Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spooky3

(34,403 posts)
Mon Nov 23, 2020, 05:57 PM Nov 2020

No, Nicolle Wallace; Gore's concession did NOT "convey legitimacy"

on W’s presidency. Because of the disastrously bad 5-4 USSC decision, he will always be an illegitimate president.

Please find a better reason to criticize Trump’s refusal to concede.

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No, Nicolle Wallace; Gore's concession did NOT "convey legitimacy" (Original Post) spooky3 Nov 2020 OP
oh man Skittles Nov 2020 #1
Yes. I was appalled. She acknowledged that she was sure spooky3 Nov 2020 #3
I NEVER accepted that bastard as legit Skittles Nov 2020 #8
Agreed! Nt spooky3 Nov 2020 #11
She's a Bushie. Of course she says that. LakeArenal Nov 2020 #2
No it conveyed proof that Gore cared more for America than he did for himself. bullimiami Nov 2020 #4
Exactly still_one Nov 2020 #6
Yes. America's democratic stability the overwhelming priority. Hortensis Nov 2020 #17
once a repub, always a repub NRaleighLiberal Nov 2020 #5
That was outrageous, and I usually like her. MoonRiver Nov 2020 #7
Ditto - and self-serving and dismissive of thoughtful people. Nt spooky3 Nov 2020 #9
As always... melman Nov 2020 #10
That does some to be a very hip, though wholly unsupported, opinion. LanternWaste Nov 2020 #22
Find me a clip of Nicolle Wallace, Steve Schmidt, Michael Steele...etc criticizing GWB melman Nov 2020 #23
It's because of comments like this Sewa Nov 2020 #12
I disagree. The spirit of Gore's concession absolutely did that. Drunken Irishman Nov 2020 #13
Yes. Gore's concession was the primary source of W's legitimacy. dchill Nov 2020 #14
Yep. grantcart Nov 2020 #15
Yes. This is accurate and an important step for the Still Sensible Nov 2020 #18
It acknowledged the peaceful transition of power after an election, Hortensis Nov 2020 #16
It stings regarding Bush/Gore and frankly more so with Clinton/Trump, but Nicole was right. SunStar Nov 2020 #19
If all the votes had been counted in 2000 gore clearly won questionseverything Nov 2020 #20
Bush should have lost Ohio and 2004 RANDYWILDMAN Nov 2020 #21

spooky3

(34,403 posts)
3. Yes. I was appalled. She acknowledged that she was sure
Mon Nov 23, 2020, 05:59 PM
Nov 2020

she’d get some pushback on Twitter.

Ginsburg’s dissent speaks for many of us (non-lawyers):

https://lithub.com/when-ruth-bader-ginsburg-dissented-in-bush-v-gore/

Skittles

(153,111 posts)
8. I NEVER accepted that bastard as legit
Mon Nov 23, 2020, 06:02 PM
Nov 2020

the repuke SC handed it over to their favored guy, with disastrous results

people still die every day because of that warmongerng piece of shit

 

melman

(7,681 posts)
10. As always...
Mon Nov 23, 2020, 06:03 PM
Nov 2020

The whole point of the Never Trumper scam is to whitewash pre-Trump Republican crimes.

 

melman

(7,681 posts)
23. Find me a clip of Nicolle Wallace, Steve Schmidt, Michael Steele...etc criticizing GWB
Mon Nov 23, 2020, 10:42 PM
Nov 2020

Take your time.

Sewa

(1,250 posts)
12. It's because of comments like this
Mon Nov 23, 2020, 06:06 PM
Nov 2020

that I won’t watch her.

She’s always trying to rehabilitate the Cheney-Bush regime.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
13. I disagree. The spirit of Gore's concession absolutely did that.
Mon Nov 23, 2020, 06:06 PM
Nov 2020

He accepted, publicly anyway, that Bush won. On that alone, it conveyed legitimacy, even if Gore didn't believe it at the time.

Good evening.

Just moments ago, I spoke with George W. Bush and congratulated him on becoming the 43rd president of the United States. And I promised him that I wouldn't call him back this time. I offered to meet with him as soon as possible so that we can start to heal the divisions of the campaign and the contest through which we've just passed.

Almost a century and a half ago, Senator Stephen Douglas told Abraham Lincoln, who had just defeated him for the presidency, "Partisan feeling must yield to patriotism. I'm with you, Mr. President, and God bless you." Well, in that same spirit, I say to President-elect Bush that what remains of partisan rancor must now be put aside, and may God bless his stewardship of this country. Neither he nor I anticipated this long and difficult road. Certainly neither of us wanted it to happen. Yet it came, and now it has ended, resolved, as it must be resolved, through the honored institutions of our democracy.

Over the library of one of our great law schools is inscribed the motto, "Not under man but under God and law." That's the ruling principle of American freedom, the source of our democratic liberties. I've tried to make it my guide throughout this contest, as it has guided America's deliberations of all the complex issues of the past five weeks.

Now the U.S. Supreme Court has spoken. Let there be no doubt, while I strongly disagree with the court's decision, I accept it. I accept the finality of this outcome which will be ratified next Monday in the Electoral College. And tonight, for the sake of our unity as a people and the strength of our democracy, I offer my concession. I also accept my responsibility, which I will discharge unconditionally, to honor the new President-elect and do everything possible to help him bring Americans together in fulfillment of the great vision that our Declaration of Independence defines and that our Constitution affirms and defends.

Let me say how grateful I am to all those who supported me and supported the cause for which we have fought. Tipper and I feel a deep gratitude to Joe and Hadassah Lieberman, who brought passion and high purpose to our partnership and opened new doors, not just for our campaign but for our country.

