General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDept. of Awkward Optics: Obama May Move Convention Speech to BofA Stadium
from AlterNet:
Dept. of Awkward Optics: Obama May Move Convention Speech to BofA Stadium
This won't look bad, at all. From Bloomberg:
The almost 74,000-seat home of the Carolina Panthers professional football team would also have room for the convention to sell more floor passes close to the stage. Planners for the event are struggling to meet a $36.6 million fundraising goal, according to the Democrats, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they werent authorized to discuss the matter.
Fortunately, the team isn't totally lacking in self-awareness:
That would be outweighed by the chance to lure more big- dollar contributors, including corporate foundations, to cover the conventions costs, the three Democrats said. The rest of the convention, scheduled to begin Sept. 3, will be conducted at the Time Warner Cable Arena.
The complete piece is at: http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews/article/761539/dept._of_awkward_optics%3A_obama_may_move_convention_speech_to_bofa_stadium/
Response to marmar (Original post)
HereSince1628 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Better Believe It
(18,630 posts)Nothing to see here folks .... move along now!
I'm missing it. From what I read the stadium isn't being donated. We'll still have to rent it.
Better Believe It
(18,630 posts)And I believe they also get some federal money.
doc03
(35,325 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)EC
(12,287 posts)only problem is with the name? I notice on the thread people saying the Dem's are being bought, but from what read, they'll have to rent the stadium. Did I miss something?
ZenLefty
(20,924 posts)It's not uncommon for sports arenas and stadiums to be named after some corporation. They buy the name rights so that their corporate name and logo get mentioned on TV every time a sports game is televised and their logo is on display. Bank of America doesn't actually own the stadium, nor do they necessarily have any sort of interest beyond naming rights.
RC
(25,592 posts)Depending, they can even have a say in how the place is run. Money talks, loudly.
ZenLefty
(20,924 posts)I'm acutely aware what rights are purchased and what comes with the naming rights. In general, the goal is advertising. Corporate logos, signs, how the stadium is referred to when it is mentioned in print or in broadcasts. What color they may paint the walls. What kind of design they can put into the carpet. What kind of artwork gets placed in and around the stadium. So yes, they may have some say in how the place is run. Never came across anything about kickbacks, though.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)It's clear which one is deservedly considered the biggest villain, but do either of these entities have a good reputation?