General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsInventions we use every day that were actually created for space exploration
I have to laugh AT all the whiners who HATE space travel and who ridicule it as being "nothing new" and that "nothing good ever came from it" etc. And then there are those who think that civilian space travel somehow "cheating" and repeating the past because "it's been done before", etc.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/07/08/space-race-inventions-we-use-every-day-were-created-for-space-exploration/39580591/
Despite sending humans to Earth's orbit and the moon, the idea of humans surviving in outer space must seem like science fiction. Creating an environment that can sustain human life in the almost total absence of gravity, as well as no electrical outlets or oxygen, takes a lot of experimentation. Thats been the job of teams of dedicated scientists who have facilitated some of the most unforgettable moments in space exploration.
24/7 Tempo reviewed dozens of modern products that exist because of advancements in the field of space exploration. We compiled 30 common items that were invented for use in the race for space.
Unlike modern inventions we no longer use, these inventions are employed daily to save lives, improve environmental sustainability, and keep humans healthy.
1. Artificial limbs
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
2. Scratch-resistant lenses
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
3. Insulin pump
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
4. Firefighting equipment
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
5. DustBusters
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
6. LASIK
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
7. Shock absorbers for buildings
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
8. Solar cells
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
9. Water filtration
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
10. Better tires
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
11. Wireless headsets
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
12. Adjustable smoke detector
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
13. Invisible braces
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
14. Freeze-dried foods
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
15. Camera phones
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
16. CAT scans
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
17. Baby formula
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
18. Lifeshears
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
19. Grooved pavement
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
20. Air purifier
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
21. Memory foam
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
22. Workout machines
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
23. Home insulation
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
24. Infrared ear thermometers
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
25. Ice-resistant airplanes
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
26. Portable computer
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
27. LEDs
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
28. 3D food printing
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
29. Computer mouse
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
30. Athletic shoes
/snip/ (click link to read this section)
Polly Hennessey
(6,788 posts)multigraincracker
(32,641 posts)Can't forget that one.
unblock
(52,118 posts)Aristus
(66,293 posts)But NASA adopted it because of its light weight in powder form, and because it was easy to reconstitute with water in a spacecraft.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,308 posts)decided as a society that researching the improvement of disabled people's lives should be centered, instead of afterthoughts.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)I think that people who wanted it to be 'centered' would find it difficult to convince anyone to invest the money and research into such a narrowly-focused project. There's always going to be the "glamour" appeal and adventure-appeal that gets people's minds and imaginations going. Space exploration is much more "romantic" (if you will) and the other things will just follow naturally and in the advancing technological wake of all that has come before.
Stinky The Clown
(67,761 posts)Who knew supposedly thinking liberals hold those views to the point of ridicule for the private party efforts.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... I think they're motivated by anti-Bezos and anti-Amazon irrational hatred. But alas, they fall back on the anti-science and anti-space-exploration arguments we heard in the 60's and 70's.
Stinky The Clown
(67,761 posts)lame54
(35,262 posts)A Bond villian origin story
(kind of)
IcyPeas
(21,841 posts)multigraincracker
(32,641 posts)What you can learn with DuckDuckGo
multigraincracker
(32,641 posts)were made for space flights....never got that far.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)They were experts in working with difficult textiles; they brought in some key innovations (that were quite unrelated to lingerie).
multigraincracker
(32,641 posts)lame54
(35,262 posts)Employers should shit all over their employees for the greater good
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)I think liberal thinkers can understand that innovation and regulation can coexist.
lame54
(35,262 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Happy Hoosier
(7,219 posts)And is giving raises above that. They support a national $15/hr minimum wage.
They are not union friendly, so that's not good, but they pay pretty well. So....
lame54
(35,262 posts)Bezo's business model is to create high employee turnover so to not have a "stagnant workforce"
His employees are expendable
Happy Hoosier
(7,219 posts)It's physically demanding, repetitive, boring.
I'm not arguing Bezos is some kind of great guy. But in the hierarchy of shitbirds, he's not near the top IMHO.
Yes, we need to change the narrative about labor rights.
But those poo-pooing this accomplishment are motivated by a dislike for Bezos, not on what the accomplishment actually means.
lame54
(35,262 posts)It's goes beyond not caring
It's deliberate
It's part of the equation
It's his business philosophy
Use them up and spit them out
"You're just mad because he successfully went into space."
Nooooooooooo
I'm mad because he successfully got the world to praise him even though he is a heartless greedy Piece-of-Shit
He is one dick-shaped rocket short of a Bond villian
Oh wait
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)I named (in more general terms) a few of the technologies you mention (thanks for the great list!).
I also mentioned that my job in the commercial satellite biz would not exist without it.
This person said "Are you telling me that those satellites wouldn't be up there without rockets?"
Um, yes.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)This is a person who is usually fairly scientific in their thinking. And has known about my job up close for years.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)What?
...they, they gave us the aqueduct...
Yes, they did give us that, that's true
And sanitation Yes, that too
The aqueduct I'll grant is one
thing the Romans may have done
And the roads, now they're all new
And the great wines too
Well, apart from the wines and fermentation,
And the canals for navigation
Public health for all the nation
Apart from those, which are a plus,
what have the Romans ever done for us?
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)ProfessorGAC
(64,852 posts)...about the work in the 60s, I'm less enthralled by this new effort.
Aside from one of these taking off similar to an airplane, what's unique or novel about this current technology?
In the moon program, they were literally inventing new things out of necessity.
What tech is likely to come out of these current missions that we don't already have?
I'm questioning comparing the 2 initiatives.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Imagine having to throw your car in the crusher after every trip to the grocery store.
Now compare that with the cost of driving one car for 10-20 years worth of errands, commuting, etc.
It's a massive change in the way we operate in space. It changes everything.
And I'm not talking about Space Shuttle style re-usability (which required hundreds of millions and months of effort to refurbish after every flight). I'm talking about taking off again within days, ultimately hours after landing.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)The landing of a rocket... UPRIGHT... on a platform is truly cool.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)ProfessorGAC
(64,852 posts)But, the tech already existed. The government has been working on hyperflight for 30 years or so.
I agree with your premise, but I still don't see anything the world didn't already have.
The willingness to put the money into refinement is, however, a positive
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)The main point is re-usability. It's not to be dismissed as trivial. The government spent billions and billions trying to achieve it with the Shuttle, and never really got there. These guys are radically changing the economics of space travel; Starship is expected to reduce the cost per kilogram of putting something in orbit, by a factor of 100. That sort of quantum shift will transform the global economy into an interplanetary economy.
nolabear
(41,933 posts)I do not get the need to, not exactly ignore it, but to background it behind outrage about other things, as though it means nothing.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)DBoon
(22,340 posts)and NASA should be funded the same percent of the Federal budget as they were in 1968
Then we will start to see even more useful innovations from the space program.
marked50
(1,364 posts)Let's see what wonderful things come of this. Good/Bad/Costly/For those who can Afford/Other
Johnny2X2X
(18,973 posts)Aviation might have driven more at its inception, or more aptly when we started using air planes in war. Everything had to be shrunk down so it would fit in the cockpit and weight less. So hand held radios, small instruments, many composite materials that were lighter. Plastics. Rubber. Radar. GPS. all sorts of technologies arose directly out of aviation.