Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why can we drive a robot on Mars but can't turn a light on in Texas? (Original Post) RAB910 Feb 2021 OP
True. Too true. n/t Laelth Feb 2021 #1
That's why we never have nice things LakeArenal Feb 2021 #2
😁😁👍👍👍👍😊😊😎👏👏 Politicalgolfer Feb 2021 #3
Well said! tblue37 Feb 2021 #4
The federal government ran the Mars mission DavidDvorkin Feb 2021 #5
Nice distinction PJMcK Feb 2021 #14
Those are good DavidDvorkin Feb 2021 #16
Money and greed. procon Feb 2021 #6
Freedumb!!!! moondust Feb 2021 #7
Because there are no republicans on Mars. Perseverance is a Democrat. nt Autumn Feb 2021 #8
Republicans suck. That's why. TeamPooka Feb 2021 #9
Well, Mars lander cost $2.7 Billion and took 7 years. That might be the difference. nt USALiberal Feb 2021 #10
To get where Texas is today took way longer and cost way more... dchill Feb 2021 #11
And Democrats like JFK and LBJ built NASA Bradshaw3 Feb 2021 #12
Freedom hating socialists at NASA meadowlander Feb 2021 #13
Because BeerBarrelPolka Feb 2021 #15

DavidDvorkin

(19,469 posts)
5. The federal government ran the Mars mission
Fri Feb 19, 2021, 01:49 PM
Feb 2021

The state government runs Texas.

Also, a quibble: Engineers ran the Mars misson.

PJMcK

(21,998 posts)
14. Nice distinction
Fri Feb 19, 2021, 04:49 PM
Feb 2021

Years ago, I was friends with an engineer at JPL. When I met her I tried to make a joke about having never before met a rocket scientist. She looked at me disdainfully and said, "I'm a rocket engineer!" I was duly chagrined.

Here are a few topical jokes.

A mathematician, a physicist and an engineer were being interviewed. As part of the process, they were given 2 brass ball bearings, left alone for a while, then asked what they had done.

Mathematician: "I haven't done anything with them, but I've some theories about 2-ness."
Physicist: "I've tried to balance one on the other, and have some ideas about friction."
Engineer: "Er... they broke."

===========

Three hungry cannibals --- who were a chemist, a physicist and an engineer --- found a human thigh bone.

The chemist licked it, and put it in water to try to dissolve it.
The physicist tried to break it open to get at the marrow.
The engineer took it, hit the other two over the head, and ate them.

============

A physicist, engineer and a statistician are out hunting. Suddenly, a deer appears 50 yards away.

The physicist does some basic ballistic calculations, assuming a vacuum, lifts his rifle to a specific angle, and shoots. The bullet lands 5 yards short.

The engineer adds a fudge factor for air resistance, lifts his rifle slightly higher, and shoots. The bullet lands 5 yards long.

The statistician yells "We got him!"

=============


Thanks for reading.

DavidDvorkin

(19,469 posts)
16. Those are good
Fri Feb 19, 2021, 08:20 PM
Feb 2021

I think the distinction is important, and the phrase "rocket science" has bugged me since I first heard it.

procon

(15,805 posts)
6. Money and greed.
Fri Feb 19, 2021, 01:53 PM
Feb 2021

As soon as someone figures out how to bribe scientists and make money off the Mars mission, anything could happen.

We're lucky that our wealthy overlords see a way to profit off the developing technologies and haven't had reason to squelch the program... yet.

Bradshaw3

(7,488 posts)
12. And Democrats like JFK and LBJ built NASA
Fri Feb 19, 2021, 02:47 PM
Feb 2021

Giving it the funding and the why-we-do-it that a new program like that needed.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why can we drive a robot ...