General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCalifornia boy dies of rare brain-eating amoeba after swimming in lake
RED BLUFF, Calif. A child infected with an extremely rare brain-eating amoeba while swimming in a Northern California lake died in a hospital, his family confirmed Friday.
David Pruitt, 7, of Tehama County, died from primary amoebic meningoencephalitis, or PAM, on Aug. 7, said his aunt, Crystal Hayley.
The boy was rushed to the emergency room on July 30 and then flown to UC Davis Medical Center where he was on life support with severe brain swelling, Hayley said in a fundraising site she created for the family to raise funds for his care and funeral.
The infection is extremely rare, and there have only been 10 cases reported in California since 1971, the Tehama County Health Services Agency said in an Aug. 4 news release. It said the boy was likely infected in a lake in Tehama County but didnt identify the boy or say where he got infected. ..............(more)
https://www.freep.com/story/news/nation/2021/08/15/7-year-old-california-boy-dies-brain-eating-amoeba-swimming/8144701002/
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,700 posts)notinkansas
(1,096 posts)to provide the name of that lake.
The_REAL_Ecumenist
(719 posts)Last edited Mon Aug 16, 2021, 12:18 PM - Edit history (1)
that they refuse to name the lake because it's a county chockful of idiots that kiss republican ass like they were platinum plated. It also has horrifically high rates of tweakers, in fact, when we bought our acreage, we were warned not to leave our vehicle unoccupied when stopping at the local convenience store because we would come out to find it stripped. It's BAD! They're only concerned about money, "tourism" & appearances. Doubtlessly, more people will get infected and this time, their families will sue the living f#$k out of all the people who decided that, the county & everyne else who made this murderous decision.
Ms. Toad
(34,062 posts)Given that there have only been 10 since 1971. If it was the lake itself, there would likely have been significantly more infections.
(That's not to say I would head out there for a swim anytime soon, but it doesn't seem like something that is a significant risk in that particular lake - or in any lake where one of the prior 10 incidents happen.)
Doing a bit more research - it seems like a risk for hot springs, so this seems even more unusual since there isn't any mention of the lake being a hot spring.
I couldn't find the entire list of prior incidents - but here is the oldest, and the 9th, I believe:
2018: Inyo County, in the Eastern Sierra region of California
1971: Desert hot spring in southern California - 1st incident
sir pball
(4,741 posts)It's easily found in shallow, warm-to-hot (above 80°F) freshwater; odds are if you've ever been swimming in a pond that warm, you've been around the amoeba. I know in the South, any "wild" water is considered contaminated and wearing noseplugs is a must; I'd simply assume the same for any water in the county this occured in.
notinkansas
(1,096 posts)most people probably don't reason about those odds. The water was described as a lake, which people would reasonably expect to be safer than a pond. It really should be specifically identified.
sir pball
(4,741 posts)Naming one body of water will lead people to believe others may be safer, when the reality is that this part of California has likely warmed up enough so that Nagleria has colonized the watwrways.
A PSA should be released stating that *all* untreated bodies of water in the area are potential Nagleria sources and anyone swimming in *any* untreated water, not just one specific body, should take appropriate precautions.
notinkansas
(1,096 posts)A blanket notification sounds like a great idea - in conjunction with naming the body of water already found to be dangerous.
Ms. Toad
(34,062 posts)It is present in all of the hot springs in California, and in other parts of the world, and incidents appear to be extremely rare - even in the hot springs known to have the amoeba. Naming this specific body of water serves little purpose, since its rarity - even though the amoeba are not rare - seems to suggest it is presence of the amoeba + something else.
sir pball
(4,741 posts)The amoeba invades the brain through the smell receptors; there have been a couple of cases linked to using neti pots with non-sterile water. Kids usually get it because their bone structure that houses the smell neurons is less developed, so the amoeba has an easier time crossing over - plus they're far more likely to be jumping in the water in a way that can ram it up their noses. The most common preventative that I've heard of is to hold your nose while jumping in, or even better wear a nose clip.
And if you do get untreated water deep in your nose, enough to feel it, be hyper-vigilant to early symptoms - a major reason the disease is 99.5% deadly is the early phase is just a headache and stiff neck, by the time it gets serious, your brain is already a bloody, pulpy mess.
sir pball
(4,741 posts)No objection to naming the specific lake so long as it's made clear that any other surface water is also assumed tainted; I just would have hated to see people flock to a "safe alternative" that was anything but. Probably best to just get the TX or FL health departments' advice, it's endemic there so they probably know how to effectively educate the public.
And on that note...na zdrowie!
notinkansas
(1,096 posts)Sympthsical
(9,072 posts)I'm a hiking type and bounce around here and there. You sometimes see signs posted at lakes - especially smaller ones - that will warn that it is not entirely safe to swim in there because of bacteria, etc., and you're assuming some risk by doing so.
Of course, in the summer, you'll see tons of people in the things.
Beetwasher.
(2,970 posts)Damn damn damn. Poor family, just random, cruel tragedy.
Vogon_Glory
(9,117 posts)They like warm water. I fear that as summer temperatures climb higher because of global warming, such incidents will become more common.