Why are the Jan 6th terrorists being allowed to bail out after being arrested?

for $2,000

s lot of those being bailed out, were by local judges and the DOJ then appealed to district courts which overturned the decisions.

All the bail approvals are a matter of public record, as are the Judges who approved them.

Additionally, there's the public record of the prosecutors (today reporting to AG Garland) who either approved or objected.

Can you prove Ukraine is now a NATO member?

Have a good afternoon

Many of these defendants look pretty good under them. Many have no criminal record, many have substantial ties to the community. The gravity of the charges can be given some weight, but a judge cannot treat a charge as a fact.

should be included among the criteria?

I expect it does have some effect at the margins, where a decision might go either way, with some judges. Continuing activities have gotten bail revoked, or not extended in instances. Judges have also cited Trump's continuing agitation as grounds to hold people who have said they were just doing what Trump said to do, reasoning that they could well offend again in their obedience.

If they were Muslims now

I’m guessing here. Aside from COVID and keeping numbers lower in custody I’d guess cost of keeping someone for trial has to factor in. Low flight risk - coming from across the country these people do have means but the idea of them fleeing and staying gone seems really low at least to me.

Because the congress critters themselves said, "Oh they look like people we know!" Even as they tear apart the building and smear feces on the walls while screaming KILL PENCE.


Versus scary black people or BLM folk who (supposedly) support looting and such even when peacefully, prayerfully protesting the murder of a fellow human being. WHO obviously need to be pepper sprayed and shot with rubber bullets instead of just ASKED to please vacate this space temporarily.

Why is the length of one's rap sheet a consideration after they participated in a terrorist attack upon this nation?
They are being charged on evidence that can't be refuted. "You were there. We have ock solid evidence that you were there. You took part in a terror attack on the US."

I know that I'll never see the end to this that I desire. That would eithet be life in prison, or execution. Thats my anger at these shitbags talking. However, I don't think they should be freed before this is over.

You asked why and I have given what I understand to be the answer.

Personally, I think all ought to be held, particularly if there are photographs or statements showing the defendant was on the Capitol premises.

On the day in question, the Capitol should been kettled, and everyone inside the cordon charged with mob action.

with misdemeanors and have no priors.

pretty standard to give a reasonable bail if they meet those conditions.

Most I’ve seen have been misdemeanors which explains the bail.

And due process, which is defined in the Constitution, applies to them both.

BTW, no one has been charged with either treason or insurrection.

Were you suggesting that Constitutional due process be suspended for the accused January 6 insurrectionists, just to satisfy some sort of sense of revenge?

That’s what the insurrectionists themselves had planned- just grab Pence, Pelosi and anyone else, and string ‘em up…

How does what the trash did on 1/6 not qualify as treason?
I've read how it's laid out in the Constitution.
I saw treason being committed.

Perhaps you could build a gallows outside the Federal courts with a sign that says “traitors enter here”

There’s a reason we have a Justice system that seeks to remove emotional passion from deciding the fate of the accused…

I, myself, will wait patiently as the accused make their way through the process, and celebrate each time one is sentenced for their crimes. I especially look forward to some of the little fish flipping and testifying against their more prominent conspirators…something unlikely to happen if they were quickly charged with treason and executed, as your OP seems to suggest.

The majority of the charges have been misdemeanors, not treason/insurrection, ergo, these defendants are entitled to have bail set or released on own recognizant with special conditions.

These violent criminals are being coddled by the very government they attacked.

and see if they'll upgrade the charges to treason/insurrection, meanwhile, I'll trust M. Garland's DoJ on their handling of these defendants.

One of the only crimes that is. None of them meet that definition.

Is that a defendant will not be held pending trial. There are two exceptions to the rule. A defendant will be held if the government can establish that he is a flight risk or that he is dangerous I. e. a threat to the community. There was a DC circuit decision over what the idea of 'dangerous' meant in the context of the 1/6 events. It's a little hazy, but apparently it means more than just one time presence at the scene of a violent assault on the Capitol (even if you are in possession of a taser).

Most of those recommend bail for misdemeanor offenses. Same thing in state courtrooms. Virtually nobody charged with a misdemeanor offense is remanded into custody.

Felony offenses have different standards, and things like risk of flight, risk of danger to self or others, and other factors are in play.

Arguments could be made that more felony charges should be made, but charges are up to federal prosecutors, not judges, so the judges take them as they arrive and are charged, and act accordingly.

One thing that is not taken into consideration is outrage by people not directly and immediately affected by the charges that are filed.

Why not charge most of them with insurrection or even treason? Because those charges would not result in a conviction in most cases. Treason, for example, is the only crime mentioned in the Constitution. It is the most serious crime against the state there is. That charge is rarely made, for that reason. Insurrection is not a crime that is well-described, so it is difficult to prosecute.

That's why, to answer your question. Is that a good thing? I don't think so, but that is why. Judicial Guidelines.

... of jail.

Come on people

It is also promulgated in our Constitution.

is that they would be granted bail, but be unable to pay it.

The problem in our system is not that too many white people are granted it and too many Black and Brown aren't, but that bail terms tend to be too onerous for many Black and Brown people to meet.

Bail setting has a checklist of facts and who gets let out “on their own recognizance” is a function of what boxes are checked.

They will at least be put through an embarrassing, maybe job killing ordeal. I want to see the most severe punishment available.

A lot of these people are being released on house arrest with electronic monitoring. We live in an age when this is more common and the technology makes it more secure and frankly cheaper than it used to be.

I guess that's who my beef is with.

I don't think that shit should be walking free.