General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsClass Claims Symantec Uses 'Scareware'
Class Claims Symantec Uses 'Scareware'
SAN JOSE (CN) - Security software giant Symantec uses "scareware" to trick customers into buying its anti-virus programs, a class action claims in Federal Court.
Lead plaintiff James Gross claims: "Through a common deceptive scheme, Symantec uniformly defrauds consumers into purchasing the three products at issue in this lawsuit - PC Tools Registry Mechanic, PC Tools Performance Toolkit, and Norton Utilities (hereafter collectively referred to as the 'Scareware').
"First, Symantec represents to the consumer that the Scareware is capable of identifying and fixing a wide range of PC errors, privacy threats, and other computer problems. Next, to demonstrate the Scareware's value to the consumer, Symantec allows the user to download the software and perform a 'free diagnostic' scan, which purportedly detects whether any such problems exist on the individual's PC. Then, the Scareware reports, in alarmist fashion, that harmful errors and other threats exist on the user's PC. Finally, Symantec informs the consumer that a handful of these issues may be fixed for free, but the individual must purchase the product to fully remove the remaining so-called errors."
But, Gross says, "the Scareware does not conduct any actual diagnostic testing on the computer. Instead, Symantec intentionally designed its Scareware to invariably report, in an extremely ominous manner, that harmful errors, privacy risks, and other computer problems exist on the user's PC, regardless of the real condition of the consumer's computer. Furthermore, the Scareware does not, and cannot, provide the benefits promised by Symantec. Accordingly, consumers are duped into purchasing software that does not function as advertised, and in fact, has very little (if any) utility."
http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/01/12/42979.htm
d_r
(6,907 posts)My great Aunt panicked and bought their service.
tridim
(45,358 posts)Symantic should be SHUT DOWN, along with all the other scareware companies for breaking the law. Fines don't do anything.
d_r
(6,907 posts)I wasn't thinking so much of her getting the money back as I was of them being stopped from doing it.
hunter
(38,310 posts)Microsoft made the insecure operating systems and let the vermin in. From the beginning they ought to have been the ones to clean up the mess. For far too many years Microsoft insisted it wasn't their problem.
That's how we got scaremongers like Symantec in the first place.
There are two kinds of anti-virus and security software companies: those that succeed by writing quality software and establishing honest reputations, and those that "succeed" by high pressure fear mongering: "TERMITES ARE EATING YOUR HOUSE!!! COCKROACHES ARE SPREADING DISEASE!!! YOU COULD BE NEXT!!! GIVE US MONEY NOW!!!"
Symantec is definitely in the second category. That company's core talent isn't programming and keeping up with the latest threats, it's marketing.
frylock
(34,825 posts)kaspersky ftw.
Response to hunter (Reply #4)
Mosby This message was self-deleted by its author.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Didn't stop anything. My personal opinion is that Norton is about as useful as a screen door on a submarine.