Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan I just say that the new OPs trending in lack of context or supporting info
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
50 replies, 3954 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (48)
ReplyReply to this post
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can I just say that the new OPs trending in lack of context or supporting info (Original Post)
Arthur_Frain
Nov 2020
OP
This annoys me as well. Lots of posters are context-challenged on this site.
Kingfisher86
Nov 2020
#6
Before Twitter we didn't used to be. I hate Twitter. It is the laziest form of communication...
Hekate
Nov 2020
#31
There are two types of people: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data and
theaocp
Nov 2020
#16
NCDem47
(2,248 posts)1. HA! Good one.
hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)2. might you finish your sentence?
malaise
(268,930 posts)20. Indeed n/t
AleksS
(1,665 posts)3. I can't believe I'm saying this, but:
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)4. I CAN'T BELIEVE IT!!! nt
intrepidity
(7,294 posts)5. ...or even a complete thought...
Kingfisher86
(46 posts)6. This annoys me as well. Lots of posters are context-challenged on this site.
Hekate
(90,645 posts)31. Before Twitter we didn't used to be. I hate Twitter. It is the laziest form of communication...
...ever devised.
sagesnow
(2,824 posts)7. I've just had it....
OhNo-Really
(3,985 posts)8. Faux Tweets &
johnp3907
(3,730 posts)9. Can't believe they didn't!
Or did!
🐏
🦧
🦣
Spazito
(50,290 posts)10. That tweet was outrageous, wasn't it!
Don't retweet it.
brush
(53,764 posts)11. No one likes a wise...
Stand and Fight
(7,480 posts)12. It's all about perception, but can you believe this????!!!!111
lame54
(35,284 posts)13. Go on
BusyBeingBest
(8,052 posts)14. I feel this
Atticus
(15,124 posts)15. Oh, sure! But, you are ignoring
theaocp
(4,236 posts)16. There are two types of people: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data and
Blecht
(3,803 posts)17. Bullshit! The real issue is
UpInArms
(51,280 posts)18. Posted without
OneBro
(1,159 posts)19. Me thinks them too lazy to write good titles.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)21. "New?" This has been going on for a
yonder
(9,663 posts)22. Worry-free and wisely, it was bound to
MizLibby
(289 posts)23. How do U put a emotie in the subj line????????????? I see peple doing it but i cant figure out how t
R B Garr
(16,950 posts)25. 💋💋💋💋👀👀👀
If you have a
MizLibby
(289 posts)26. LIPS EYES TY
R B Garr
(16,950 posts)29. 🚡🚄⚓️✈️🚀🚗🚝
lol, heres some planes, trains and automobiles!
Actually, I can do it when phone typing is all I was going to say. The iPhone emoticons post there okay.
MizLibby
(289 posts)43. Thanks RB, I was being silly. (kinda)
and I appreciate the the iphone info.
Roland99
(53,342 posts)24. Bravo!
AmericanCanuck
(1,102 posts)27. All I can say is this...
Iggo
(47,549 posts)28. Yes you can. Also...
malaise
(268,930 posts)30. It is what it is
but what is the end of this sentence?
KS Toronado
(17,199 posts)33. Appears to be a ? mark
Augiedog
(2,545 posts)32. OMG...or not
sarge43
(28,941 posts)34. On the other hand
In that case you should
If only he could
Foolacious
(497 posts)35. Is it just me, or am I the only one?
LiberalArkie
(15,713 posts)36. But?
Ferrets are Cool
(21,106 posts)37. Top post of the day. Bravo!!
ancianita
(36,023 posts)38. This thread, I gotta say
ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)39. I know right? Because
Old Crow
(2,212 posts)40. Agree 100%. This is one of my pet peeves around here.
Please, people: Before posting, read your text objectively from the perspective of someone who has no idea what you've just seen, heard, or thought.
NRaleighLiberal
(60,014 posts)41. Agreed...esp if there is an assumption we are watching something on TV
But, from someone here since 2004, it is as it was and will likely be
yardwork
(61,588 posts)42. I am owed beer and travel money for reading these OPs
MizLibby
(289 posts)44. Did you just see that??? on the TV????
OMG!
Old Crow
(2,212 posts)46. LOL! Exactly. 😆 (N/T)
NBachers
(17,103 posts)45. BLOCKBUSTER!!1!
AwakeAtLast
(14,124 posts)47. CALL CONGRESS RIGHT FUCKING NOW!!
Somebody had to post this, LOL!
Totally Tunsie
(10,885 posts)48. Another waste of time.
Why?
Blue Owl
(50,349 posts)49. Oh you...
dweller
(23,628 posts)50. Post removed
Post returns !
✌🏻