General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy wasn't the release of 5000 taliban prisoners last year a big story
I dont remember hearing it or the media covering it. Thats why I cant stand the media. This story should have been a big deal. The media is so up in arms on what happened this week, where were they last year when this happened?
onecaliberal
(32,822 posts)Claustrum
(4,845 posts)And I truly think Trump and the GOP kept the story quiet.
USAFRetired_Liberal
(4,167 posts)They can only cover one story at a time. Their attention span (just like most Americans) is so short.
wnylib
(21,428 posts)The difference is in age level. He acts like a pouty, demanding toddler. The media act like middle school kids, hyped up on the latest gossip story, totally lacking in emotional and intellectual depth.
JI7
(89,247 posts)repeatedly.
NullTuples
(6,017 posts)That would've been when we were all riveted to the news following the Plague Ship.
Excellent distraction; well played.
RockRaven
(14,958 posts)whatever draws more ratings, views, clicks to maximize ad revenue. That prisoner release was a boring detail, an esoteric in-the-weeds kind of thing for wonky policy nerds, or whatever they had to tell themselves to justify instead airing yet another story about Hunter Biden's laptop, or what the former guy was tweeting that day, etc.
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)Did Richard Engel cover this? He seemed to be living in Afghanistan at the time.
Budi
(15,325 posts)THAT was kind of a BFD.
DanieRains
(4,619 posts)You won Taliban. Now don't make me look bad for a while and I'll let you have the women.
Something like that.
moondust
(19,972 posts)Or did TFG & Co. keep it hidden from them/us?
tableturner
(1,680 posts)Cha
(297,137 posts)Cha
(297,137 posts)Link to tweet
First I've heard of it.. 'course I don't see everything.
Where was the "media" feeding frenzy outrage over This?!
Uncle Joe
(58,349 posts)The Pentagon, Intelligence community have known Afghanistan is unwinnable for years.
So they worked out a withdrawal of U.S. forces deal with release of the Taliban prisoners in advance and I imagine some security deals or specifics of cooperation at the very least to which still haven't been disclosed as of yet.
My belief is that the airport will still be allowed to take people out for perhaps a couple of weeks or so even with the Taliban in control of Kabul as a show of good will.
Escurumbele
(3,386 posts)All the dead, afghans, Iraqis, USA soldiers were only collateral damage to them.
Halliburton made a killing. I have friends who worked in Iraq for Halliburton doing laundry, they had salaries close to $100,000.00, imagine how much Halliburton charged.
They were not interested in winning the invasions, there is a reason why SOB Donald Rumsfeld sent few soldiers, ill equipped, so to try to blame anything on the Democrats is ludicrous.
Response to USAFRetired_Liberal (Original post)
ancianita This message was self-deleted by its author.
ancianita
(36,023 posts)so he likely kept the bromance 'played down' -- until the Taliban blew up a car, killed an American, and blew up Trump's plans to bring Pres. Ashraf Ghani and his Taliban bros together.
This long report is a pretty good explanation of events during a covid year that preoccupied much of media.
The Americans were also rushing to finalize outstanding issues in the days before the last-minute proposed Camp David meeting. Among the most significant was a disagreement over the release of thousands of Taliban prisoners in Afghan prisons.
Afghan officials said the Americans had taken the liberty of negotiating on their behalf by agreeing to the release. Mr. Ghanis government found that unacceptable, saying it would agree only if the Taliban reciprocated with an extensive cease-fire something the insurgents are reluctant to do at this stage of the talks since violence is their main leverage.
The final negotiations occurred during a period of intensifying bloodshed. In response to Taliban attacks, American negotiators made clear they were prioritizing the agreement, not looking to boycott the talks. Their negotiations were undergirded by increasing battlefield pressure by the American military.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/08/world/asia/afghanistan-trump-camp-david-taliban.html
IcyPeas
(21,857 posts)There were 2 threads that I found by the same OP author.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100213037828
orleans
(34,049 posts)i googled after reading this thread.
nytimes article in august 2020
i remember the covid aspect of the piece (near the end of article). the big picture? not so much.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/09/world/asia/afghanistan-taliban-prisoners-peace-talks.html
Willto
(292 posts)Why wasn't the release of 5000 taliban prisoners last year a big story
Because with a train wreck like Trump in office that story was just a slow Tuesday.
That's how he's always gotten away with so much. He's a shitstorm of corruption and malice and by the time the proper authorities decide to launch an investigation of one misdeed, he's committed hundreds more.
48656c6c6f20
(7,638 posts)Were so numerous it became mind numbing.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)the same stories over and over and over and over, usually with the same general themes. Then they move to a new set.
Of course this was covered by news sources, MANY of them. And many millions of people who read and listen to them knew about this.
I think it's unfair to "can't stand" "the media." As if they were all the same. We're each in charge of which media we watch and which we don't consider worth our attention.