Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Binkie The Clown

(7,911 posts)
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 06:20 PM Nov 2020

People are saying about Q-anon that...

... it is an experiment being conducted by some sociologists to see how many ridiculous falsehoods they can get the American people to believe. It has succeeded beyond their wildest expectations, but now they realize it's necessary to reveal that it was all a hoax perpetrated on a gullible public.

I've heard this from several sources already, but I haven't yet seen any official announcement. I imagine it will be coming shortly.

In the meantime, spread the word: Q-Anon come clean!

47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
People are saying about Q-anon that... (Original Post) Binkie The Clown Nov 2020 OP
what people?? MizLibby Nov 2020 #1
Many people. All the best people. nt Binkie The Clown Nov 2020 #3
Many People Are Saying! ProfessorGAC Nov 2020 #6
The morons who swallowed all this would call them liars if they did "come clean"... First Speaker Nov 2020 #2
Same thought I had. Karma13612 Nov 2020 #10
Oh, fer chrissake. PoindexterOglethorpe Nov 2020 #4
Hey, even if it's not true, it's a way to fight fire with fire. So spread it around. nt Binkie The Clown Nov 2020 #12
Spreading it around only legitimizes it. PoindexterOglethorpe Nov 2020 #32
Which is thew whole point. nt Binkie The Clown Nov 2020 #33
Why the fuck would you want to legitimize bullshit like that? PoindexterOglethorpe Nov 2020 #37
Link source? OhNo-Really Nov 2020 #5
You need IRB approval to conduct an experiment on ONE person greenjar_01 Nov 2020 #7
nobody reputable would perform an experiment that could have real election consequences. uncle ray Nov 2020 #8
Which proves those who are conducting it are not reputable. That proves my point. Binkie The Clown Nov 2020 #14
It's been done before lapfog_1 Nov 2020 #9
This! central scrutinizer Nov 2020 #16
Slenderman was a similar hoax, and it led two young girls to try to murder their "friend." tblue37 Nov 2020 #39
pretending? lapfog_1 Nov 2020 #40
Thinking back to my old Sociology teacher, shout out to Mr. Locker, Lady Freedom Returns Nov 2020 #11
And the more often we repeat it, the truer it becomes. nt Binkie The Clown Nov 2020 #13
Well, there's no doubt that it's a hoax. intrepidity Nov 2020 #15
You could be right, but either way, when they come clean later this week or next... Binkie The Clown Nov 2020 #17
I heard something about Ron Watkins resigning intrepidity Nov 2020 #20
Q-level lapfog_1 Nov 2020 #41
'sociologists' who got their 'degrees' from a tin of beanz Celerity Nov 2020 #38
americans been believing outrageous shit long before q-anon KG Nov 2020 #18
Aubrey Huff already said he thinks QAnon JDC Nov 2020 #19
If it is such an experiment, the MAGAs will over perform. nt Boogiemack Nov 2020 #21
Or is it the rwnj's projecting their horrible behavior (once again) on the left, a la Goering? fierywoman Nov 2020 #22
I don't know for sure, but maybe it's Russian sociologists. That would explain a lot. nt Binkie The Clown Nov 2020 #23
I get it StClone Nov 2020 #29
Shades of "War of the Worlds." LaMouffette Nov 2020 #24
just google Mels Hole..started by some local DJS on a late night shift.. samnsara Nov 2020 #25
No way! You live on top of Mel's hole?!? intrepidity Nov 2020 #31
I'd Like To Have a Word With the IRB that Approved That! Skraxx Nov 2020 #26
Russian sociologists wouldn't bother with such a technicality. nt Binkie The Clown Nov 2020 #28
And they would be happy to throw the US into chaos TexasBushwhacker Nov 2020 #36
Indeed- I posted about his below Redleg Nov 2020 #43
LOL! Damn Undergrads! Skraxx Nov 2020 #47
I've heard said from some people. Many people. The best people even Roland99 Nov 2020 #27
I would not be surprised Catherine Vincent Nov 2020 #30
So many people are saying that! Codeine Nov 2020 #34
Does everyone remember the commericial with the ditzy young woman... WyattKansas Nov 2020 #35
Peer pressure and ridicule are tools with a long, successful history Binkie The Clown Nov 2020 #46
I think this would be a violation of the American Sociology Association's ethical research standards Redleg Nov 2020 #42
there's always been the theory that the more preposterous a notion mnmoderatedem Nov 2020 #44
I've heard that Q followers are pedophiles who drink human blood while in pizzerias. Earthshine2 Nov 2020 #45

First Speaker

(4,858 posts)
2. The morons who swallowed all this would call them liars if they did "come clean"...
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 06:21 PM
Nov 2020

...this sort of thing never dies...

