General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBiden needs to hold his military and intelligence advisors to account.
I very much doubt that his advisers argued that the Afghan military and govt. would crumble quickly without US support but Biden decided to order the withdrawal anyways.
While Biden is ultimately responsible and must accept responsibility, he needs to be tough on whoever was advising him as they clearly didn't actually know the situation.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)He seems like a pretty good manager and political mind to me. I will leave this in his hands.
Kaleva
(36,294 posts)If we all adopted the idea that all will be well with Biden, there'd be no reason to discuss anything as he will do the right thing every time.
duforsure
(11,885 posts)By them failing to recognize it, and not advising him of this probability, they failed. It would have played out against the former guy the same way. Those responsible for allowing this to last this long , and politicians to profit from it is what the media needs to now focus on, not what Biden's done. 20 years was a huge mistake.
brewens
(13,566 posts)steal more. Those guys in their army probably wouldn't have been paid anymore. It sounds like they had what they needed, but those guys just decided not to fight.
BumRushDaShow
(128,768 posts)majority party in the Senate when Senator Jeffords switched his
affiliation from Republican to Independent. On June 6, 2001, Senator
Biden was designated Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee. Under
the provisions of S. Res. 8, agreed to January 5, 2001 setting forth
Senate procedure in the 107th Congress, committee memberships reverted
back to their status prior to 12 Noon on January 20, 2001, as reflected
above. Pursuant to section 2 of S. Res. 8, Senators Bill Nelson and
George Allen temporarily lost their committee seats.
COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS
[Membership from close of business on July 10, 2001
until November 20, 2002]
------------
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, Jr., Delaware, Chairman
PAUL S. SARBANES, Maryland JESSE HELMS, North Carolina
CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut RICHARD G. LUGAR, Indiana
JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts CHUCK HAGEL, Nebraska
RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin GORDON H. SMITH, Oregon
PAUL D. WELLSTONE, Minnesota* BILL FRIST, Tennessee
BARBARA BOXER, California LINCOLN D. CHAFEE, Rhode
Island
ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey GEORGE ALLEN, Virginia
BILL NELSON, Florida SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas
JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, West MICHAEL B. ENZI, Wyoming
Virginia
EDWIN K. HALL, Staff Director (through March 22, 2002)
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, Staff Director (beginning April 29, 2002)
PATRICIA A. McNERNEY, Republican Staff Director (beginning June 11,
2001)
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-LEGCAL-84449/html/GPO-LEGCAL-84449.htm
What does the above mean? It means that during 9/11 and the subsequent run up to war, our current President, Joseph R. Biden, was the Chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (taking over from the ASS Jesse Helms once Democrats gained control of the Senate after Jeffords switched parties).
By Helen Dewar
May 30, 2001
Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.) said yesterday that he will head the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and a new Judiciary subcommittee on crime and drugs when Democrats take control of the Senate next week, averting a domino-like upheaval on several major panels. Biden's decision, announced at a news conference in Wilmington, Del., paves the way for Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) to head the Judiciary Committee, which will be at the frontline for action on President Bush's judicial nominations. It also ensures that Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), who faces a tough reelection campaign next year, will become chairman of the Agriculture Committee. Biden, Leahy and Harkin are the ranking Democrats on their respective committees.
An internationalist with a wide-ranging interest in world affairs, Biden will succeed Sen. Jesse Helms (R-N.C.), whose six-year tenure as Foreign Relations chairman has been marked by skepticism of overseas entanglements. Biden, 58, who has served in the Senate for 28 years, has more seniority than any other Democrat on both the Foreign Relations and Judiciary panels and could take the chairmanship of either. He headed Judiciary from 1987 to 1995 and has been the ranking Democrat on Foreign Relations since 1997.
Shortly after Vermont Sen. James M. Jeffords announced last week that he was leaving the Republican Party and becoming an independent, giving Democrats control of the Senate, Biden said he was undecided about which panel he wanted to head, creating some anxiety among colleagues who would be affected. Yesterday Biden said he will, in effect, get the best of both worlds. He will become chairman of Foreign Relations, reflecting his interest in world affairs, while chairing a Judiciary panel that will be reestablished by Leahy to oversee the high-profile domestic issues of crime and drugs.
