Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kid Berwyn

(14,797 posts)
Sat Aug 21, 2021, 01:44 PM Aug 2021

How Bush Was Offered Bin Laden and Blew It

Here’s the buried story of Afghanistan.



How Bush Was Offered Bin Laden and Blew It

BY JEFFREY ST. CLAIR - ALEXANDER COCKBURN
CounterPunch.org, NOVEMBER 1, 2004

George Bush, the man whose prime campaign plank has been his ability to wage war on terror, could have had Osama bin Laden’s head handed to him on a platter on his very first day in office, and the offer held good until February 2 of 2002. This is the charge leveled by an Afghan American who had been retained by the US government as an intermediary between the Taliban and both the Clinton and Bush administrations.

Kabir Mohabbat is a 48-year businessman in Houston, Texas. Born in Paktia province in southern Afghanistan, he’s from the Jaji clan (from which also came Afghanistan’s last king). Educated at St Louis University, he spent much of the 1980s supervising foreign relations for the Afghan mujahiddeen, where he developed extensive contacts with the US foreign policy establishment, also with senior members of the Taliban.

After the eviction of the Soviets, Mohabbat returned to the United States to develop an export business with Afghanistan and became a US citizen. Figuring in his extensive dealings with the Taliban in the late 1990s was much investment of time and effort for a contract to develop the proposed oil pipeline through northern Afghanistan.

Snip…

By the end of 1999 US sanctions and near-world-wide political ostracism were costing the Taliban dearly and they had come to see Osama bin Laden and his training camps as, in Mohabbat’s words, “just a damn liability”. Mohabbat says the Taliban leadership had also been informed in the clearest possible terms by a US diplomat that if any US citizen was harmed as a consequence of an Al Qaeda action, the US would hold the Taliban responsible and target Mullah Omar and the Taliban leaders.

In the summer of 2000, on one of his regular trips to Afghanistan, Mohabbat had a summit session with the Taliban high command in Kandahar. They asked him to arrange a meeting with appropriate officials in the European Union, to broker a way in which they could hand over Osama bin Laden . Mohabbat recommended they send bin Laden to the World Criminal Court in the Hague.

Continues…

https://www.counterpunch.org/2004/11/01/how-bush-was-offered-bin-laden-and-blew-it/

Link to marquee photo story: https://californianewstimes.com/oakland-grand-lake-theater-marquee-says-afghanistan-iraq-is-bush-cheney-war-criminals-legacy-oakland-news-now/491220/

Bottom line: Afghans offered to turn over bin Laden and Bush-n-Cheney declined.

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Kid Berwyn

(14,797 posts)
2. Former Saudi ambassador Prince Bandar refuses to testify about what he knows of 9/11
Sat Aug 21, 2021, 01:59 PM
Aug 2021


By Dan Christensen
August, 2021 FloridaBulldog.org

During his 22 years as Saudi Arabia’s top diplomat in Washington, His Royal Highness Prince Bandar bin Sultan was a powerful influencer in the U.S., dealing with five presidents, 10 secretaries of state, 11 national security advisors and 16 sessions of Congress. He was close enough to both Presidents Bush that he earned the nickname Bandar Bush.

Bandar was ambassador on Sept. 11, 2001 when 15 of his countrymen and four other al Qaeda terrorists hijacked four California-bound commercial airliners from airports in Boston, Newark and suburban Washington, D.C. and crashed them into New York’s World Trade Center, the Pentagon and, after passengers intervened, a field near Shanksville, PA. Two days later, Bandar was photographed relaxing on the Truman Balcony at the White House with President George W. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice.

Today, Bandar’s American-bred daughter, Her Royal Highness Princess Reema bint Bandar bin Sultan, is the kingdom’s ambassador to the U.S.

Bandar is media savvy. Both before and after the attacks, he appeared frequently on U.S. television to deflect criticism of Saudi Arabia. Here’s what Bandar told CNN’s Larry King Live just three weeks after the attacks:

“Well, it broke my heart when I found that there are some Saudis with them. I must say that we now are sure that at least half of what we thought, who we thought were Saudis are actually not. Stolen passports, it is stolen identities,” Bandar said.

Continues…

https://www.floridabulldog.org/2021/08/former-saudi-ambassador-prince-bandar-bin-sultan-refuses-to-testify-about-9-11/

Kid Berwyn

(14,797 posts)
3. And furthermore...
Sat Aug 21, 2021, 02:03 PM
Aug 2021

Excerpt…

Prince Bandar bin Sultan won’t talk

The period of discovery when depositions of Saudi fact witnesses could occur has ended. So Bandar won’t be testifying about what he knows. And what the witnesses who did answer questions had to say is secret because of a gag order imposed at the request of the FBI.

