General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe US didn't lose the war in Afghanistan, the Afghan government and people did
We shouldnt have been so deeply involved in the first place, at most we should have launched a targeted strike against Al Qaeda in response to the attack on 9/11. Once we went in to Afghanistan we got bogged down in Iraq which clearly was an illegal, unjustified war of Bush/Cheney.
I cant understand all the hand wringing and blame casting over the fall of Afghanistan. What were we to do? We spent twenty years trying to establish a working government and a military that could defend itself. I feel bad for the people who will have to live under a Taliban regime, but enough is enough. No more American soldiers should die in that pitiful country.
abqtommy
(14,118 posts)Rustyeye77
(2,736 posts)I cant say how I feel about your post.
no_hypocrisy
(46,057 posts)cinematicdiversions
(1,969 posts)Trueblue Texan
(2,424 posts)...but I knew we'd see a pullout of Afghanistan that looks like it does today. It was a bad strategy from the beginning, doomed to failure. I applaud Joe Biden for finally ripping off the band-aid.
Rustyeye77
(2,736 posts)Interesting analogy . Maybe ripping something out.
Cosmocat
(14,560 posts)All of us were terrorist loving scumbags when we were screaming about how this was going to turn out.
But, the Rs will N E V E R admit to being wrong about anything, and the country at large just can't get enough of happily letting the children bully us into one disaster after the next.
Jon King
(1,910 posts)Who has been giving the President such awful intelligence? Why did he think as of July 9th that "the Taliban's chances of ever taking over the country are minimal". Who decided on the timing and process for Visas for all the Afghan helpers based on this intelliigence?
These are questions that must be answered.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,311 posts)I think it was denial and wishful thinking.
mopinko
(70,067 posts)they're worse than cops.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)atreides1
(16,068 posts)"some Afghan forces realized they would soon no longer be able to count on American air power and other crucial battlefield support and grew receptive to the Taliban's approaches,"
dsp3000
(482 posts)I dont understand why people on this forum are so blind to this fact
Vinca
(50,248 posts)300,000 Afghan fighters. 3,500 American troops. 75,000 Taliban fighters. Should our removal of 3,500 make a difference if that 300,000 want a free country???? Fuck the GOP if they try to use this politically. It was their lord and savior DJT who made the arrangements via Pompeo directly with the Taliban (excluding the official Afghan government). A confab and conference with the Taliban attending was planned at Camp David and it was supposed to end with a Nobel Prize winning ceremony. In the end, Trump was cowed by the generals and caved. What a surprise. I say good for Biden for having the balls to say "Enough."
Biden had the balls to end this.
littlemissmartypants
(22,628 posts)NH Ethylene
(30,806 posts)niyad
(113,205 posts)Lulu KC
(2,565 posts)Sugarcoated
(7,721 posts)but amongst the people I know, and from what I read in the social media I follow, more folks seem to be happy about us leaving.
rainy
(6,089 posts)Where are the men? What do they have to say about women and children and their rights and freedoms? They are the ones that have failed the country and until they believe women should be free women will not be free. End of discussion.
Nexus2
(1,261 posts)She's really tearing to him this morning. A correspondent was just reporting on the events and she basically ignored the facts that pointed at what might have driven Biden's decsion aside from reckless stubbornness and ignoring his advisors to continue taking shots.
Did she ignore the fact that Trump signed an agreement with the Taliban last year, to release Taliban prisoners and pledged all troops out of Afghanistan by May 1, 2021?
snowybirdie
(5,221 posts)the channel this a.m. Poor Mika was almost in tears about all her friends in Afghanistan who will be arrested tomorrow. Come on! I'd bet the farm she knows no one there except NBC correspondents.
Magoo48
(4,700 posts)Last edited Mon Aug 16, 2021, 08:38 AM - Edit history (1)
In our time of grief and national anger, following an attack upon us, an attack precipitated by decades of meddling and exploitation in the Middle East, the MIC and its political dogs jumped at the opportunity to sell us down this inevitable dead end road.
Now, comes the spin, the blame, the denial, and the rewriting of history.
Then, comes the years of platitudes as we underserve our damaged warriors and their broken lives.
Finally, we ignore the lessons and forget until it all repeats.
Scrivener7
(50,932 posts)That wasn't enough.