"Since President Bush took office, I have indicated on many occasions my deep concern about a couple of major issues," Biden said. "Chief among them are the effectiveness of our criminal justice system, the future of the Supreme Court and the administration's plans for a national missile defense." As chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, Biden said yesterday, he will give first priority to scrutinizing Bush's missile defense plans.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2001/05/30/biden-to-head-panel-on-foreign-relations/426ec421-4283-4c90-b0a8-48451cf6f188/
What does this mean? It means he has a DEEP core knowledge about that area, including 20 years of intel amassed during and since that time (he had taken over the Chair again after the 2006 election and then went on to become VP after the 2008 election).
Sometimes I think DU has so focused on Biden as a VP that (outside of the Clarence Thomas/Anita Hill fiasco) people have blanked out the fact that he was actually involved in stuff before becoming VP.
This is his forte. He might not be a John Kerry in terms of diplomatic running around (Kerry eventually took over Chair of that Committee when Biden became VP), but has as much or more knowledge as him in terms of policy.
MLAA
(17,274 posts)After 20 years of effort, if it fell to the Taliban that quickly it would fall just as quickly after a slower withdrawal. If 20 years wasnt enough time to transfer skills, equipment and desire to keep the Taliban away no further amount of time would have been.
Just my opinion, I am not a military strategist or general.
msongs
(67,394 posts)maxrandb
(15,317 posts)He needed to resign as soon as he put his uniform on and pranced over to the "Battle of St. Johns" photo OP with Dipshit Donnie.
I don't care how much he tries to "rehabilitate" his "ragged shit" reputation, he is a disgrace to the uniform, and as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, the withdrawal is his shit-sandwich.
This is a tragic opportunity to remove someone that should have been fired years ago.
FSogol
(45,471 posts)Hope someone investigates all the grifting and back-dealing that occurred. You'll never track it on the Afghan end, but more that half of the theft happened with the Pentagon and military contractors.
Thrill
(19,178 posts)It was time to get out of there. Its not their fault they arent willing to fight for their own country
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Were a superpower, and this is the best we can do?
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)Voltaire2
(12,995 posts)The surprise is all a manufactured outrage theater event for the masses.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,316 posts)Voltaire2
(12,995 posts)by the outrage machine.
Its disappointing that it continues to be so easy to make us dance on command.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,316 posts)Voltaire2
(12,995 posts)care about facts, it uses emotional irrational persuasion techniques.
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)Just last week "senior officials" were "warning that Afghanistan could fall completely under the sway of the Taliban in 30-60 days." It took seven. A month ago Biden himself was expressing confidence in the Afghan army. I mean, sure, what else was he supposed to do, but it's a terrible look. Are Biden and his admin part of the "manipulation," or did they simply not signal correctly to the American people what was about to happen? When you're burning documents, sending troops *back* in to guard escape routes, and sprinting for the runways, it looks to most reasonable people like you were surprised, even if we discount their explicit statements as simply trying to bolster the Afghan army.
Why are so many people surprised? Because the Administration *appears* to have been very much surprised.
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)War. I have three family members who spent time in Afghanistan. I am relieved they wont have to go back.
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)Celerity
(43,287 posts)MSNBC and CNN are wall to wall shredding Biden from so many angles one's mind reels and head spins
marble falls
(57,063 posts)... history about the Russian pullout of Afghanistan, and our pullout of Saigon.
Everybody knew the situation was going to be critical and potentially a disaster, if they've been keeping up on it since 2001. This could have been so much worse.
Joe Biden and DOD and the State Department have done a good job so far of getting us out.
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)This.
Wingus Dingus
(8,052 posts)be chaotic or dangerous or a shitshow. I'm not surprised at all.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Why do you doubt this?
Biden was likely advised this would happen, and would happen regardless of our timetable. At some point, we had to put our feet down and say enough is enough. This was a failure from the get-go. We've already wasted trillions of dollars and thousands of lives on George W.'s sunk cost.
Kaleva
(36,294 posts)JoanofArgh
(14,971 posts)didn't and Ghani fled the country loaded with cash
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)The govenment of Afghanistan ran away as I see it.