U.S. Magistrate Sarah Netburn specifically authorized the plaintiffs to depose Bandar. “But when we tried, he said no and KSA [Kingdom of Saudi Arabia] said he is no longer employed by the KSA government and that they cannot compel him,” said attorney Andrew Maloney, a partner in the New York law firm that’s helping to spearhead the litigation, Kreindler & Kreindler.

Snip…

Also deposed were a trio of Saudis who worked for Dallah Avco, a Saudi aviation company where suspected Saudi intelligence agent and befriender of two 9/11 hijackers Omar al-Bayoumi claimed to have worked, but did not, yet was paid for several years with Saudi government funds.

Why do the lawyers want to question Bandar under oath? Lots of reasons.

Perhaps the most intriguing one stems from the 2017 public release of 28 classified pages from Congress’s Joint Inquiry into 9/11 and co-written by the inquiry’s co-chairman, Sen. Bob Graham, D-FL. Graham had long called for their release, saying the FBI’s claim that national security might be compromised was bogus. Their release proved Graham correct.

Continues…

https://www.floridabulldog.org/2021/08/former-saudi-ambassador-prince-bandar-bin-sultan-refuses-to-testify-about-9-11/

DickKessler

(364 posts)
15. By the Saudi govt's logic, Jamal Khashoggi (among other dissidents) should've been left alone.
Sun Aug 22, 2021, 02:33 PM
Aug 2021

They weren’t employees of the KSA government, after all.

“he is no longer employed by the KSA government and that they cannot compel him”

Well isn’t that convenient for Bandar Bush!

Kid Berwyn

(14,797 posts)
17. Most convenient. It doesn't bring up how the crown considers them 'subjects.'
Sun Aug 22, 2021, 06:39 PM
Aug 2021

And thus, like all those trillions in petrodollars, property.



PS: A hearty welcome to DU, DickKessler!

GregariousGroundhog

(7,514 posts)
4. This is only half of the story
Sat Aug 21, 2021, 02:03 PM
Aug 2021

CIA Station Chief in Pakison, Robert Grenier, gave Mullah Osmani, the Taliban's second in command, three options 1) hand over Osama bin Laden to the United States, 2) allow the U.S. to come in and find bin Laden, or 3) assassinate or execute bin Laden themselves. The Taliban countered with an offer to turn bin Laden over to a neutral third party. Neither side budged, and the rest is history.

Kid Berwyn

(14,797 posts)
6. Thanks for the info on Grenier. Thing is, the offers above were before 911.
Sat Aug 21, 2021, 02:22 PM
Aug 2021



Former CIA agent Grenier on 15 years of war in Afghanistan: 'A never-ending struggle where there is no way of defeating our antagonists'

Deutsche Welle, 07.10.2016

Fifteen years after war broke out in Afghanistan, Robert L. Grenier, former CIA station chief in Pakistan, offered profound insights into strategic decisions the US government made in the early days of the conflict.

Grenier told DW that he feared from the start "we would ultimately end up in a kind of situation in which we currently find ourselves. A never-ending struggle where there is no way of defeating our antagonists, but where they too are incapable of winning and you just have a protracted struggle."
Asked about the failures of the military intervention that made Afghans view the US and NATO forces as occupiers rather than liberators, Grenier said: "One of the frustrations for those of us dealing with people back at our own headquarters both at CIA and at the Pentagon in particular was, that the people we were dealing with really did not understand very much about Afghanistan or about the dynamics between al-Qaeda and the Taliban for instance. And they tended to view things in very stark black and white terms."

Grenier added that after the fall of Kandahar in December 2001 "I thought that some effort should have been made to reach out to some elements within the Taliban leadership to provide them with assurance that there would be some future for them in Afghanistan. But there was absolutely no interest from the American side in doing that. At the time we did not realize how important an opportunity it was, or how grave the consequences of our failure to seize that opportunity would ultimately be. I think we missed a major opportunity at that point."

About negotiations with Taliban leader Mullah Omar's deputy, Mullah Osmani, Grenier said: "I tried to convince [Mullah Osmani] to move Mullah Omar aside and to seize power himself to do what needed to be done – both to bring Bin Laden and his key lieutenants to justice but also to save the Taliban movement." Grenier said the negotiations failed because "Mullah Omar had too much control over his own people, and there was no way that Mullah Omar could be convinced himself to turn over Bin Laden."

