General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDo you have any opinion of Mehdi Hassan?
I have mixed feelings about him. He seems passionate and committed some things I agree with. But also very aggressive almost hostile particularly towards people that don't totally agree with him. Hassan appears to dislike Biden on that basis, though has, grudgingly admitted that he's done some good things.
Me.
(35,454 posts)too much ranting and I don't appreciate his attitude towards the president.
XanaDUer2
(10,534 posts)version of the BBC
Yup, this
H2O Man
(73,506 posts)I don't watch him often. But I don't mind watching someone with a different opion than me. I think he is generally sincere.
ChrisF1961
(457 posts)Thinks he is right about everything and everyone else is wrong.
JoeOtterbein
(7,699 posts)We are used to the soft puffy-fluff questions from American TV news.
It is his job to ask tough questions to every politician. Not just the ones we dislike.
ChrisF1961
(457 posts)and doesnt inject their personal opinion, which Hasan does constantly.
JoeOtterbein
(7,699 posts)Or an example of who, and why that person you think, would do a better job without injecting "their personal opinion"?
ChrisF1961
(457 posts)All Hasan does is inject his personal opinion which is usually anti-Biden and anti-democratic. While he has every right to his opinions, calling him a real journalist is ridiculous.
JoeOtterbein
(7,699 posts)An example would help me understand.
ChrisF1961
(457 posts)and he admits he doesnt like Biden. He said as much tonight to Jen Psaki.
JoeOtterbein
(7,699 posts)But I expect every real journalist to ask tough questions.
Who a journalist likes, or not, is irrelevant. Does the journalist ask tough questions? Mehdi does.
ChrisF1961
(457 posts)His question about Biden ending the filibuster was ridiculous. Thankfully, Psaki schooled him that the filibuster is a Senate procedure and the President doesnt get a vote. Hes not a real journalist.
Nexus2
(1,261 posts)But tonight he labelled himself "not a fan" of Biden. He comes across as one of those folks that thinks Biden has a magic wand he's refusing to wave or should drop everything else to focus totally on what they think is most import. That (IMO) came across really stronger in tonight's appearance.
cachukis
(2,230 posts)ChrisF1961
(457 posts)a commentator, a real journalist. There is a big difference.
madaboutharry
(40,190 posts)He is intolerant and arrogant. Two qualities I dislike in people.
Leith
(7,808 posts)and it comes from an interview he did with Richard Dawkins.
Disclaimer: I'm an atheist and I have been since junior high school. I've been getting more militant about it as I get older.
Piasladic
(1,160 posts)I'd never seen this video before, and like you am becoming more militant as I get older too. I sprang from the womb an atheist (or at least not raised to believe in god/gods since my parents were atheists). People used to call my dad a rabid atheist/feminist and I guess it stuck on me too.
I never really liked Dawkins as a person though. It was fun to see him in this video, but on women, Dawkins could use some help himself.
Leith
(7,808 posts)But the point I hoped to make with the video was that Hassan was a true believer in myths that can not possibly have any basis in fact. I don't care which religion it is, nonsensical beliefs are nonsensical beliefs. He could profess a belief that the world rested on the back of a turtle, or that a guy died and rose from the dead 3 days later, or that the sun goddess loved her reflection in a mirror, or some desert nomad rode a winged horse through near vacuum for 250,000 miles to the moon and split it in two.
Just ffs - don't. Not as part of a news cast.
Piasladic
(1,160 posts)It's odd that anyone believes that the moon was split in two or that winged horse stuff.
Me, I'm more uptight that so many good thinkers are sexist asses.
"For good measure, Dawkins argued that rape victims shouldnt be considered trustworthy if they were drinking."
Link to tweet
Funtatlaguy
(10,862 posts)Wicked smart
His interviews are probing.
He doesnt allow talking points to go unchallenged.
cachukis
(2,230 posts)All journos come from somewhere. I don't need reinforcement of my delusions. I want challenges. Science works that way. He has a testicular fortitude that can be grating. He belongs because he's got backing to his perspective. Raises the level of consciousness.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,551 posts)But I would rather watch five hours of Hassan than 5 minutes of Chuck Todd.
FloridaBlues
(4,005 posts)Time to switch tv
JoeOtterbein
(7,699 posts)...Instead of the 24/7 push-back from the right.
JI7
(89,240 posts)Sneederbunk
(14,278 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(144,924 posts)I love the fact that Hasan tried a hatchet job of Rep. Jim Clyburn and got shot down by Cylburn
Link to tweet
Hasan was evidently hired due to Chris Hayes which is not a positive in my book.
JoeOtterbein
(7,699 posts)...great politicians like Jim Clyburn.
By asking tough questions, he allows Jim to make some great points.
If Jim had weak answers, like every GOP politician does every time, then that argument from that politician would have been the one that what/who was "shot down".
LetMyPeopleVote
(144,924 posts)It was sad. Hasan believes that defund the police is a great idea and and any Democrat who lost due that moronic slogan deserved to lose. Rep. Clyburn disabused Hasan of this stupidity and was clear that defund the police is a truly stupid slogan that cost a good number of good democrats their races in 2020. Clyburn ran over Hasan fairly easily because Hasan was completely wrong on defund the Polce slogan and could not defend this ignorant slogan against Clyburn
JoeOtterbein
(7,699 posts)...Mehdi said he "believes that defund the police is a great idea and and any Democrat who lost due that moronic slogan deserved to lose."
Are you saying Mehdi, "believes that defund the police is a great idea and and any Democrat who lost due that moronic slogan deserved to lose." ?
If so, do you agree or disagree with Mehdi on that statement?
Again, that is not what I heard from the same interview.
Mosby
(16,259 posts)W_HAMILTON
(7,835 posts)Bucky
(53,947 posts)I mean, I agree with most of his opinions. But I prefer telejournalists like Rachel Maddow or Anderson Cooper who stick mostly to facts and analysis. They have their biases too, of course, but they keep them in the back seat
He lacks subtlety and balance.