Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why herd immunity must not be considered as policy: horrifying statistic (Original Post) tblue37 Nov 2020 OP
If anyone knows, Laurie Garrett does CountAllVotes Nov 2020 #1
Too late. SamKnause Nov 2020 #2
"Herd immunity" was just a paper excuse belatedly taped over the reality Hortensis Nov 2020 #5
Not to worry. We elected a Democratic president, and Hortensis Nov 2020 #3
Herd immunity doesn't come about by some percentage of people getting a disease. PoindexterOglethorpe Nov 2020 #4
herd immunity is not a rational short term goal stopdiggin Nov 2020 #6
Not to mention that people can get infected AGAIN. Buckeye_Democrat Nov 2020 #7
The death total is only part of the story central scrutinizer Nov 2020 #8

SamKnause

(13,091 posts)
2. Too late.
Mon Nov 9, 2020, 03:35 PM
Nov 2020

Not only has it been considered, it is the current policy in this country.

Trump should face hard time for his non action fighting Covid.

He should have a mask permanently attached to his face.

All the EVIL mother fucker had to do was tell his cult to wear masks.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
5. "Herd immunity" was just a paper excuse belatedly taped over the reality
Mon Nov 9, 2020, 03:45 PM
Nov 2020

that Trump had obviously failed to try to halt what became a pandemic. As the election approached. We'd of course be at least years and a couple million deaths from achieving it -- if it was achievable at all, highly questionable.

ALSO, it's a distraction from the reality that the Republicans in both the WH and congress literally refused to use a giant machine waiting to activate to contain and smother this virus before it became pandemic. As we'd always done before. Maddow and others briefly mentioned the need for investigations, later, with all attention first on stopping the deaths.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
3. Not to worry. We elected a Democratic president, and
Mon Nov 9, 2020, 03:36 PM
Nov 2020

DEMOCRATS DON'T DO HOLOCAUSTS. Depraved indifference to life in the WH and national policies promoting genocidal "cleansing" of society end at noon on January 20, 2021.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,839 posts)
4. Herd immunity doesn't come about by some percentage of people getting a disease.
Mon Nov 9, 2020, 03:44 PM
Nov 2020

It comes about from vaccinating.

If herd immunity were that easy to achieve, then things like, measles, mumps, chicken pox, even smallpox would not have been constantly infecting large numbers of people.

Perhaps, if literally every single person on the planet were to get this and either die or recover, then it would have no where to go and disappear. But that's not going to happen.

stopdiggin

(11,292 posts)
6. herd immunity is not a rational short term goal
Mon Nov 9, 2020, 03:46 PM
Nov 2020

and, with respect --
The graphic presented is really underwhelming as an argument. Essentially saying, "old and sick people suffer worse outcomes." Yeah. We knew that.

We need to selling negative health outcomes (immediate and chronic) from infections on the the country as a whole. Young, old, healthy, compromised, schools, day-care, health-care, military, sports .... It's a negative health outcome for the COUNTRY.

central scrutinizer

(11,646 posts)
8. The death total is only part of the story
Mon Nov 9, 2020, 04:01 PM
Nov 2020

How many “survivors” are facing years of serious complications, severe limitations, shortened life spans?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why herd immunity must no...