General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRich guys in private spacecraft advertising seats for other rich guys.
The Wrong Stuff.
Elessar Zappa
(13,941 posts)rather than fucking up everything on Earth.
Crunchy Frog
(26,579 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,179 posts).
.
RainCaster
(10,853 posts)THAT would be great karma.
TheBlackAdder
(28,179 posts)DBoon
(22,350 posts)MuseRider
(34,103 posts)I have never heard this. WOW! I am so glad you posted this. Thank you.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I've never heard it before, but I love it!
csziggy
(34,133 posts)But will go to pay skilled workers to do high tech jobs.
Plus, if their rockets go wrong, there will be fewer billionaires polluting the planet. Chances are their billions will be distributed among various heirs, foundations, and other entities.
I see these as "win, win" for the world.
Tribetime
(4,684 posts)And loves free advertising for his next flights of others like him with big egos and too much money. I could care less.
jalan48
(13,852 posts)where climate change has had the least impact. Meanwhile the average citizen is left to deal with the problem. Going into space is just an ego trip for them.
Ocelot II
(115,656 posts)Engineers, tech people and mechanics have jobs. This is a good thing.
tenderfoot
(8,425 posts)rather than vanity travel at the expense of the environment.
Ocelot II
(115,656 posts)A lot of good research and discovery can come from these projects, regardless whether they're done by the government or private enterprises, done for vanity or otherwise.
tenderfoot
(8,425 posts)Such as?
Like humans can't really live there? That being exposed to radiation is not a good thing?
I'm totally down with the space station that's out there now. This on the other hand, absolute waste of time and resources.
I wonder if Branson could see all the sea animals boiling to death from up there?
Sympthsical
(9,054 posts)A lot of tech we take for granted came out of NASA trying to figure things out over the years.
Research for its own sake is a good thing.
Of course the billionaires are doing this out of vanity. But if it helps the human race along a bit, then it isn't the worse thing they could be doing.
MarineCombatEngineer
(12,325 posts)tenderfoot
(8,425 posts)Earth is saved.
Sympthsical
(9,054 posts)And a lot of technology developed could be used for environmental solutions. Better satellites, better programming languages, different energy strategies. Just because it's not obvious on the surface doesn't mean the benefits aren't there.
Here's a neat article about some of the random things that came out of NASA:
https://sports.yahoo.com/25-everyday-items-nasa-invented-225418477.html
I don't get why one would be so down on technological advances, large and small.
PortTack
(32,750 posts)Sympthsical
(9,054 posts)It's not like we're going to start tomorrow.
But I don't see any reason to frown upon long-term thinking.
hunter
(38,309 posts)Wind turbines further entrench our dependence on natural gas.
Every wind turbine requires "backup" power because the wind doesn't blow continuously. This backup power is typically supplied by natural gas. In practice these natural gas plants become the primary source of electricity. (This is why the supposedly "green" Germans are having to make politically dangerous deals with corrupt Russian natural gas suppliers.)
Natural gas is destroying the world as we know it.
If wind turbines were bad for the natural gas industry they wouldn't be building them in Texas.
Engineers and scientists are not a limited resource. We can always make more, encouraging people to become engineers by creating interesting and exciting jobs that actually make the world a better place.
Vanity space programs don't seem like a bad thing to me, especially in comparison to things like natural gas fracking or useless fighter aircraft.
hatrack
(59,583 posts)The Earthrise photograph did, to a degree, drive the realization for many of us of just how small and fragile this planet is, and powered the idea that maybe we should treat it accordingly.
Then again, not holding my breath for such a moment for Bezos, Branson, and their ilk. Not too sure they're wired for revelatory experiences, beyond "Man, I am so FUCKING RICH!!".
edbermac
(15,935 posts)So I really can't knock the guy. If I had the bucks I'd buy a seat.
Stinky The Clown
(67,776 posts)An alternate perspective:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100215612050
hunter
(38,309 posts)Better to fund a vanity space program than a right wing racist political agenda.
Stinky The Clown
(67,776 posts)He was the equivalent of his days' billionaire.
His vanity flight program begat today's commercial air travel.
brooklynite
(94,452 posts)The computer you wrote this complaint on cost several thousand dollars more when the first models came out.
The TV you watched the flight on started out as a device that only wealthy families could afford.
The commercial plane flights you take started out as something only a few people could afford.
As technology and production advances they came within reach of more abs more people. Thats capitalism.
MarineCombatEngineer
(12,325 posts)sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)MarineCombatEngineer
(12,325 posts)It's their money, they can spend it however they want to, if they want to spend it on private space travel, that's their right to do so.
tenderfoot
(8,425 posts)They get avoid paying taxes too.
EX500rider
(10,829 posts)tenderfoot
(8,425 posts)Take that poverty!
EX500rider
(10,829 posts)Blue Origin/Number of employees
3,500
tenderfoot
(8,425 posts)eom
EX500rider
(10,829 posts)tenderfoot
(8,425 posts)guess they should have tried harder in math.
EX500rider
(10,829 posts)I doubt there are many min. wage jobs at those companies.
guess they should have tried harder in math.
Yes a better education can lead to better job opportunities.
DBoon
(22,350 posts)and to show free societies can technically outstrip the Soviet dictatorship.
This mission supports the unbridled egos of the extremely wealthy.
This is how America has changed in the last 60 years.
"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country" has vanished. We now have "winner takes all"
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)BGBD
(3,282 posts)And some fit into that deplorable category.
Response to BGBD (Reply #24)
BannonsLiver This message was self-deleted by its author.
Klaralven
(7,510 posts)Columbus' trip was financed by wealthy backers --
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Christopher-Columbus/The-first-voyage
Marco Polo was not poor --
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marco_Polo
sir pball
(4,739 posts)Klaralven
(7,510 posts)Carteret was granted the north and east part, while Berkley was granted the south and west part.
dalton99a
(81,426 posts)We need to find out what it looks like above 50 miles
WarGamer
(12,423 posts)I'm all for it.
Response to kairos12 (Original post)
BannonsLiver This message was self-deleted by its author.
Klaralven
(7,510 posts)Except that Space Ship One reached over 100 km altitude three times and the X-15 twice -- so they actually made it into space.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceShipOne
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_X-15#Record_flights
KentuckyWoman
(6,679 posts)When airplane travel started it was for rich people. Someone like me could only imagine being on a plane. Now I can afford to fly almost anywhere. Granted I no longer put cardboard in my shoes, but for Americans, I'm in the bottom 3rd economically. I've been lucky enough to use my passport more than once, even though I had to eat lot of Ramen to be able to afford it. ... so to speak.
Maybe it takes 100 years but hopefully this is the start of a new kind of tourism.