Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(51,080 posts)
Tue Apr 6, 2021, 04:24 PM Apr 2021

"I'm not talking about political contributions": McConnell adds important caveat to corporate threat





https://www.salon.com/2021/04/06/im-not-talking-about-political-contributions-mcconnell-adds-important-caveat-to-corporate-threat/

Republicans are retaliating against corporations that have condemned Georgia's anti-voting law, launching various pressure campaigns and weaponizing legislative threats that would affect Corporate America's bottom line.

On Monday, Sen. Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., accused corporations of siding with the Democrats, expressing that there would be "serious consequences" if companies continued to do so.

"So my warning, if you will, to corporate America is to stay out of politics," McConnell told reporters at a news conference on Tuesday. "It's not what you're designed for. And don't be intimidated by the left into taking up causes that put you right in the middle of one of America's greatest political debates."

"I'm not talking about political contributions," he quickly added. "Most of them contribute to both sides, they have political action committees, that's fine. It's legal, it's appropriate, I support that. I'm talking about taking a position on a highly incendiary issue like this and punishing a community or a state, because you don't like a particular law that passed, I just think it's stupid."

McConnell's threats appear anything but idle, with numerous Republicans calling for boycotts of companies that expressed opposition to Georgia's new law.

*snip*



17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"I'm not talking about political contributions": McConnell adds important caveat to corporate threat (Original Post) Nevilledog Apr 2021 OP
How convenient lame54 Apr 2021 #1
So only actual Free Speech isn't allowed. TheRealNorth Apr 2021 #2
Not even from corporationpeople in the end. 2naSalit Apr 2021 #13
How many loud mouthed right wing CEOs has he ever criticized? nt Carlitos Brigante Apr 2021 #3
"stay out of politics!" ColinC Apr 2021 #4
I imagine Mitch doesn't want to cancel those huge corporate tax cuts either. sop Apr 2021 #5
Shut up and write me a check! rsdsharp Apr 2021 #6
"We just want your money, not your opinions."🐢 Crunchy Frog Apr 2021 #7
Hahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahaha! He's lost his mind! marble falls Apr 2021 #8
Has He Told Pissant Lindell? ProfessorGAC Apr 2021 #9
Voting rights are highly incendiary? notinkansas Apr 2021 #10
I guess it is to the kqkpublican. 2naSalit Apr 2021 #14
Why Do Corps Have PAC's And.... global1 Apr 2021 #11
But, but, but---"money is speech", remember? And, and---"corporations are people", right? Atticus Apr 2021 #12
Lol Faux pas Apr 2021 #15
+1 crickets Apr 2021 #16
What a fucking scumbag. ZonkerHarris Mar 2022 #17

TheRealNorth

(9,478 posts)
2. So only actual Free Speech isn't allowed.
Tue Apr 6, 2021, 04:26 PM
Apr 2021

Got it Goebbels.... er I mean McTurtle.

Someone should ask him about all those small-town businesses with their Trump signs - doesn't staying out of politics apply to them too?

2naSalit

(86,569 posts)
13. Not even from corporationpeople in the end.
Tue Apr 6, 2021, 06:17 PM
Apr 2021

They intend for all life to be under their control. I wish these old fuckers would just all drop dead so we can get to work trying to make our lifestyles survivable.

global1

(25,242 posts)
11. Why Do Corps Have PAC's And....
Tue Apr 6, 2021, 05:12 PM
Apr 2021

why do they fund them. Of course - it's to wield some influence using money. That's political.

You can't have it both ways Moscow Mitch.

Atticus

(15,124 posts)
12. But, but, but---"money is speech", remember? And, and---"corporations are people", right?
Tue Apr 6, 2021, 05:24 PM
Apr 2021

So, aren't you---by Republican standards---saying that corporations can "speak" if that helps Republicans, but not if it helps Democrats?

( You know that "most corporations contribute to both sides" is unadulterated bullshit, don't you, Mitch? )

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"I'm not talking about po...