Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
52 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rich guys in private spacecraft advertising seats for other rich guys. (Original Post) kairos12 Jul 2021 OP
Better they occupy themselves doing this Elessar Zappa Jul 2021 #1
They can walk and chew gum at the same time. Crunchy Frog Jul 2021 #26
Poof! What was that? My dashcam caught it. TheBlackAdder Jul 2021 #41
I'm waiting for Bezos to crash on reentry RainCaster Jul 2021 #2
While a bug zapper might be quicker, you won't hear the snap & pop. Oh, and no smells. TheBlackAdder Jul 2021 #42
Gil Scott Heron - Whitey's on the Moon DBoon Jul 2021 #3
I do not know how MuseRider Jul 2021 #8
That's great! smirkymonkey Jul 2021 #50
The money they spend on this will not be held in their trusts funds csziggy Jul 2021 #4
My take is he's an egomaniac who loves money Tribetime Jul 2021 #45
What these rich men and women can really do is jet around the world finding places to live jalan48 Jul 2021 #5
They're spending a shit-ton of money, which is being injected into the economy. Ocelot II Jul 2021 #6
If only those engineers and tech were working on projects that involved renewable energy... tenderfoot Jul 2021 #10
I recall the same complaint about the moon landing. Ocelot II Jul 2021 #12
A lot of good research and discovery can come from these projects tenderfoot Jul 2021 #13
Reusable rockets are a game changer Sympthsical Jul 2021 #18
+100. nt MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2021 #19
Oh that's impressive... reusable rockets... tenderfoot Jul 2021 #20
If the human race is to survive, colonization will have to happen Sympthsical Jul 2021 #22
Colonize what?? Living on even the moon is a total pipe dream let alone mars PortTack Jul 2021 #32
As of now, yes Sympthsical Jul 2021 #34
Exactly. Owl Jul 2021 #47
This is better than wind turbines. hunter Jul 2021 #27
I'd thought maybe an Apollo 8 moment was possible . . . hatrack Jul 2021 #7
Grew up during the Apollo era. edbermac Jul 2021 #9
That is a shortsighted view Stinky The Clown Jul 2021 #11
Like you, I don't think this is a bad thing. hunter Jul 2021 #28
Some one pointed out the similarities between now and Howard Hughes. Stinky The Clown Jul 2021 #30
Income envy is always popular... brooklynite Jul 2021 #14
+100. nt MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2021 #17
Our two tiered society has reached it's peak. sarcasmo Jul 2021 #15
Yeah? So? MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2021 #16
At least we know their wealth isn't trickling down. tenderfoot Jul 2021 #21
The people who designed and built the rockets probably do think it trickles down to them. nt EX500rider Jul 2021 #37
An avalanche of wealth! tenderfoot Jul 2021 #38
SpaceX alone has 9,500 employees. EX500rider Jul 2021 #39
BFD, wal-mart has 2.3 million tenderfoot Jul 2021 #40
Feel free to compare the avg salaries between Walmart and the space companies. EX500rider Jul 2021 #43
feel free to notice there are more people that paid a lot less tenderfoot Jul 2021 #44
"feel free to notice there are more people that paid a lot less" EX500rider Jul 2021 #46
The original lunar mission was for national prestige DBoon Jul 2021 #23
+1000 smirkymonkey Jul 2021 #51
Reading through these comments BGBD Jul 2021 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author BannonsLiver Jul 2021 #36
Explorers are generally rich or funded by rich people and wealthy institutions Klaralven Jul 2021 #25
Pennsylvania was founded as a proprietary colony nt sir pball Jul 2021 #31
New Jersey was granted to Sir George Carteret and Lord John Berkley as proprieters Klaralven Jul 2021 #48
They are risking their lives to expand our knowledge dalton99a Jul 2021 #29
If it advances technology for future endeavors... WarGamer Jul 2021 #33
This message was self-deleted by its author BannonsLiver Jul 2021 #35
As a feat, it recapitulates Space Ship One in '04 and the X-15 in '63 Klaralven Jul 2021 #49
I disagree. KentuckyWoman Jul 2021 #52

csziggy

(34,133 posts)
4. The money they spend on this will not be held in their trusts funds
Sun Jul 11, 2021, 11:29 AM
Jul 2021

But will go to pay skilled workers to do high tech jobs.

