General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSincere question: Can Trump really pardon himself ?
I mean, I thought a pardon had to be extended to another person. Not to oneself.
I can easily see Trump resigning at the last minute, and Pence pardoning him.
What do we know about this ? Thanks in advance.
sboatcar
(412 posts)It would probably be a wise move on the part of Trump, but it doesn't protect him from any state charges or lawsuits.
JenniferJuniper
(4,507 posts)He either resigns before 1/20 as a part of a deal with Pence, or he trieds to pardon himself, which has never been done before.
sboatcar
(412 posts)But I would think that the courts would probably decide that that would mean that the president is above the law, and they probably wouldn't allow it.
By incoming president, I meant Pence, who'd take over til Inauguration day.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)But there's a lot of trust involved in both directions in a deal like that.
Plus, Trump would have a narcissistic hard time with resigning.
Hard to see it working out.
sboatcar
(412 posts)a circle jerk.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)You are correct!
Jersey Devil
(9,873 posts)Trump pardons himself. It goes to the Supreme Court to determine if he can do that under the Constitution where 6 friendly justices await him. What do you think would happen?
steve2470
(37,457 posts)From what I know, Gorsuch and Kavanagh have not toed the line 100%. No clue on what Barrett will do.
To your point, yes, if all 6 voted to approve of a self-pardon, it would not shock me.
Jersey Devil
(9,873 posts)I agree that maybe the Court would rule against a self pardon, but my point was that Trump would probably conclude it was worth the effort since, according to his thinking, 3 of the judges "owe" him in his transactional world. So I think he definitely will try it
Harker
(13,957 posts)SayItLoud
(1,701 posts)Turkey
Scotland
Panama
Cyprus
Canada
Pickem....
Harker
(13,957 posts)to take down the "polyester cockwomble."
highplainsdem
(48,895 posts)Trump's been talking about the possibility of pardoning himself since 2017.
Note the scenario, too, where Trump pretends to be so ill Pence becomes president temporarily (NOT at the very end of Trump's term, following his resignation), and pardons Trump during that time before he "recovers."
This would spare Trump having to worry if Pence might NOT pardon him if he resigned. I don't think he'd trust Pence that much.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)MineralMan
(146,250 posts)Personally, i don't believe he can do it and have it stand. The principle that one cannot judge him or her self is a staple of the concept of justice. So, a person should not be able to pardon him or her self.
A self-pardon by a President would be a very risky move, actually. It would be far safer for Trump to resign and be pardoned by Pence. That could not be questioned, while a self-pardon would be sure to be questioned and probably found to be illegal.
So, I expect a resignation from Trump, after he has pardoned his family member and others in his administration. Trump will be pardoned by Mike Pence, because that will have been arranged in advance, with the actual pardon reviewed in advance as well.
If Trump tries to pardon himself, he has a fool as an attorney.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)MineralMan
(146,250 posts)in a wide range of illegal actions and shenanigans of one type or another. I'm hopeful that investigations will take place and what is discovered will be made public. We need to know the truth, whether we can prosecute the perpetrators or not.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Investigate every last crime. Prosecute those we can. Persecute the rest. Let their crimes follow them everywhere.
In any event, he would still be liable to State charges, and both the Manhattan DA and the NY AG are waiting for him.
Cuthbert Allgood
(4,905 posts)There is nothing in the Constitution nor in existing case law that prevents it. So if he does, it would have to be litigated to make it invalid.
rso
(2,267 posts)Which is why by far the safest bet for Donnie would be for Pence to pardon him, as this would preclude any litigation. Of course, he would still be totally liable to State charges.
liberalmuse
(18,671 posts)I think the concept is ridiculous and authoritarian and has no place in a Democratic Republic. We need to have another Constitutional Congress with historians, experts in Constitutional law and philosophers to redefine the boundaries Trump has destroyed or else we are going to face a much worse crisis in the near future.
davsand
(13,421 posts)At least that's what my take away of high school and college level history/civics has always been. HOWEVER, a pardon accepted is admitting guilt for the pardoned crimes. Other then the terrible PR of a self pardon, I honestly don't know that Pendejo45 is willing to admit to himself that he did anything wrong--let alone to the entire world.
As an added twist to the whole pardon thing, he can't pardon state level crimes. His biggest potential danger, at this point, seems to be a state level rather than at a federal one.
I'm interested to see what the opinion is here from other more educated folks!
Laura
bluestarone
(16,852 posts)THIS probably should be decided one way or another! BUT i'm thinking RUMP would get away with it with THIS SC. If they decide for RUMP then, then i would think that, in itself should answer the question NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW? In my mind self pardon WOULD put this ASSHOLE above the law!!
SomedayKindaLove
(528 posts)By himself and then by Pence when he steps down. Fool proof!
highplainsdem
(48,895 posts)and pardon Trump then, followed by Trump's quick recovery.
That spares the very paranoid Trump from having to trust Pence to pardon him if Trump resigns.
Trump may still pardon himself, as well as pardoning everyone around him. But I really don't think he'd trust Pence enough that he'd resign if he thought a fake illness would work instead.
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(15,545 posts)A self-pardon would be a conflict with that.
Cuthbert Allgood
(4,905 posts)pwb
(11,245 posts).
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)I think it would be difficult to prosecute a president for anything he/she did while in office.
The question is what would a self pardon look like for crimes committed prior to being president? The constitution indicates that the president has the full discretion to pardon. No one else does. So because of that, the president must be able to self pardon if he/she has the discretion to pardon. I know that argument is kind of circular but I don't see how any other argument could be made.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,545 posts)ooky
(8,905 posts)can pardon him. That will be after he has pardoned his own family and cronies.
Thekaspervote
(32,691 posts)Bettie
(16,060 posts)No one has stopped him from doing anything else, so maybe?
IsItJustMe
(7,012 posts)I can understand, while whole heartedly disagreeing with it, why the Republicans would put up with his illegalities. But to some extent, in my mind, so have the Dems and the MSM. I think this was done mostly out of fear.
The example that sticks out in my mind was when, during the impeachment, the House allowed him to keep any of his people from testifying. That should have went to court, win or loose. Now we have the dangerous precedence that the Executive Branch can refuse to testify in front of the House.
I have been dumb founded at the lack of criticism toward him, from all corners.
Happy Hoosier
(7,212 posts)The Constitution does not place limits on the power. But it would seem to fly in the face of the principal that no one is above the law. If Trump can pardon himself, he is literally above Federal law.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)himself and will definitely extend pardons to his family circle for sure.
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)Self-pardons
During the Watergate scandal, President Nixon's lawyer suggested that a self-pardon would be legal, while the Department of Justice issued a memorandum opinion on August 5, 1974, stating that a president cannot pardon himself.
Jirel
(2,013 posts)Not tested in court. Extraordinarily unlikely to work, but not totally out of the realm of possibility with a whacked-out court of sycophants.
Jirel
(2,013 posts)Hed have to issue himself some form of blanket pardon in advance, since hell be out of office before charges are filed. So no - there is no pardon when a person has not been charged, and theres no telling what the charges may be at some unknown date and by some unknown federal prosecutor in the future. He can try, but it is 99.9% unlikely to succeed. The only possibility of success is that this approach hasnt been tried before, so there is no legal precedent. This would be the test case. Very few, if any, judges would let that happen. Not if they were both honest and know anything about the law.
fishwax
(29,148 posts)that won't get him off the hook for state charges, though.
jcgoldie
(11,610 posts)Not a legal expert but given the current scotus my uneducated guess is odds in his favor.
NY state will still get him...