Karma13612

(4,538 posts)
10. Same thought I had.
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 06:26 PM
Nov 2020

Somehow there needs to be a source of information that is believed by all people. Unfortunately since we are so divided, even around the world, there is no ONE entity that all humans will believe for factual information.

When people can’t agree on facts or trust ‘the experts’, what can you do?



lapfog_1

(29,189 posts)
9. It's been done before
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 06:25 PM
Nov 2020

that experiment was named "Scientology"

create a religion based on ridiculous notions... and see how many people buy in.

Or, going back further, while not an experiment but just a con run by a con man... Mormonism...

History is replete with other examples

tblue37

(65,215 posts)
39. Slenderman was a similar hoax, and it led two young girls to try to murder their "friend."
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 10:00 PM
Nov 2020

Though I realize you're pretending here, it has been done before.

intrepidity

(7,272 posts)
15. Well, there's no doubt that it's a hoax.
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 06:31 PM
Nov 2020

But whether perpetrated by sociologists... doubtful. Unless loosely defined as incel larpers.

Binkie The Clown

(7,911 posts)
17. You could be right, but either way, when they come clean later this week or next...
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 06:33 PM
Nov 2020

...it will be a real bombshell.

intrepidity

(7,272 posts)
20. I heard something about Ron Watkins resigning
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 06:37 PM
Nov 2020

from 8kun or something. That could have something to do with something.

Google Fredrick Brennan for background.

ETA: changed header to Ron (son) from Jim (dad)

ETA2: Now I'm unsure about which one i heard this about...

ETA3(!): it was Ron. Per Slate:

On 8kun, the seedy imageboard where the movement’s anonymous leader Q posts messages to his followers, QAnon followers can’t quite agree on how to process Trump’s likely defeat. As NBC’s Ben Collins reported, Q has not posted anything since Election Day, and his followers are becoming more and more agitated at the silence. Ron Watkins, son of 8kun’s owner Jim Watkins and the administrator of the site, also resigned from his role on Election Day. With his site privileges, Ron was able to control the Q account whenever he wanted and very likely has some sort of working relationship with whoever is posting as Q, who claims to be a government official with “Q-level clearance.”

https://slate.com/technology/2020/11/qanon-election-trump-8kun.amp?

lapfog_1

(29,189 posts)
41. Q-level
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 10:55 PM
Nov 2020
https://www.usgs.gov/about/organization/science-support/human-capital/national-security-code-designations-security

If the National Security Clearance Level is a Department of Energy "Q" Clearance (DOE Q), the position is designated as Critical Sensitive, FPPS Code 3. The position is subject to Drug Testing, FPPS Code H.

Not a very high level of clearance.

JDC

(10,114 posts)
19. Aubrey Huff already said he thinks QAnon
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 06:37 PM
Nov 2020

Is a liberal ploy to distract and confuse MAGA.

And F Aubrey Huff.

LaMouffette

(2,017 posts)
24. Shades of "War of the Worlds."
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 07:01 PM
Nov 2020

You would think people would have become less gullible since the 1930s, but QAnon proves otherwise.

In the first year of Traitor Trump's "presidency," I grasped onto the slim and highly unrealistic hope that it, too, was an experiment (a hoax, if you will) and that Hillary Clinton had been president all along. The purpose of the experiment? To show Americans what could happen if a ruthless, amoral, totalitarian, narcissistic, sociopathic dictator became president and set about destroying all of the United States' norms and institutions, flouting every law, lying at every opportunity, colluding with foreign adversaries, calling into question the integrity of the press, enriching himself, his family, and his friends, and inciting violence and divisiveness among American citizens.