Continues…

https://www.dw.com/en/former-cia-agent-grenier-on-15-years-of-war-in-afghanistan-a-never-ending-struggle-where-there-is-no-way-of-defeating-our-antagonists/a-35991612



More on the story after 911:



Bush rejects Taliban offer to hand Bin Laden over

* Taliban demand evidence of Bin Laden's guilt
* Second week of airstrikes starts
* Taliban urges US to halt bombing


The Guardian Staff and agencies
Sun 14 Oct 2001

President George Bush rejected as "non-negotiable" an offer by the Taliban to discuss turning over Osama bin Laden if the United States ended the bombing in Afghanistan.

Returning to the White House after a weekend at Camp David, the president said the bombing would not stop, unless the ruling Taliban "turn [bin Laden] over, turn his cohorts over, turn any hostages they hold over." He added, "There's no need to discuss innocence or guilt. We know he's guilty". In Jalalabad, deputy prime minister Haji Abdul Kabir - the third most powerful figure in the ruling Taliban regime - told reporters that the Taliban would require evidence that Bin Laden was behind the September 11 terrorist attacks in the US, but added: "we would be ready to hand him over to a third country".

Snip…

Taliban 'ready to discuss' Bin Laden handover if bombing halts

The Taliban would be ready to discuss handing over Osama bin Laden to a neutral country if the US halted the bombing of Afghanistan, a senior Taliban official said today.

Afghanistan's deputy prime minister, Haji Abdul Kabir, told reporters that the Taliban would require evidence that Bin Laden was behind the September 11 terrorist attacks in the US.

"If the Taliban is given evidence that Osama bin Laden is involved" and the bombing campaign stopped, "we would be ready to hand him over to a third country", Mr Kabir added.

But it would have to be a state that would never "come under pressure from the United States", he said.

Continues…

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/oct/14/afghanistan.terrorism5

moondust

(19,958 posts)
5. I think I would have
Sat Aug 21, 2021, 02:06 PM
Aug 2021

taken bin Laden, made a global spectacle of him, and issued a dire warning to the Taliban that if they continue to allow terrorist gangs to thrive and pose a threat we will move to Plan B: reducing them to rubble.

Kid Berwyn

(14,797 posts)
7. That would have been the best course of action.
Sat Aug 21, 2021, 02:30 PM
Aug 2021

Instead of war, we conduct a police action. Arrest the suspects. Conduct an investigation. Analyze the facts. Make the charges public. Try the accused in a court of law. Determine guilt or innocence. Sentence the guilty.

With warmongers Bush-n-Cheney, Plan B was the only option from Day 1. Remember how they ignored Richard Clarke’s warnings in January 2001? They demoted the counterterrorism boss and ignored his warnings until after the CIA’s PDB, “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in the U.S.” in August, 2001.

JHB

(37,156 posts)
12. But Bush and the PNAC gallery sneered at the idea that non-state actors posed real threats
Sun Aug 22, 2021, 02:05 PM
Aug 2021

They jeered at Clinton for firing million-dollar cruise missiles at "a guy in a tent."

They thought he was jumping at shadows.

Like just about everything else they thought, they were wrong, disasterously wrong.

DickKessler

(364 posts)
14. And to the extent that any state actors were involved in 9/11, it was the KSA.
Sun Aug 22, 2021, 02:23 PM
Aug 2021

You know, that key part of the global influence of Big Oil and the military-industrial complex.

I’m sure that the Bush family or Dick Cheney had no dealings with Saudi Arabia…just like how Trump claims about himself and Saudi, or Russia. *sigh*

Kid Berwyn

(14,797 posts)
9. Taliban 'offered bin Laden trial before 9/11'
Sat Aug 21, 2021, 09:28 PM
Aug 2021

Al Jazeera remembered the history and brought it up a decade back.



Taliban ‘offered bin Laden trial before 9/11’

Former minister says group was prepared to see bin Laden put on trial prior to 9/11, but US was not interested.


By Mujib Mashal
Al Jazeera, 11 Sep 2011

The Taliban government in Afghanistan offered to present Osama bin Laden for a trial long before the attacks of September 11, 2001, but the US government showed no interest, according to a senior aide to the Taliban leader, Mullah Omar.