This has been an extraordinary election. But in one of God's unforeseen paths, this belatedly broken impasse can point us all to a new common ground, for its very closeness can serve to remind us that we are one people with a shared history and a shared destiny. Indeed, that history gives us many examples of contests as hotly debated, as fiercely fought, with their own challenges to the popular will. Other disputes have dragged on for weeks before reaching resolution. And each time, both the victor and the vanquished have accepted the result peacefully and in a spirit of reconciliation.

So let it be with us.

I know that many of my supporters are disappointed. I am too. But our disappointment must be overcome by our love of country.

And I say to our fellow members of the world community, let no one see this contest as a sign of American weakness. The strength of American democracy is shown most clearly through the difficulties it can overcome. Some have expressed concern that the unusual nature of this election might hamper the next president in the conduct of his office. I do not believe it need be so.

President-elect Bush inherits a nation whose citizens will be ready to assist him in the conduct of his large responsibilities. I, personally, will be at his disposal, and I call on all Americans -- I particularly urge all who stood with us -- to unite behind our next president. This is America. Just as we fight hard when the stakes are high, we close ranks and come together when the contest is done. And while there will be time enough to debate our continuing differences, now is the time to recognize that that which unites us is greater than that which divides us. While we yet hold and do not yield our opposing beliefs, there is a higher duty than the one we owe to political party. This is America and we put country before party; we will stand together behind our new president.

As for what I'll do next, I don't know the answer to that one yet. Like many of you, I'm looking forward to spending the holidays with family and old friends. I know I'll spend time in Tennessee and mend some fences, literally and figuratively.

Some have asked whether I have any regrets, and I do have one regret: that I didn't get the chance to stay and fight for the American people over the next four years, especially for those who need burdens lifted and barriers removed, especially for those who feel their voices have not been heard. I heard you. And I will not forget.

I've seen America in this campaign, and I like what I see. It's worth fighting for and that's a fight I'll never stop. As for the battle that ends tonight, I do believe, as my father once said, that "No matter how hard the loss, defeat might serve as well as victory to shape the soul and let the glory out."

So for me this campaign ends as it began: with the love of Tipper and our family; with faith in God and in the country I have been so proud to serve, from Vietnam to the vice presidency; and with gratitude to our truly tireless campaign staff and volunteers, including all those who worked so hard in Florida for the last 36 days.

Now the political struggle is over and we turn again to the unending struggle for the common good of all Americans and for those multitudes around the world who look to us for leadership in the cause of freedom.

In the words of our great hymn, "America, America": "Let us crown thy good with brotherhood, from sea to shining sea."

And now, my friends, in a phrase I once addressed to others: it's time for me to go.

Thank you, and good night, and God bless America.


I bolded the part that legitimized the victory, even if Gore didn't agree with the ruling by the Supreme Court.

That was a very tough speech by Gore but one he had to give for the same very reason we want Trump to: the legitimacy of our democracy rests on the idea of concession. Gore accepted the results and on that, Bush's win WAS legitimate to many.

Now you can debate whether Gore made the right move but he clearly knew he needed to legitimize the election and he did.

dchill

(38,441 posts)
14. Yes. Gore's concession was the primary source of W's legitimacy.
Mon Nov 23, 2020, 06:12 PM
Nov 2020

The SCOTUS specious decision certainly was not.

Still Sensible

(2,870 posts)
18. Yes. This is accurate and an important step for the
Mon Nov 23, 2020, 06:29 PM
Nov 2020

continuity of governance at that time. It is in this context that I heard Nicolle's statement.

I fear the lack of such a bridge to continuity from the current asshole will lead to, at best, any number of divisive and dangerous violent acts by small pockets of the Racist Rubes. At worst, a more organized violent response. Either will be handled by the proper authorities, but probably not before much more direct suffering and damage--both personal and political.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
16. It acknowledged the peaceful transition of power after an election,
Mon Nov 23, 2020, 06:18 PM
Nov 2020

though. Protecting the electoral systems of democracy even more important than the results. Same as 2016.

SunStar

(66 posts)
19. It stings regarding Bush/Gore and frankly more so with Clinton/Trump, but Nicole was right.
Mon Nov 23, 2020, 06:37 PM
Nov 2020

With Gore's concession, as Nicole was discussing, it was a speech that spoke much louder about Gore's fine character than it did about Bush, but the effect on the peaceful transition of power was important.

It spoke of our system. When the voting is done, we accept the winner. The losing candidate showing that acceptance is important because it is the ultimate statement of 'for good or ill, this is our president; we must move forward with that fact'. That is the legitimacy that Nicole was speaking of and it matters especially when we don't like it.


While I believe the adverse effect will be greater to Trump's legacy than to Biden, Trump's refusal to concede is not helpful.

questionseverything

(9,645 posts)
20. If all the votes had been counted in 2000 gore clearly won
Mon Nov 23, 2020, 07:02 PM
Nov 2020

There were 275,000 overvotes in Florida and 2/3 were for gore

The machines didn’t count them but if the entire state would have been hand counted for voter intent it would of been clear gore won

An over vote was when gore’s bubble was punched and his name was written in....this happened overwhelmingly in black neighborhoods

Every bad thing since then has happened because we didn’t count the votes correctly

RANDYWILDMAN

(2,664 posts)
21. Bush should have lost Ohio and 2004
Mon Nov 23, 2020, 07:13 PM
Nov 2020

and they we would have seen how gracious W really was.

He was an incompetent idiot and he knew it and so does she...

Gore was an authentic statesman and we just don't have many of those anymore.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No, Nicolle Wallace; Gore...