General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPA provisional ballots
HOLY CRAP!! There are 100,000 provisional ballots out there that may be mostly republican that I have never heard discussed before.
That has me worried.
SoFlaBro
(1,915 posts)Are you concern trolling?
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)There's 100,000 provisional ballots but there is zero evidence they're Trump leaning.
BusyBeingBest
(8,052 posts)and with the unusually high number of them, and whether or not some will be tossed out, they just don't know.
angrychair
(8,694 posts)said he thinks they might be more republican leaning but yes, that are not positive.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Stop spreading fearporn.
angrychair
(8,694 posts)that 100,000 is a huge issue that I've never heard discussed until just now. That's crap. I feel like that is something that should have been brought up before now.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)He did not say they may be mostly Republican. He said provisional ballots in REPUBLICAN COUNTIES tend to be more Republican than mail-in ballots have proven to be.
There's plenty of provisional ballots in the Philadelphia that will not be Republican.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)As until now, yours has been nothing but unsupported allegations spun as badly as can be spun.
I wouldn't call that Concern Trolling, though... despite it fitting rather accurately within the definition.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)SoFlaBro
(1,915 posts)....where the in person vote was challenged - a.k.a. "largely Democratic"
Cosmocat
(14,563 posts)nm
angrychair
(8,694 posts)on MSNBC. Kornacki and Chris Hayes just went through it.
demmiblue
(36,841 posts)USALiberal
(10,877 posts)SoFlaBro
(1,915 posts)n/t
PTWB
(4,131 posts)Or from spreading misinformation?
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Irony. Fe + y.
LizBeth
(9,952 posts)Mister Ed
(5,928 posts)BusyBeingBest
(8,052 posts)StarryNite
(9,442 posts)oldtime dfl_er
(6,931 posts)just a minute ago
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)oldtime dfl_er
(6,931 posts)just repeating a tweet I saw. I should be better than that.
samnsara
(17,616 posts)..that the ballots are from ppl who came in and voted after there was an absentee ballot sent to them. Could be trumpers just dont know yet. But its hardly a 'lie'....
LisaL
(44,973 posts)NT
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)And frankly irresponsible to post knowing people are on edge.
angrychair
(8,694 posts)to the exchange between Kornacki and Hayes and he clearly states their are more provisional ballots from republican areas than normal and also states that when provisional ballots have been counted in republican friendly places he says they are not favoring Biden.
That was their exchange and I find it insulting that you are calling me a liar and irresponsible when I only posted based on that exchange which I characterized accurately.
BusyBeingBest
(8,052 posts)the gist of their exchange was that it's possible there will be more Repub provisional ballots compared to the mail-in ballot ratio that clearly favors Biden.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)That is what you said. That is not what he said. He didn't even say they may be mostly Republican, just that provisional ballots could run more Republican than mail-in ballots in these counties have.
So, I don't take back what I say. In fact, you just reinforced it.
angrychair
(8,694 posts)Quoted my OP above bolding my key wording of "MAY BE mostly republican" which is a fair characterization of "more than normal"
Please keep this civil. You can not agree with me or Kornacki's characterization but there is no reason to disparage people's integrity. I clearly related the conversation fairly in my OP.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)writes3000
(4,734 posts)He will win.
samnsara
(17,616 posts)Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)mail in ballots that were cured.
OhZone
(3,212 posts)Cause voting machines were not used?
Weren't there a lot of Day of voting in Democratic areas too?
Ms. Toad
(34,060 posts)Absentee provisional ballots - people who requested an absentee ballot but who showed up at the polls to vote anyway. As long as they did not return the absentee ballot, that day-of ballot will count. People who showed up at the polls leaned Republican.
Traditional provisional ballots - People who moved and didn't change their voting address in time, people who don't have ID, voters who were putged from the polls but weren't aware of the purge, etc. These generally lean Democratic - and generally have pretty high rejection rate (20%)
That's different than Jersey.
I went to the primary in person, and they forced all in-person to use provisional, because our Gov wanted Everyone to vote by mail.
arlyellowdog
(866 posts)He said they will grow Bidens lead
LisaL
(44,973 posts)NT
Ms. Toad
(34,060 posts)Traditional provisional ballots do tend to favor Democrats.
This cycle there are the Absentee provisionals. These are people who requested an absentee ballot, then for whatever reason decided they would rather vote in person on election day. People who show up at the polls on **this** election day trend Republican - so the expectation is that this tendency is expected to apply to these absentee provisionals.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)NT
Ms. Toad
(34,060 posts)than unsolicited mailed ballots (vote-by-mail, in their lingo).
The SOS there suggested that the traditional expectations about absentee ballots do not necessarily apply to these because of the higher number of absentee provisionals.
SoFlaBro
(1,915 posts)n/t
kenziemom06
(92 posts)What was their reasoning that they may be mostly Republican? I work on my local Election Board here in PA and provisional ballots were mainly for folks who requested mail-in ballots and didn't receive them, with a small amount being folks who didn't appear on the local voting roll. No reason at all to think they'd be mostly Republican.
RAB910
(3,497 posts)Most of the provisional ballots in my district were people who requested ballots and didn't receive them, i.e. Democrats.
Also, in PA, Repiblicans who had mail-in ballots but wanted to vote in person could remit their mail-in ballot at the polls, sign an affidavit, and then vote in person. They did not vote with a provisional ballot.
NoMoreRepugs
(9,412 posts)samnsara
(17,616 posts)Thekaspervote
(32,754 posts)Happy Hoosier
(7,285 posts)You seem to be the KING of concern posting.
angrychair
(8,694 posts)of frustration that this hasn't been discussed before and that Kornacki insinuated that they could potentially be more republican leaning.
Seems a huge thing to not talk about until now.
