Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGroup asks DC court panel to investigate DOJ official who peddled false Trump election claims
Jeffrey Clark needs to be disbarred
Link to tweet
A group of legal heavyweights on Tuesday asked the disciplinary panel of the D.C. Court of Appeals to investigate a former Department of Justice (DOJ) official who allegedly sought to use his official position in the federal government to overturn former President Trumps election defeat.
In a 15-page ethics complaint, the group said former DOJ official Jeffrey Clark should face disciplinary action over his alleged attempt in late December to subvert the 2020 election result in part by proposing that he and two other top DOJ officials send letters to state leaders, including those in Georgia, making the unfounded claim that the department identified concerns that may have impacted the outcome of the election in multiple states.
A central allegation in the complaint is that Clarks plan amounted to an attempt to interfere with the administration of justice by seeking to derail Congress Jan. 6 certification of Bidens win. Such tampering is prohibited by the Districts ethics rules for lawyers.
Unlike other Trump-allied attorneys, some of whom have had their law licenses suspended or been hit with court sanctions, Clark so far hBut the complaint alleges that Clark's conduct as a DOJ official was even more egregious than that of sanctioned pro-Trump lawyers like Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell and Lin Wood, whose efforts centered on court challenges and right-wing media appearances.
[M]r. Clark made false statements about the integrity of the election in a concerted effort to disseminate an official statement of the United States Department of Justice that the election results in multiple states were unreliable, reads the complaint. While his conduct mirrored that of other lawyers who have been sanctioned for false statements, they operated on a considerably more dangerous scale with commensurately greater risk to our democracy.as faced no repercussions.
In a 15-page ethics complaint, the group said former DOJ official Jeffrey Clark should face disciplinary action over his alleged attempt in late December to subvert the 2020 election result in part by proposing that he and two other top DOJ officials send letters to state leaders, including those in Georgia, making the unfounded claim that the department identified concerns that may have impacted the outcome of the election in multiple states.
A central allegation in the complaint is that Clarks plan amounted to an attempt to interfere with the administration of justice by seeking to derail Congress Jan. 6 certification of Bidens win. Such tampering is prohibited by the Districts ethics rules for lawyers.
Unlike other Trump-allied attorneys, some of whom have had their law licenses suspended or been hit with court sanctions, Clark so far hBut the complaint alleges that Clark's conduct as a DOJ official was even more egregious than that of sanctioned pro-Trump lawyers like Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell and Lin Wood, whose efforts centered on court challenges and right-wing media appearances.
[M]r. Clark made false statements about the integrity of the election in a concerted effort to disseminate an official statement of the United States Department of Justice that the election results in multiple states were unreliable, reads the complaint. While his conduct mirrored that of other lawyers who have been sanctioned for false statements, they operated on a considerably more dangerous scale with commensurately greater risk to our democracy.as faced no repercussions.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 418 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Group asks DC court panel to investigate DOJ official who peddled false Trump election claims (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
Oct 2021
OP
One would hope the DOJ was cleaning up its own ranks. But we can't know. And apparently
Scrivener7
Oct 2021
#1
Scrivener7
(50,944 posts)1. One would hope the DOJ was cleaning up its own ranks. But we can't know. And apparently
we're not allowed to ask.
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,111 posts)2. This asshole left the DOJ a long time ago
The DOJ and its Inspector General have no hurisdiction over him. The IG cannot compell this asshole to testify in an investigation