Then, on January 1, 2017, I hoped—in this fantasyland of mine—that Traitor Trump would reveal the truth: He was not the president, Hillary was! Whew! And his one-year mock presidency was just an experiment, a teachable moment, meant only to wake up America to the dangerous loopholes in our system that could be exploited, should a madman really be elected. Trump would chide us for being so foolish as to fall for his hoax.

Turns out it really was an experiment, but a "natural" one that arose unintentionally (like the one Rachel Maddow reported on that happened in Kansas this year when the majority of Kansas counties went maskless and a few others followed a public mask policy: Guess which counties had surges in Covid?). And alas, Hillary had not actually been president all along.

I just hope we learned something from this "unnatural" experiment. Some of us did. The others . . . not so much, I'm sure.

samnsara

(17,604 posts)
25. just google Mels Hole..started by some local DJS on a late night shift..
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 07:10 PM
Nov 2020

..they called into Art Bell with a wild story that grew legs very fast..esp since MY HOUSE is supposed to be where it is and I had paranormal groups knock at my door.

intrepidity

(7,272 posts)
31. No way! You live on top of Mel's hole?!?
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 07:47 PM
Nov 2020


Hey, but I bet it's nice to have a place to dump that old couch...

TexasBushwhacker

(20,131 posts)
36. And they would be happy to throw the US into chaos
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 08:10 PM
Nov 2020

I mean, the whole Q thing didn't come out of thin air. Someone started it and it did have some "stories" that were just as ridiculous as pizzagate. John Kennedy Jr is 1) alive 2) going to present himself and endorse Donald Trump and 3) is THIS guy (on the right)?



People really believe this. It's like "Can You Top This" for RWNJs.

Redleg

(5,779 posts)
43. Indeed- I posted about his below
Mon Nov 9, 2020, 02:54 AM
Nov 2020

Hell, at my institution, IRB doesn't even allow us to administer electric shocks to our subjects any more because too many undergrads complained. Just kidding!

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
34. So many people are saying that!
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 07:59 PM
Nov 2020

I mean, I don’t know if it’s true or not, but I sure keep hearing it.

WyattKansas

(1,648 posts)
35. Does everyone remember the commericial with the ditzy young woman...
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 08:04 PM
Nov 2020

Who believed that nobody was allowed to put anything on the internet, unless it was true?

Everyone in the country KNEW that she was stupid and naive to believe anything on the internet was fact.

The Q-Anon believers need to be laughed at, made fun of, mocked, shunned, and ridiculed by all for being so incredibly stupid for believing what someone put on the internet knowing for a fact that nobody cannot take anything they seen on Q-Anon into a Court of Law in the U.S. without fearing being labeled as insane.

Redleg

(5,779 posts)
42. I think this would be a violation of the American Sociology Association's ethical research standards
Mon Nov 9, 2020, 02:52 AM
Nov 2020

I don't know that for certain since I am more familiar with the American Psychological Association standards regarding research.

I also don't see how this is an "experiment," at least not in the sense of research design. What is being manipulated and what is being controlled? What is the sample and what information do the researchers know about the sample population and about the individuals within the sample? I don't see how this can be useful research, much less ethical.

Anyone doing this as research seems to be clueless about the profound negative effects this might have on some people in our population. It seems quite irresponsible to me. If it was created to see how it might influence political thought and choice, it was probably done so by non-professionals (e.g., not trained as social or behavioral scientists).

Just my 2-cents, a behavioral scientist struggling to stay focused on teaching my online courses and shitting out some research this year.

mnmoderatedem

(3,721 posts)
44. there's always been the theory that the more preposterous a notion
Mon Nov 9, 2020, 05:34 AM
Nov 2020

the more likely a person is to believe it.

Case in point. Qanon posted as fact that the bin Laden attack failed, and Biden had the Seal Team 6 killed to cover it up.

Trump re-tweeted that.

Let me repeat. Trump re-tweeted that.

Lends credence to the theory.

Earthshine2

(3,938 posts)
45. I've heard that Q followers are pedophiles who drink human blood while in pizzerias.
Mon Nov 9, 2020, 06:07 AM
Nov 2020

Also, happens to be one of my least favorite Star Trek characters.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»People are saying about Q...