Thekaspervote
(32,754 posts)Happy Hoosier
(7,285 posts)Why those votes are VERY likely to lean democratic.
angrychair
(8,694 posts)so it was a little shocking and Kornacki stated that there was more provisional ballots from republican areas than normal. Those were his words...I have no idea.
I feel concern is a reasonable and valid response and we should always be realistic about our situation.
Happy Hoosier
(7,285 posts)but you seem to hit the panic button frequently.
Maybe word your posts a little more... I dunno... calmly?
Simply put, the provisionals are MOSTLY associated with mail-ins that did not arrive and these requests very heavily Democratic. And they will be heaviest in the big cities... also quite democratic. I don't know what Kornacki said, but dude needs some sleep.
VMA131Marine
(4,138 posts)about 75,000.
The typical acceptance rate of provisional ballots (i.e. the ones ultimately counted) is about 76%. Lets call it 80%. So thats 80,000 valid votes from the 100,000 provisionals. If Trump gets 80% of the provisionals then he will net 48,000 votes.
But, Bidens lead is 75,000 so Trump would still be behind by ~27,000 votes. And thats a best case scenario for Trump.
angrychair
(8,694 posts)appreciated.
Thekaspervote
(32,754 posts)Which seems obvious..lets keep ppl on the edge..tune in tune in...NO..tune out when you do that kind of shit
arlyellowdog
(866 posts)LisaL
(44,973 posts)NT
ananda
(28,858 posts).. to throw out provisional ballots?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2020/11/03/republicans-sue-pennsylvania-to-throw-out-provisional-ballots/?sh=2c1f10c51873
Republican candidates in Pennsylvania sued Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar in the states appellate court Tuesday night, arguing that voters whose mail-in ballots were rejected should not be permitted to cast provisional ballots instead, and Pennsylvania should throw out any votes in the battleground state that were cast that way.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)NT
arlyellowdog
(866 posts)BusyBeingBest
(8,052 posts)just ones that were cast after the voters' mail-in ballots were already rejected. That's a specific category--Provisional ballots are a broader category than that.
brooklynite
(94,501 posts)THE SKY IS FALLING!!!
THE BUILDING IS ON FIRE!!!
WTF!!!
OMG!!!
AEIOU!!!
EIEIO!!!
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Or some band-new form of panic and rumor?
Old MacDonald, indeed.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)know. Kornacki's trying to come up with an excuse for why the PA race isn't being called. It's lame.
Cosmocat
(14,563 posts)We literally have never had to do a provisional ballot in the 10 plus years I have worked our poll, and:
1) They very well could not be cast, because most were due to confusion about mailed in ballots. IF the elector had their mail in ballot cast, the provisional would be invalidated.
2) There are other reasons they might be invalidated, like if they were not registered in the voting precinct at all.
3) I honestly can not say if they would "lean" R or D because it is so random, not something that voter ideology would play a role in, more life circumstances or being an inactive voter. Though, come to think of it, if most of them are due to some kind of mixup with mail in ballots, that would be Dish leaning.
BusyBeingBest
(8,052 posts)jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)I think he's done a great job throughout this process explaining where the votes are coming from and how they differ geographically chronologically and based on mail or in person voting. At this point I feel like he's trying to inflate the doubt a bit to justify the fact that they haven't called this thing even though he has no say in that decision.
LizBeth
(9,952 posts)VMA131Marine
(4,138 posts)Trump team has sued to invalidate any ballots that were received after Election Day, even if they were postmarked on or before. This is a continuation of the suit filed before the election.
It was the PA Supreme Court that said ballots postmarked on or before Election Day and received by today should be counted. Trump sued saying only the State Legislature can change the method of counting the ballots. SCOTUS refused to act on the case, but Thomas, Gorsuch, Alito, and Kavanaugh wrote a dissent indicating they would have heard the case. Team Trump is now hoping that Amy Coney Barrett will be the deciding vote to take the case and throw these votes out.
Even if this is successful, we appear to be talking about hundreds of ballots, not tens of thousands.
StarryNite
(9,442 posts)Then there are the provisional ballots, votes cast by people who couldnt initially be verified as eligible when they showed up to vote. We dont know how many exist in the state, but these ballots are usually disproportionately in Philadelphia and tend to pad the Democratic lead by tens of thousands of votes.
This year, two factors complicate an easy analysis of the provisional ballots. Mr. Trump might be helped because the Election Day vote was more Republican this year. On the other hand, the provisional ballot count includes a new group this year: people who received an absentee ballot in the mail but showed up to vote in person and did not surrender their absentee ballot at the polling place. These voters had to vote provisionally to ensure their votes werent counted twice.
It is hard to know how many votes fall into this category, but given the consternation about the reliability of mail voting on both sides it could be a lot. These ballots may not be as favorable for Democrats as the overall absentee ballot count, since Democrats had a higher mail ballot return rate than Republicans perhaps reflecting the presidents criticism of the method. But Democrats still outnumbered Republicans, 52 percent to 34 percent, among mail ballots that hadnt been returned heading into the election.
At this point, the only serious question is whether the networks will make a projection in Pennsylvania with Mr. Biden holding a nominal edge, or whether theyll wait for him to build a more significant lead. Sometimes, they wait for a candidate to build a lead outside of the range of a recount 0.5 of a point in Pennsylvania before making a projection. There was a similar situation in Michigan on Wednesday, as Mr. Biden took a lead that was sure to grow, but the networks didnt call the state until Mr. Biden led by a full point. He now leads there by around three points.
If all of the absentee votes are counted, Mr. Biden ought to lead by over a percentage point before provisional ballots report which ought to be enough for a call. Who knows when well get there.
[link:https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/06/upshot/election-update-biden-pennsylvania.html|