Plus, if their rockets go wrong, there will be fewer billionaires polluting the planet. Chances are their billions will be distributed among various heirs, foundations, and other entities.

I see these as "win, win" for the world.

Tribetime

(4,684 posts)
45. My take is he's an egomaniac who loves money
Sun Jul 11, 2021, 04:22 PM
Jul 2021

And loves free advertising for his next flights of others like him with big egos and too much money. I could care less.

jalan48

(13,852 posts)
5. What these rich men and women can really do is jet around the world finding places to live
Sun Jul 11, 2021, 11:37 AM
Jul 2021

where climate change has had the least impact. Meanwhile the average citizen is left to deal with the problem. Going into space is just an ego trip for them.

Ocelot II

(115,656 posts)
6. They're spending a shit-ton of money, which is being injected into the economy.
Sun Jul 11, 2021, 11:41 AM
Jul 2021

Engineers, tech people and mechanics have jobs. This is a good thing.

tenderfoot

(8,425 posts)
10. If only those engineers and tech were working on projects that involved renewable energy...
Sun Jul 11, 2021, 11:45 AM
Jul 2021

rather than vanity travel at the expense of the environment.

Ocelot II

(115,656 posts)
12. I recall the same complaint about the moon landing.
Sun Jul 11, 2021, 11:48 AM
Jul 2021

A lot of good research and discovery can come from these projects, regardless whether they're done by the government or private enterprises, done for vanity or otherwise.

tenderfoot

(8,425 posts)
13. A lot of good research and discovery can come from these projects
Sun Jul 11, 2021, 11:53 AM
Jul 2021

Such as?

Like humans can't really live there? That being exposed to radiation is not a good thing?

I'm totally down with the space station that's out there now. This on the other hand, absolute waste of time and resources.

I wonder if Branson could see all the sea animals boiling to death from up there?

Sympthsical

(9,054 posts)
18. Reusable rockets are a game changer
Sun Jul 11, 2021, 12:10 PM
Jul 2021

A lot of tech we take for granted came out of NASA trying to figure things out over the years.

Research for its own sake is a good thing.

Of course the billionaires are doing this out of vanity. But if it helps the human race along a bit, then it isn't the worse thing they could be doing.

Sympthsical

(9,054 posts)
22. If the human race is to survive, colonization will have to happen
Sun Jul 11, 2021, 12:16 PM
Jul 2021

And a lot of technology developed could be used for environmental solutions. Better satellites, better programming languages, different energy strategies. Just because it's not obvious on the surface doesn't mean the benefits aren't there.

Here's a neat article about some of the random things that came out of NASA:

https://sports.yahoo.com/25-everyday-items-nasa-invented-225418477.html

I don't get why one would be so down on technological advances, large and small.

Sympthsical

(9,054 posts)
34. As of now, yes
Sun Jul 11, 2021, 02:23 PM
Jul 2021

It's not like we're going to start tomorrow.

But I don't see any reason to frown upon long-term thinking.

hunter

(38,309 posts)
27. This is better than wind turbines.
Sun Jul 11, 2021, 12:35 PM
Jul 2021

Wind turbines further entrench our dependence on natural gas.

Every wind turbine requires "backup" power because the wind doesn't blow continuously. This backup power is typically supplied by natural gas. In practice these natural gas plants become the primary source of electricity. (This is why the supposedly "green" Germans are having to make politically dangerous deals with corrupt Russian natural gas suppliers.)

Natural gas is destroying the world as we know it.

If wind turbines were bad for the natural gas industry they wouldn't be building them in Texas.

Engineers and scientists are not a limited resource. We can always make more, encouraging people to become engineers by creating interesting and exciting jobs that actually make the world a better place.

Vanity space programs don't seem like a bad thing to me, especially in comparison to things like natural gas fracking or useless fighter aircraft.





hatrack

(59,583 posts)
7. I'd thought maybe an Apollo 8 moment was possible . . .
Sun Jul 11, 2021, 11:43 AM
Jul 2021

The Earthrise photograph did, to a degree, drive the realization for many of us of just how small and fragile this planet is, and powered the idea that maybe we should treat it accordingly.

Then again, not holding my breath for such a moment for Bezos, Branson, and their ilk. Not too sure they're wired for revelatory experiences, beyond "Man, I am so FUCKING RICH!!".

hunter

(38,309 posts)
28. Like you, I don't think this is a bad thing.
Sun Jul 11, 2021, 12:39 PM
Jul 2021

Better to fund a vanity space program than a right wing racist political agenda.

