General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumssop
(10,167 posts)And resisting unionization isn't a good look either. Still, donating $200M to Jose Andres and Van Jones is a good thing.
Response to sop (Reply #1)
Scrivener7 This message was self-deleted by its author.
lame54
(35,287 posts)He gave them each 1/5th of his yacht
comradebillyboy
(10,144 posts)IbogaProject
(2,811 posts)I'm very Angry about the inequities in our tax system, where earned income is taxed higher than "unearned" income. And I'm angry that we don't have a single unified national income tax, where everyone has skin in the game and maybe the first 50,000 in wages or self employment income is taxed lower.
cachukis
(2,234 posts)Mike Nelson
(9,953 posts)...down. Giving a fairly wealthy man a hundred million dollars? For being "Bipartisan" - like when he said nice things about Crooked Donald? I think the money could be used better... pay your taxes, I say, and treat your Amazon workers well. After that, give to people in need, if you are inclined.
Scrivener7
(50,949 posts)Could it have been for that?
Because as a pundit, Jones is ridiculous.
Mike Nelson
(9,953 posts)... I thought it was given to Jones because he was "bipartisan" and liked to "reach across the aisle" - not sure if he said those quoted reasons exactly, or if it was a writer's way of explaining the reason for the award. I was never impressed with Jones' "bipartisan" talk.
Scrivener7
(50,949 posts)Notek
(478 posts)Marrah_Goodman
(1,586 posts)Crunchy Frog
(26,579 posts)Sympthsical
(9,073 posts)So, meh.
I mean, it's nice. But, meh.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Ditto your meh.
tinrobot
(10,895 posts)I do like the fact that he made the awards, but the timing and overly huge amounts smack of desperation.
For some reason, I think he wants people to like him, but has no clue how to do it.