General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Biden Administration Announced It Will Remove the Hyde Amendment
Today marks a step in the right direction for reproductive rights in the U.S.: The Biden administration announced its plan to remove the Hyde Amendment restriction from government spending bills. The announcement follows Vice President Kamala Harris's remarks at the 2021 Generation Equality Forum in Paris, where she restated the administrations commitment to gender equity and equality. Though President Biden's budget proposal last month revealed they were dropping the policy, Wednesday's announcement reinforces the administration's commitment to making healthcare more accessible.
The announcement has long been anticipated: President Biden pledged to repeal the Hyde Amendments during his campaign. The Hyde Amendment, originally instated in 1976, bars the use of federal funds to pay for abortion except in cases where the woman's life is at risk, or if the pregnancy is a result of incest or rape. This means that many pregnant people, especially those on Medicaid (Medicaid provides coverage to 1 in 5 women of reproductive age), have limited or no reasonable access to care: Approximately one-quarter of women who would have Medicaid-funded abortions instead give birth when this funding is unavailable. We know that the Hyde Amendment exacerbates racial disparities and that it disproportionally impacts women of color's access to care.
Though many Republican leaders are expected to fight the notion in budget negotiations, the removal of Hyde remains an important step in protecting the reproductive rights of people in the U.S., and making abortion access more equitable.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/the-biden-administration-announced-it-will-remove-the-hyde-amendment/ar-AALDJgv
Wounded Bear
(58,634 posts)krispos42
(49,445 posts)The less control women have over their bodies the worse off we all are.
Trueblue1968
(17,203 posts)Aristus
(66,310 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)The time is always right to do the right thing.
wryter2000
(46,032 posts)May I head up the ladies auxiliary?
calimary
(81,194 posts)Diamond_Dog
(31,963 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)boston bean
(36,220 posts)llashram
(6,265 posts)be left out of this. Besides what President Biden faces as POTUS, PRESIDENT Obama faced much, much more ONLY because he is a POC who did not have the backing President Biden has. Even in PRESIDENT Obama's first two years! I remember and study history all the way back to 1619...
boston bean
(36,220 posts)But, women were being harmed. He could have/should have done it. Not sure what is wrong in stating that.
llashram
(6,265 posts)with President Obama and his Presidency:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/sep/16/jimmy-carter-racism-barack-obama
https://www.mediamatters.org/rush-limbaugh/how-years-right-wing-medias-obama-hatred-paved-way-trump
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/racism-in-the-era-of-trump-an-oral-history/
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/barack-obama-first-black-president-us-racism-white-supremacy-donald-trump-a7532206.html
https://remakinghistory.wordpress.com/2020/04/17/barack-obama-a-more-racist-union/
https://humanevents.com/2014/01/20/obama-blames-low-approval-numbers-on-racism/
https://www.dawn.com/news/584584/race-racism-and-opposition-to-obama,
and yet West firmly planted his lips on trump racist rancid ass
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/dec/13/obama-says-racism-us-surfaces-violent-opposition-p/
and on and on
At least ACA is still there to help those who need it. And only because the racists in Congress and on the SC would not have been able to spin the extreme backlash in hurting so many thousands of Americans if they had successfully overturned it. Many of them women, whites and POC.
I am proud of President Obama, even though early in his Presidency I openly wondered why he wasn't doing more. I dug a little deeper...I backed off my criticismI'm done. Many have their criticisms yet many do not acknowledge the major reason President Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama was not as successful as President Roosevelt and his wife First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt.
Eleanor Roosevelt was not openly called the derogatory names that Michelle Obama endured because of her colour. Thank God both President Obama and First Lady Michelle could handle the heat in that kitchen for 8 years of pure Amerikkkan bred racial hate.
I'm done...have a good one
boston bean
(36,220 posts)But none were perfect.
llashram
(6,265 posts)UTUSN
(70,674 posts)crickets
(25,960 posts)SYFROYH
(34,165 posts)alwaysinasnit
(5,063 posts)MustLoveBeagles
(11,587 posts)BradBo
(529 posts)tomorrow happy!!!! Can you imagine whats gonna happen tomorrow? MAGAs and Qs have gone all religious. Its their last defense. They will jump on the anti-abortion train now!!!
And The Pillow Guy is the engineer!
betsuni
(25,451 posts)Hekate
(90,629 posts)Cinnamonspice
(163 posts)It's an amendment. The only thing that can cancel this amendment out is another amendment. The SC will probably overturn it.
malthaussen
(17,184 posts)... it won't be the first time a President disregarded legislation in respect of spending decisions. Constitutionally, it is a bad thing, but it is an almost-traditional form of end run for an Administration now.
-- Mal
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,316 posts)All Biden has to do is submit a budget bill that doesn't have it in it, and it sunsets.
wryter2000
(46,032 posts)Its an amendment to a bill. I know its not an amendment to the Constitution.
lindysalsagal
(20,648 posts)Let's have the courage to make decisions about real-world implications in real people's lives, rather than stone-age superstitions.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,316 posts)spanone
(135,816 posts)Sympthsical
(9,067 posts)Given the increasing restrictions against choice across the country, this is needed more than ever.
The Republican shit fit should be epic.
Red Mountain
(1,730 posts)pansypoo53219
(20,969 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,274 posts)but I think republicans will vote to put Obama on Mt. Rushmore before they will vote to remove the Hyde amendment.
PlanetBev
(4,104 posts)It took guts just for the administration to bring it up. Im sick of the Dems always on the defensive and sick of worrying about whether the Pukes will be outraged. Theyre already outraged all the time anyway.
While Im at it, I should ask my cousins in Chicago to have their dogs piss on Hydes grave.
Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,473 posts)They are saying that the one and only moral issue that counts is abortion. A bunch of them gave Barr an award even after he started pushing for executions of federal prisoners, even though the Pope teaches that capital punishment is intrinsically immoral.