Wakil Ahmad Muttawakil, Taliban’s last foreign minister, told Al Jazeera in an exclusive interview that his government had made several proposals to the United States to present the al-Qaeda leader, considered the mastermind of the 2001 attacks, for trial for his involvement in plots targeting US facilities during the 1990s.

“Even before the [9/11] attacks, our Islamic Emirate had tried through various proposals to resolve the Osama issue. One such proposal was to set up a three-nation court, or something under the supervision of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference [OIC],” Muttawakil said.

“But the US showed no interest in it. They kept demanding we hand him over, but we had no relations with the US, no agreement of any sort. They did not recognise our government.”

Snip…

Robert Grenier, the CIA station chief in Pakistan at the time of 9/11, confirmed that such proposals had been made to US officials.

Grenier said the US considered the offers to bring in Bin Laden to trial a “ploy”.

Continues…

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2011/9/11/taliban-offered-bin-laden-trial-before-9

Kid Berwyn

(14,797 posts)
11. Miserable Failure loves oil.
Sun Aug 22, 2021, 01:46 PM
Aug 2021
Why Did US Invade Afghanistan, Anyway, When 9/11 Had Saudi Arabia Written All Over It?

Mark Karlin, editor BuzzFlash, Aug. 21, 2021

Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld attacked Afghanistan in October, 2001, but their real targets should have likely been Saudi Arabia and the secret intelligence agency (ISI) in Pakistan.

After all, Osama bin Laden and 15 of the 19 9/11 hijackers were Saudi Arabian, even though they initially trained in Afghanistan. Many analysts and surviving family members of 9/11 also argue that major funding for bin Laden, who came from a prominent and extremely wealthy Saudi family, was provided by members of the Saudi Royal Family. In fact, the “20th hijacker,” Zacarias Moussaoui, who was arrested prior to 9/11 and is currently in federal prison, claims that he has seen evidence of Saudi royal family involvement. Furthermore, survivors of 9/11 — who are suing Saudi Arabia — are currently pressuring President Biden to release classified evidence of alleged Saudi financial and other involvement or Biden will not be welcome at the 20th anniversary memorial of 9/11 next month.

In the days after 9/11, the Bush administration provided a plane for extended members of the Saudi royal family to leave the United States under cover of darkness, without FBI questioning and during a three day “no-fly” period, and Bush was very determined to deflect any blame for 9/11 from the Saudis. After all, there is all that oil to protect and keep flowing.

Bush was also, along with cover from Condi Rice, determined not to admit culpability for failing to stop the catastrophe. He said that he never received intelligence that Al Qaeda was determined to fly planes into buildings, even though in July of 2001, he stayed on a boat at a G-8 conference in Genoa, in part because just that scenario was feared as one of many possible terrorist attacks. He also didn’t mention until it was revealed three years later by Condi Rice that she and Bush had received a Presidential Daily Briefing, in August of 2001, entitled, “Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States.” (Bush infamously kicked out the August 6 briefer out of his Texas ranch, telling him (paraphrased): “Now that you’ve covered your ass, get going.”)

Yet, no one in the Bush administration made any effort to increase efforts to prevent hijackings, which might have prevented the 9/11 tragedy — or to get the CIA and FBI to work together on all the evidence of terrorists enrolled in US flight schools.

Continues…

https://buzzflash.com/articles/mark-karlin-why-did-us-invade-afghanistan-anyway-when-911-had-saudi-arabia-written-all-over-it

All of the above was discussed on DU at the time. Yet the nation’s mass media, like Smirko McCokespoon hisself, failed to connect the dots.

So. Here we are. Twenty years later.

DickKessler

(364 posts)
13. Bin Laden also could have been killed or captured at Tora Bora in Dec 01.
Sun Aug 22, 2021, 02:14 PM
Aug 2021

But Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and their neocon advisers didn’t provide the troops necessary to gey him. Instead they trusted the Pakistanis to seal the border, and cut off bin Laden’s escape…which obviously didn’t happen. Shocker!

The reason they didn’t want to send reinforcements at Tora Bora? They were “saving” the troops for Iraq. *facepalm*

crickets

(25,952 posts)
16. Reading through this thread, the horrified frustration of watching it happen in real time
Sun Aug 22, 2021, 04:11 PM
Aug 2021

all comes flooding back. Now is the perfect opportunity for the media to drag the whole sordid mess into the light of day, set the record straight, etc. But nooo. *sigh*

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How Bush Was Offered Bin ...