Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,881 posts)
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 10:42 PM Nov 2020

Screening travelers for symptoms of Covid-19 was ineffective, CDC study says

Temperature and symptom-based screening programs don't help catch coronavirus cases, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said in a new report that took a closer look at the programs used at US airports until mid-September.

In January, the CDC started an enhanced screening program for air passengers arriving from certain countries with widespread transmission of the novel coronavirus.

The goal was to find travelers who were sick and separate them from other passengers, to share information with travelers about self-monitoring and to get their contact information that could be shared with the passenger's local public health department.

The CDC said this was a resource-intensive program that had a low case detection rate. Between January 17 and September 13, the CDC screened more than 766,000 travelers. Nearly 300 met the criteria for public health assessment, 35 were tested for the coronavirus, and nine tested positive. That means the program identified about one case per 85,000 travelers screened, the CDC reported Thursday in the agency's weekly report.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/news/screening-travelers-for-symptoms-of-covid-19-was-ineffective-cdc-study-says/ar-BB1aXsUO?li=BBnb7Kz

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Screening travelers for symptoms of Covid-19 was ineffective, CDC study says (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2020 OP
That was obvious, as is testing visitors to public buildings, events, senior living communities, etc Doodley Nov 2020 #1
Not terrlibly effective - but particularly when you are dealing with Ms. Toad Nov 2020 #4
Very true Ms. Toad. Doodley Nov 2020 #5
Well when many are asymptomatic, bamagal62 Nov 2020 #2
IMHO the "temperature check" thing is a big joke BumRushDaShow Nov 2020 #3
Maybe they should have used dogs trained to detect covid-19. tikka Nov 2020 #6

Ms. Toad

(34,059 posts)
4. Not terrlibly effective - but particularly when you are dealing with
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 11:01 PM
Nov 2020

low-income workers who work with a very vulnerable populatio and whocannot take days off without risking losing their jobs it is essential.

Especially as to nursing homes, no one with symptoms should be working - and self-monioring doesn't work for that population of workers. It's not good enough - but it is better than nothing.

bamagal62

(3,246 posts)
2. Well when many are asymptomatic,
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 10:58 PM
Nov 2020

Then what do they expect? Even people with covid symptoms, don’t present with fever. When I was ill in March, they would not test me because I never went over 100. You can’t screen travelers with this virus. It doesn’t work. Plus, people can take ibuprofen and lie.

BumRushDaShow

(128,767 posts)
3. IMHO the "temperature check" thing is a big joke
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 11:01 PM
Nov 2020

They were apparently going by the success of using that as an indicator for SARS but that doesn't really work with this COVID-19 except to maybe catch those who really are symptomatic.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Screening travelers for s...