General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsrepublicans are already coming out saying they will not allow Neera Tanden to lead the Office
of Management and Budget
On what grounds?
She certainly is more than qualified, and served in the Obama administration, so the republican "threats" that they will not vote to confirm has nothing to do with her qualifications or ability
I have no doubt the republicans in the senate will do this with other qualified candidates that President Biden appoints, which highlight what we already know, just how important the Georgia runoffs will be
patricia92243
(12,595 posts)We have learned a few things from Trump.
still_one
(92,141 posts)mitch96
(13,892 posts)onenote
(42,698 posts)Vacancies Act doesn't allow it. it requires that "acting" cabinet heads either be the "first assistant" at the time the vacancy occurred (who would be a Trump appointee), a currently serving official who was confirmed for a different position by the Senate (or a non-confirmed senior official who has served for at least 90 days the year before the vacancy occurred.
Trump named a lot of acting cabinet officials, but with only a couple of exceptions (which were invalidated by the courts), the Vacancies Act was followed.
Lonestarblue
(9,977 posts)Name Neera the assistant director. The director steps down after 90 days and Neera becomes the Acting Director. Does that work?
onenote
(42,698 posts)She'd have to be hired to a senior position that doesn't require confirmation (because if the repubs block her confirmation as director, they'll also block her confirmation as deputy).
If she gets a senior position that doesn't require confirmation and was serving in it for 90 days before a vacancy in the top spot occurs, she might be able to be named acting director. But there are other potential hurdles: the statute governing OMB may have provisions relating to filling a vacancy that supersede the Vacancies Act. And acting appointments come with time limits.
Alpeduez21
(1,751 posts)the rules. It sure was useless the last four years.
onenote
(42,698 posts)Anyone impacted by anything the agency does when headed by someone not legitimately appointed could sue to strike down that action.
Biden's folks are smart enough not to try something that risky.
treestar
(82,383 posts)was enjoined in a lawsuit.
Would Obama era confirmations be good enough?
onenote
(42,698 posts)A previously confirmed official can be named to an acting position only if they are serving in their confirmed position when the vacancy occurs.
This is surely going to be a problem. I just hope Mitch gets blamed as he should, rather than Biden. You just know some on DU are going to say Biden is not being tough enough.
FBaggins
(26,729 posts)I guess their feelings were hurt
still_one
(92,141 posts)bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)based on the discussion I was listening to on NPR this morning.
Botany
(70,496 posts)n/t
still_one
(92,141 posts)confirmation
Do like Donnie did, name her as Acting Director, requiring no Senate confirmation. We can play their game as well.
still_one
(92,141 posts)repugs to shove it
onenote
(42,698 posts)So how was Donnie able to get away with having Acting officials, including Acting Cabinet members ?
onenote
(42,698 posts)such as a deputy secretary position.
spanone
(135,826 posts)CaptainTruth
(6,588 posts)True Blue American
(17,984 posts)Neera spoke harshly about Republican Senators! How dare she?
FSogol
(45,480 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)on confirming incompetent cronies to cabinet, administrations and key positions.
dalton99a
(81,455 posts)He was such a lying partisan asshole that even McCain voted no
kairos12
(12,852 posts)beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)Bradshaw3
(7,513 posts)That's all it takes to make her loathsome to them. Of course they will approve the most loathsome, racist, sexist, unqualified pig drumpf nominated for any post.
cstanleytech
(26,284 posts)President wants to serve in his cabinet?
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)What happened to the President is entitled to choose his own people? I seem to recall that was the standard Republican response no matter how unqualified a nominee was under Trump or Bush. I'm sure the popular media will call out the rank hypocrisy of Republicans, right?
still_one
(92,141 posts)don't think the media will.
George II
(67,782 posts)still_one
(92,141 posts)rickyhall
(4,889 posts)Not all of them, but certainly trump enablers who agreed with him on evidence-free election fraud. Just wondering...
onenote
(42,698 posts)18 USC §2384. Seditious conspiracy
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
18 USC §2385. Advocating overthrow of Government
Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or
Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or
Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.
If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.
As used in this section, the terms "organizes" and "organize", with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.
rickyhall
(4,889 posts)bluestarone
(16,907 posts)How many would it take to vote yes?
dishingtrump
(13 posts)still_one
(92,141 posts)world wide wally
(21,740 posts)a check on Biden"
Guaranteed.
still_one
(92,141 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,133 posts)Tag the GOP Senate a good one, and since it's apparent to all, make it stick
ProudMNDemocrat
(16,784 posts)They have tolerated and coddled Trump with his LIES, Name calling, and BULLYING others willingly.
But when someone tells the TRUTH about them, they get all snooty. Neera will tell them to their faces in her honest answers before the Senate as they show their disdain for her. If she is not confirmed, she wil, have exposed them even further. Neera wins regardless.
Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)still_one
(92,141 posts)Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)Merrick Garland?
MaeScott
(878 posts)Graham needs to be charged with sedition. A few more with insider trading. Knock them out of the Senate. Play hardball.