General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHouse select committee weighing whether to pursue WH call logs. Why weigh??!!
Link to tweet
Just do it. Damn it!
multigraincracker
(32,674 posts)He will be glad to turn them over.
triron
(21,999 posts)former9thward
(31,981 posts)The Biden administration does. The House committee knows the Biden administration would resist turning the logs over because of Executive privilege. So there would be a court fight.
multigraincracker
(32,674 posts)someone might leak them to the NYT or Wash. Post.
Please and thank you.
crickets
(25,962 posts)is an exceptional situation in which the special committee's need for information outweighs confidentiality concerns of the Executive Branch. Biden seems to be trying very hard to stay out of their way. If there's a court fight, the former guy is going to be the one trying to start it.
FoxNewsSucks
(10,429 posts)WTF??? Why the hell would they NOT?
I am so sick of reading about Dems "considering", "weighing", "pondering" and "contemplating" taking decisive action against criminal republicon scum.
I realize that word choice is often the writer's, but I've seen them in TV appearances making the same wishy=-washy statements.
There's nothing to consider or weigh. It happened seven damn months ago and we all saw it. Just fucking DO it.
malaise
(268,941 posts)The Slobfather is going down
Raven123
(4,828 posts)Or they already have the info from other sources.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)What other reason could there possibly be?
GPV
(72,377 posts)gab13by13
(21,309 posts)Kinda like the Senate committee planning to issue "a report" of the Rosen testimony. I expect there will be a mid term test following the issuance of the report the first of next year.
Champp
(2,114 posts)doc03
(35,325 posts)on asking for the security footage at the bank.
crickets
(25,962 posts)but that they may want to do so carefully. The article linked in the tweet gives a lot more info than the headline. It's unclear at this time, but the request may already be in the pipeline.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/06/politics/january-6-committee-investigation-white-house-phone-logs/index.html
The Biden administration has formally declined to assert executive privilege over testimony related to January 6, telling former Justice Department officials in a letter they were free to provide unrestricted testimony, but it remains unclear if that view also applies to records and documents from the Trump White House.
Trump can also assert executive privilege if the committee does ultimately request the records, though Biden would still have the opportunity to overrule him, according to federal regulations for presidential records managed by the National Archives. [snip]
The [White House] Counsels Office conveyed to the Department that President Biden has decided that it would not be appropriate to assert executive privilege with respect to communications with former President Trump and his advisors and staff on matters related to the scope of the Committees proposed interviews, Associate Deputy Attorney General Bradley Weinsheimer wrote in a letter last month.
I had to snip a lot to winnow down to four paragraphs just to address this one aspect of the article. Definitely worth clicking through to read the whole thing.
Mr.Bill
(24,282 posts)and the republicans may take similar action against them in the future.
To them I say: DON'T WORRY ABOUT WHAT THEY WILL DO IN THE FUTURE. FOR FUCK'S SAKE, THEY ALREADY BROKE INTO YOUR OFFICES AND SMEARED SHIT ON THE WALLS.