Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe case against Tom Barrack could draw classified material into court
Christina Wilkie @christinawilkie (CNBC)
Link to tweet
A rare legal strategy hangs over the Tom Barrack case: "Graymail" is a defense tactic where defense threatens to reveal classified material as part of the defense. The hope is that prosecutors will drop the case rather than risk state secrets.
It's one strategy out of many the defense could pursue. But this is a rare case where the nature of the charges and the subject matter make it a viable prospect. If a defendant has classified info that proves their innocence, rules get very complicated.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/29/the-case-against-tom-barrack-could-draw-classified-material-into-court.html?__source=sharebar|twitter&par=sharebar
WASHINGTON Tom Barracks defense attorneys have their work cut out for them, given the breadth and specificity of the evidence in the 45-page federal indictment against him filed last week. Prosecutors allege that Barrack secretly took direction from the government of the United Arab Emirates, and used his status as an informal advisor to the Trump White House on Middle East strategy to push for the policies that Emirati officials told him to.
In a case that features a co-defendant who was working for the UAEs intelligence service, and a sensitive subject like U.S. policy in the Middle East, experts say there are several unusual paths the defense could take.
For example, if Barracks lawyers try to argue that the White House knew he was working on behalf of the UAE, the conversations Barrack had with U.S. officials, telling them whom he was working for could contain classified material. In the event they do, theres a chance Barracks defense lawyers could resort to a legal defense tactic called graymail.
Graymail happens when the defense threatens to expose classified government information during the course of a trial, in the hopes of forcing the government to drop the case rather than risk the exposure of potentially damaging state secrets or agents.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 696 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The case against Tom Barrack could draw classified material into court (Original Post)
zuul
Jul 2021
OP
Conversations with the Trump White House could be declassified, redacted if necessary.
lagomorph777
Jul 2021
#6
rsdsharp
(9,140 posts)1. What the fuck was he doing with classified material?
Did he even have a security clearance?
crickets
(25,952 posts)3. 👆 This. nt
Justice matters.
(6,920 posts)4. Maybe "given" to him by his UAE owner$$$?
If so, there must be laws that make that illegal??
Maeve
(42,271 posts)5. Ah, don't you remember? TFG granted clearances to everyone!
He could--and did--ignore the whole system if he felt like it.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)6. Conversations with the Trump White House could be declassified, redacted if necessary.
That would not have to kill the case.
MyOwnPeace
(16,919 posts)7. Oh, you mean like Jared.....
couldn't get clearance but Donnie said it was OK for him to have it?
rsdsharp
(9,140 posts)9. Jared shouldn't have gotten a clearance because he was a security risk,
but at least he was an official member of the administration as a senior advisor to the President. This guy was just a private citizen Trump knew.
Champp
(2,114 posts)2. Yet another Republican intimate-crony pal of the Republican Casino Hustler (TFG)
So many wheeler-dealer Republican crooks. Sad.
MyOwnPeace
(16,919 posts)8. Ah, yes...................
"Only the best....."
NCjack
(10,279 posts)10. Let him reveal all. With the understanding that it will be considered in
setting his sentence.
The only deal for less time that I want from him is all he knows about the Insurrectionist-in-Chief's treasons and other crimes.
Response to zuul (Original post)
NCjack This message was self-deleted by its author.