General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsScientists say a 'doomsday' variant after delta isn't likely. But here's what's possible
At the very end of a Stanford panel about coronavirus variants last week, someone finally posed the question that seems to haunt everyone now: Just how much worse than the highly infectious delta variant can this virus get?
The answers were both cautiously reassuring and disconcertingly unsatisfying. The doomsday scenario, in which a variant is completely resistant to antibodies and remains highly transmissible, is unlikely, said Arjun Rustagi, an infectious disease fellow at Stanford. But beyond that, many experts were wary about guessing.
This virus has a massive genome. Theres still room for it to play, and its really hard to make predictions on where its going to go, Dr. Catherine Blish, an infectious disease expert and Rustagis mentor, said Wednesday during Stanford grand rounds, an educational panel for medical students and physicians.
In an interview earlier, she was more bluntly averse to making a prediction. We have no idea whats going to happen next. Its hard to imagine it can get much more transmissible than it is with delta, she said. But the only consistency of these past almost two years of pandemic is how often Ive been wrong.
Read more: https://www.sfchronicle.com/health/article/Scientists-say-a-doomsday-variant-after-16386430.php
sheshe2
(83,729 posts)*sigh*
TexasTowelie
(112,101 posts)Sleep well.
sheshe2
(83,729 posts)It is our new fact of life.
MustLoveBeagles
(11,587 posts)TexasTowelie
(112,101 posts)If that doesn't work, then paste the link into a different browser.
I did not encounter a paywall and I'm not a subscriber.
MustLoveBeagles
(11,587 posts)I'll try again tomorrow. Heading for bed.
RainCaster
(10,865 posts)That usually works for me.
nilram
(2,886 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,813 posts)THIS is what needs to be acknowledged from ALL of them.
First they dismissed all sorts of symptoms that people were reporting that WERE caused by COVID-19, thus much of the early infection rate is far under-counted because people were being refused tests. Then they insisted there was no such thing as "asymptomatic" spread. Then in an effort to preserve hard-to-find PPE, they went to the extreme of assuming that COVID-19 virus particles and droplets would almost ALL be less than 0.3 microns and thus "masking" was useless, so don't bother. Then they went to the opposite view to insist that the expelled droplets could not aerosolize at all. Then they all but said that children were immune.
And at the moment, they are sticking with the idiocy about "mild cases" and dismissing them as if they were nothing more than a simple cold or flu, generally pooh-poohing "long haul".