General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJust a thought ...
Pelosi could have pre-emptively preluded Jim Jordan from being named to the January 6th panel by stipulating that appropriate attire must be worn at all meetings and hearings.
The jacket-less jack-off would have been removed from consideration right off the top.
ProfessorGAC
(64,995 posts)RockRaven
(14,958 posts)Of course that rule would have blocked many of the Repukes...
Tbear
(486 posts)Then he would have shown up in a dress and claimed If its appropriate for Nancy then its appropriate for me.
Oh wait that was Rudy in the dress
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Jordan (and his nitwit running buddy whose name I don't care to recall) get the exquisite disappointment of being named to the committee, then having the chair yanked out from under them just as they sit down.
Comfortably_Numb
(3,801 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Jim Banks of Indiana.
Comfortably_Numb
(3,801 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)But sometimes I learn something anyway.
Walleye
(31,008 posts)And Banks. McCarthy appointed them anyway and the Speaker called his bluff, which explains why he was having such a crybaby meltdown. Republicans always underestimate her and they underestimate women in general, especially women in charge who tell them no
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)She knew.
McCarthy wanted a circus - and everyone knows who the top-ranking clowns are in the GOP.
halfulglas
(1,654 posts)He's a troll and an envelope pusher. He would show up for the hearing every single time demanding admission and make a big thing of it. He might even show up in a jacket and take it off during the hearing just to gain admission and disrupt it with his crap. I think Nancy did this her way.
Jon King
(1,910 posts)Hate Jordan but this silly dress up stuff never should have become a thing. Suits are the most uncomfortable and stupid things ever invented, besides the high heel shoe.
People should wear comfortable clothes.