Stinky The Clown

(67,776 posts)
30. Some one pointed out the similarities between now and Howard Hughes.
Sun Jul 11, 2021, 12:53 PM
Jul 2021

He was the equivalent of his days' billionaire.

His vanity flight program begat today's commercial air travel.

brooklynite

(94,452 posts)
14. Income envy is always popular...
Sun Jul 11, 2021, 11:58 AM
Jul 2021

The computer you wrote this complaint on cost several thousand dollars more when the first models came out.

The TV you watched the flight on started out as a device that only wealthy families could afford.

The commercial plane flights you take started out as something only a few people could afford.


As technology and production advances they came within reach of more abs more people. That’s capitalism.

MarineCombatEngineer

(12,325 posts)
16. Yeah? So?
Sun Jul 11, 2021, 12:06 PM
Jul 2021

It's their money, they can spend it however they want to, if they want to spend it on private space travel, that's their right to do so.

tenderfoot

(8,425 posts)
44. feel free to notice there are more people that paid a lot less
Sun Jul 11, 2021, 04:02 PM
Jul 2021

guess they should have tried harder in math.

EX500rider

(10,829 posts)
46. "feel free to notice there are more people that paid a lot less"
Sun Jul 11, 2021, 05:15 PM
Jul 2021

I doubt there are many min. wage jobs at those companies.

guess they should have tried harder in math.
Yes a better education can lead to better job opportunities.

DBoon

(22,350 posts)
23. The original lunar mission was for national prestige
Sun Jul 11, 2021, 12:16 PM
Jul 2021

and to show free societies can technically outstrip the Soviet dictatorship.

This mission supports the unbridled egos of the extremely wealthy.

This is how America has changed in the last 60 years.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country" has vanished. We now have "winner takes all"

Response to BGBD (Reply #24)

 

Klaralven

(7,510 posts)
25. Explorers are generally rich or funded by rich people and wealthy institutions
Sun Jul 11, 2021, 12:33 PM
Jul 2021

Columbus' trip was financed by wealthy backers --

The ships for the first voyage—the Niña, Pinta, and Santa María—were fitted out at Palos, on the Tinto River in Spain. Consortia put together by a royal treasury official and composed mainly of Genoese and Florentine bankers in Sevilla (Seville) provided at least 1,140,000 maravedis to outfit the expedition, and Columbus supplied more than a third of the sum contributed by the king and queen. Queen Isabella did not, then, have to pawn her jewels (a myth first put about by Bartolomé de Las Casas in the 16th century).

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Christopher-Columbus/The-first-voyage

Marco Polo was not poor --
His father, Niccolò Polo, a merchant, traded with the Near East, becoming wealthy and achieving great prestige.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marco_Polo
 

Klaralven

(7,510 posts)
48. New Jersey was granted to Sir George Carteret and Lord John Berkley as proprieters
Sun Jul 11, 2021, 06:43 PM
Jul 2021

Carteret was granted the north and east part, while Berkley was granted the south and west part.

dalton99a

(81,426 posts)
29. They are risking their lives to expand our knowledge
Sun Jul 11, 2021, 12:39 PM
Jul 2021

We need to find out what it looks like above 50 miles

Response to kairos12 (Original post)

 

Klaralven

(7,510 posts)
49. As a feat, it recapitulates Space Ship One in '04 and the X-15 in '63
Sun Jul 11, 2021, 06:50 PM
Jul 2021

Except that Space Ship One reached over 100 km altitude three times and the X-15 twice -- so they actually made it into space.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceShipOne

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_X-15#Record_flights

KentuckyWoman

(6,679 posts)
52. I disagree.
Sun Jul 11, 2021, 08:04 PM
Jul 2021

When airplane travel started it was for rich people. Someone like me could only imagine being on a plane. Now I can afford to fly almost anywhere. Granted I no longer put cardboard in my shoes, but for Americans, I'm in the bottom 3rd economically. I've been lucky enough to use my passport more than once, even though I had to eat lot of Ramen to be able to afford it. ... so to speak.

Maybe it takes 100 years but hopefully this is the start of a new kind of tourism.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rich guys in private spac...