings and disclaimers on Trump's lies, therefore they would have to do the same if a legitimate organization made an official call for Biden. My guess that is their bullshit rationale.

Spazito

(50,269 posts)
7. If they are equating legitimate reporting as the same as the lies and promotion of...
Fri Nov 6, 2020, 01:27 AM
Nov 2020

violence by trump and his enablers then this is further proof twitter et al are in serious need of regulation, imo.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Interesting tweet from Th...