Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
President Obama receiving 81% of vote in NH Democratic Primary, better than Bush's 79.5% in 2004. (Original Post) jefferson_dem Jan 2012 OP
As long as Randall Terry sharp_stick Jan 2012 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Jan 2012 #3
Can someone tell me WHY Randall Terry would even be running as a D?! FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #7
This is why... one_voice Jan 2012 #16
WTF? But that further begs the question: Why run as a D? He would get MAJOR support as an R. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Jan 2012 #26
I still can't believe no big-name Democrat challenged him in a primary Ter Jan 2012 #2
how many time do you anti Obamites have to be reminded? Sheepshank Jan 2012 #6
I know there won't be any Ter Jan 2012 #18
Perhaps because there is no "bigger name" in the Democratic Party right now... Tarheel_Dem Jan 2012 #24
Because no big-name Democrat wants to be utterly destroyed. TheWraith Jan 2012 #33
ha! bigtree Jan 2012 #4
yup...I'm only getting one message from this Sheepshank Jan 2012 #5
President Obama up to 82% NavyDem Jan 2012 #8
Look out Darcy! Vermin in da houze! jefferson_dem Jan 2012 #9
This picture says it all for me... NavyDem Jan 2012 #10
Epic! Haha! joshcryer Jan 2012 #11
81% vs 79.5%. In NH that adds up to something like 17 more votes. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2012 #12
Actually, it's 82% now and your math is a bit off. jefferson_dem Jan 2012 #13
If I send you money, will you buy a sense of humor? cherokeeprogressive Jan 2012 #14
anyone know how many dems voted in new hampshire?) Windy Jan 2012 #15
Looks to be a tad under 40K right now, with 70% counted NavyDem Jan 2012 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Jan 2012 #28
You mean, "Obama > Bush"? NYC_SKP Jan 2012 #19
Obama's at 82% and Darcy is in 10th place at 0%. :) jenmito Jan 2012 #20
How many candidates ran against Bush in 04? Politicalboi Jan 2012 #21
10 if I'm reading the SoS site correctly. NavyDem Jan 2012 #23
"has 3 X more votes than Darcy Richardson (66)." Tarheel_Dem Jan 2012 #22
If its close, NH 4 electoral votes could be the deciding factor. DCBob Jan 2012 #27
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Jan 2012 #29
Obama won NH easily in 2008. DCBob Jan 2012 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Jan 2012 #31
It sure doesnt feel like 2010 in the rest of the country. DCBob Jan 2012 #32

Response to sharp_stick (Reply #1)

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
16. This is why...
Tue Jan 10, 2012, 11:16 PM
Jan 2012

Super Bowl Viewers Will See Graphic Anti-Abortion Ads With Pictures Of Bloody Fetuses

..... Anti-abortion ads showing graphic images of aborted fetuses covered in blood and surrounded by religious icons will air during the Super Bowl in February, courtesy of Democratic Presidential candidate Randall Terry.

Terry, who has spent a year in jail and been arrested 50 times for his anti-abortion efforts, is using a Federal Election Commission loophole that ensures ads for political candidates cannot be prohibited within 45 days of an election. Apparently, primaries count, so Terry will be running ads on local stations during Super Bowl XLVI February 5.

*snip*

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/01/10/401848/super-bowl-viewers-will-see-graphic-anti-abortion-ads-with-pictures-of-bloody-fetuses/


Response to FarLeftFist (Reply #25)

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
6. how many time do you anti Obamites have to be reminded?
Tue Jan 10, 2012, 10:47 PM
Jan 2012

There will be no credible candidate against Obama......

"I still can't believe....." yeah right.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,222 posts)
24. Perhaps because there is no "bigger name" in the Democratic Party right now...
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 12:06 AM
Jan 2012

than Barack Obama?

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
33. Because no big-name Democrat wants to be utterly destroyed.
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 02:29 PM
Jan 2012

Which, despite the complaints of a very small and very loud group, is exactly what would happen if they ran against a massively popular Democratic President.

NavyDem

(525 posts)
8. President Obama up to 82%
Tue Jan 10, 2012, 10:50 PM
Jan 2012

With 58% of the precincts counted. Darcy with 130 votes, Vermin Supreme with 425 votes. Thus Vermin Supreme appears to be a more viable opponent.

NavyDem

(525 posts)
10. This picture says it all for me...
Tue Jan 10, 2012, 10:58 PM
Jan 2012

Vermin has almost 4x as many votes as Richardson, but yet Richardson is supposed to be a legit candidate...

And since I'm kicking anyway...

President Obama 82%
Vermin Supreme 1% 465 votes
Darcy Richardson 0% 141 votes

63% of precincts counted.

jefferson_dem

(32,683 posts)
13. Actually, it's 82% now and your math is a bit off.
Tue Jan 10, 2012, 11:08 PM
Jan 2012

The point is that President Obama is more popular among NH Democrats today than Bush was among NH Republicans in 2004.

... Sorry.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
14. If I send you money, will you buy a sense of humor?
Tue Jan 10, 2012, 11:10 PM
Jan 2012

I know Obama was the subject of my oh-so-rude insult, but come on... lighten up.

NavyDem

(525 posts)
17. Looks to be a tad under 40K right now, with 70% counted
Tue Jan 10, 2012, 11:19 PM
Jan 2012

I don't know the breakdown of R to D in NH, but it seems that the R turnout is much higher (of course they have an actual primary going on).

Response to Windy (Reply #15)

NavyDem

(525 posts)
23. 10 if I'm reading the SoS site correctly.
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 12:05 AM
Jan 2012

It's got the persons last name, followed by either an "r" or a "d" I counted 10 "r"s.

Edit: Forgot the link:

http://www.sos.nh.gov/presprim2004/rpressum.htm

Tarheel_Dem

(31,222 posts)
22. "has 3 X more votes than Darcy Richardson (66)."
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 12:03 AM
Jan 2012


Hell, I think I could've pulled that off, without much effort.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
27. If its close, NH 4 electoral votes could be the deciding factor.
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 07:17 AM
Jan 2012

I think that's why the O campaign is taking NH seriously.

Response to DCBob (Reply #27)

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
30. Obama won NH easily in 2008.
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 07:31 AM
Jan 2012

He will always be despised by the Repbulicans. The vast majority of Democrats will vote for him. It will come down to the independents. Who knows how they will vote.

Response to DCBob (Reply #30)

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
32. It sure doesnt feel like 2010 in the rest of the country.
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 02:17 PM
Jan 2012

Economy and jobs improving, Democrats feeling more optimistic, teabaggers effect diminishing. I know its not 2008 but it foolish to write off states like NH at this point.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»President Obama receiving...