We shouldn't have been there in the first place, but we certainly shouldn't be staying there because that wasn't enough.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Someone has a lot to answer for.
The withdraw could have been a year after we went in or 100 years after we went in.
The withdraw could have been done over 1 week or 10 years.
The withdraw could have been done anyone of a million ways and ...
It would have ended like this.
There is a reason W didn't end the mess he started, and 45 for all his big talk didn't fully pull the plug either.
As usual, Rs left a D to be the adult and suffer the consequences.
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)mainer
(12,022 posts)The Afghan army had more weapons and more soldiers than the Taliban. They just gave up and handed those weapons to the enemy.
HariSeldon
(455 posts)America should have insisted on many all-female platoons in the Afghani army. The men of the army have little to lose by deserting, but the women, intrinsically to the nature of the Taliban, have so much more to fight for.
mopinko
(70,067 posts)there are women warriors all over the middle east. i wonder who didnt think this was a good idea.
cuz i bet someone came up w it. it just got shot down.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)they were Afghani's too.
CrackityJones75
(2,403 posts)A regime that treats women like that should be EVERYONES enemy.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)India, Pakistan, African Continent, Middle East, etc........even here.
CrackityJones75
(2,403 posts)I just dont think that we can take them all on militarily. That doesnt work.
Only educating works. But that is damn near as difficult.
sarge43
(28,941 posts)When in the past 2000 years plus has foreign intervention in Afghanistan ever been successful?
Yeah, a few hung in there for at best four or five generations, but eventually they slung out or became Afghans.
Among other things, American Exceptionalism got us into this mess. "Everybody wants to be just us! USA!" No, they don't.
It is the doom of men that they forget.
Voltaire2
(12,977 posts)We lost this war 20 years ago when we decided that a punitive expedition against al qaeda bases ought to instead be a conquest and occupation mission.
LittleGirl
(8,282 posts)Where was the plan to start this? Or end it?
Afghans needed to run their own country. They might as well close themselves off and try their own way.
Aussie105
(5,364 posts)Invaders wanting to impose their values on them?
With the 'invaders' gone, Afghanistan needs to develop it's own form of civilization.
We may not like the end product, but with the 'invaders' gone, and not providing a pretext for different tribes to band together to fight them, what next?
The Taliban have many values that we don't approve of. But maybe from the left behind mess, leadership may arise that can actually run the country effectively?
American soldiers fighting and dying on foreign soil for abstract ideological reasons was never a good idea. Solves little.
snowybirdie
(5,221 posts)So correct.
Joinfortmill
(14,404 posts)stewrat
(50 posts)Devil Child
(2,728 posts)No matter how you try to rationalize. Best to accept this unconditionally. Efforts to place the blame onto the Afghan people just helps fuel the belief we will get it right next time.
Snackshack
(2,541 posts)Did the only thing he could do. Surging 25,-50,000 more troops was not an option, a commitment on generational timelines was not an option. Granted I dont think President Biden anticipated same day Taliban action. Im guessing that is not in the deal Trump made w/ the Taliban.
Certainly there are questions that need to be answered. I just hope it does not turn out to be a case of intentional sabatoge by officials held over from the previous admin but it would not surprise me after witnessing the actions of the GOP in regards to COVID and the resurgence happening right now.
Texaswitchy
(2,962 posts)Hold overs making decisions.
Lulu KC
(2,565 posts)I hadn't considered that possibility.
Groaningly yours,
DallasNE
(7,402 posts)Trump took a weak negotiating hand and made it worse by not keeping his mouth shut while the talks were going on. Talks that gave the Taliban instant credibility. Here is a long article on how not to do it.
https://www.npr.org/2021/03/04/973604904/trumps-deal-to-end-war-in-afghanistan-leaves-biden-with-a-terrible-situation?fbclid=IwAR3ZVYJfYKd2Uu1kZ-fkc_Kq-5VpaCK-ZxaVAZXEgUXKs38z4kOY8i60hbU
usaf-vet
(6,178 posts)Secondly, from the outset, we have wanted to establish a democracy in Afghanistan. American democracy is not a universal value. The Afghans do not want our democracy; they do not want our culture, which they see as filled with pornography and the refutation of all their religious and cultural values.
https://bigthink.com/learning-from-the-past/afghanistan-the-lessons-of-history