General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsShould our occupation of Afghanistan been more like that of Japan?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_of_JapanWe were very hands on in Japan, we wrote a sample Constitution that Japan largely took, we approved all of the early officials. For 8 years Japan was directly ruled by the US. We insisted on women having the right to vote. We even made them remove Shinto as the state religion. While we have troops in Japan still, literally no one cares since the last one who died in combat did so in the 1950's. We completely remade Japan and created a stable democracy in a county which had no tradition of democracy. Afghanistan needed to be remade. We clearly didn't manage that at any level. In about 3x as much time we left the country with pretty much no noticeable difference.
underpants
(182,779 posts)Its not really a country and no amount of money will change it.
JohnSJ
(92,169 posts)Sympthsical
(9,073 posts)Japan had been a more or less united entity for a long time.
Afghanistan has always had tribal conflict. It has never had any kind of self-generated unity as a polity.
Trying to enforce a governmental structure on an artificial state is building on quicksand. As soon as you stop holding it up, it'll sink.
JohnSJ
(92,169 posts)Walleye
(31,015 posts)dsc
(52,158 posts)I do think we were more judicious in the use of power but it wasn't lacking.
Walleye
(31,015 posts)Runningdawg
(4,516 posts)irisblue
(32,969 posts)Runningdawg
(4,516 posts)paleotn
(17,911 posts)Japan had a strong, national identity. Plus, Japan rising from a closed, semi feudal society to a first rate global power in such a short time was nothing short of remarkable. In 1945, Japan was as sophisticated and technologically advanced as any nation on earth. A global power, that like Germany, had been bludgeoned to its knees. Literally.
Afghanistan, on the other hand, is barely a country in the typical sense. Outside of Kabul, it's really just a loosely associated bunch of ethnic tribal groups who's primary focus is to be left alone. They simply don't want anything to do with our idea of what they should be. Their power structure is happy the way they are. Been that was since Alexander. Hasn't changed all that much since. And no amount of bludgeoning will change that. The graveyard of empires is best left alone, in my opinion.
dsc
(52,158 posts)and easily the equivalent of France and the UK in terms of power projection and technology. That is quite true.
keithbvadu2
(36,778 posts)In Japan, the emperor said: do it!
ChicagoRonin
(630 posts)For all the reasons previously mentioned and then some. By the wartime period, Japan already had all the trappings of a modern nation: standardized education, electrified infrastructure, public transportation, factories, professional bureaucracy, political parties, etc. The Occupation didn't have to build out any of that (aside from what needed to be REbuilt after wartime bombing). And despite the cultural nationalism that reared its head in Japan during the war, you had a population that readily embraced Western ideas and entertainment, especially in peacetime. During the Korean War, occupied Japan was a very welcoming go-to spot for R&R for American soldiers.
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)No amount of time or showing a way to a better life will change that country...ever.
irisblue
(32,969 posts)I get your line of thought as a jump off, but it doesn't carry through
Hekate
(90,651 posts)dalton99a
(81,455 posts)Voltaire2
(13,022 posts)we should have not invaded and occupied Afghanistan. Problem solved.
GoCubsGo
(32,080 posts)Unlike Japan, we were not at war with Afghanistan, and as far as I know, we are still not. We weren't in there to create a stable democracy. That was just window dressing, so that nobody would notice that it was just another looting of our treasury by the Military Industrial Complex.
dsc
(52,158 posts)they harbored Osama Bin Laden
GoCubsGo
(32,080 posts)Should we have started a war and "remade" them, too?
And, we were at war with Al Qaeda, not Afghanistan.
Voltaire2
(13,022 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)and after losing the war it started against us (causing hundreds of thousands of American casualties), we and our allies required UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER. Allied nations then occupied Japan to make sure Japan would cease to be a threat to other nations.
Btw, just looked out of curiosity, not that it's relevant, but the Allies' occupation army numbered nearly a million.
(For once, we actually have real donuts this morning.)
dsc
(52,158 posts)Britain was there for a short time but left and we forbid Russia and France from taking part. Japan was a much larger country than Afghanistan. I do think hands on would have taken more troops but not a million.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)between nations at full-out war.
Interesting idea that perhaps we should have sent in (somewhat fewer than) a million personnel to completely take over and try to remake an Islamic nation with many parallels to the medieval era into a modern western-style one.
Which reminds me to wonder how Japan's Shintoism and Buddhism and Afghanistan's Sunni Islam might play into the comparison, or lack of it.
betsuni
(25,472 posts)servants or prostitutes. or if they were lucky sold to teahouses to train as geishas. And how Japan forced women, mostly Korean, to be sex slaves (the absurd euphemism "comfort women" ) for soldiers during the war. Today was the anniversary of the surrender of Japan in WW2.
My Japanese mother-in-law had to marry a man she didn't really know in 1958 and was bitter about it for the rest of her life (he was in love with someone who his family considered unacceptable and wasn't happy about it either but they threatened to disown him).
Ugh. All over the world.
JoanofArgh
(14,971 posts)David__77
(23,372 posts)And I dont think the US onesidedly imposed a system on Japan. There were liberal and leftist forces well-established in Japan decades before the end of the war. In Afghanistan leftism has been crushed in part thanks to the US.