Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(130,757 posts)
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 10:09 PM Oct 2021

Appeals court puts temporary hold on judge's order blocking Texas 6-week abortion ban

A federal appeals court on Friday night put a temporary hold on a judge's order blocking Texas' six-week abortion ban.

The 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals granted Texas' request for an administrative stay of the order. Texas had filed the request Friday afternoon, after US District Judge Robert Pitman issued a sweeping order earlier in the week blocking the law at the request of the US Justice Department, which had brought a legal challenge last month.

On Friday night, the New Orleans-based appellate court also asked for the Justice Department to respond by 5 p.m. local time on Tuesday to a request by Texas that Pitman's order be frozen while its appeal is considered by the 5th Circuit.

On the three-judge appellate panel considering the state's request was Judge Carl Stewart, a Clinton appointee; Judge Catharina Haynes, a George W. Bush appointee; and Judge James Ho, a Trump appointee.

The fight over Pitman's order could ultimately end up before the Supreme Court, which rejected an earlier request from abortion clinics that it block the law. . .

To get around this unusual enforcement mechanism, Pitman's order included prohibitions on state court officials, including judges, from proceeding with state court lawsuits filed against clinics and others accused of violating the ban.

Texas, in its Friday request with the 5th Circuit, said Pitman's order violated precedent in how it targeted state courts, as well as private individuals seeking to bring enforcement litigation under the abortion ban.

"There is no precedent for the district court's injunction; it grossly and irreparably interferes with Texas state-court operations," Texas wrote in the filing. "It also places state courts and their employees under imminent threat of contempt based on the actions of third parties that they cannot control.">>>

https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/08/politics/texas-abortion-appeal/index.html

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Appeals court puts temporary hold on judge's order blocking Texas 6-week abortion ban (Original Post) elleng Oct 2021 OP
The most right wing appeals court in the land. gab13by13 Oct 2021 #1
Here we go. BeckyDem Oct 2021 #2
I hate Abbott. How many women total walked last week in the Women's March... IcyPeas Oct 2021 #3
'Powerless' is right. elleng Oct 2021 #4
Was it unanimous? Crepuscular Oct 2021 #5

gab13by13

(21,264 posts)
1. The most right wing appeals court in the land.
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 10:26 PM
Oct 2021

The people who managed to get abortions these past 2 days and their providers will now get sued by the Bounty hunters.

Only in America.

IcyPeas

(21,842 posts)
3. I hate Abbott. How many women total walked last week in the Women's March...
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 10:52 PM
Oct 2021

Will it... can it... does it change anything? Makes you feel so powerless.

Sorry, just feeling down tonight. ☹

Crepuscular

(1,057 posts)
5. Was it unanimous?
Sat Oct 9, 2021, 09:59 AM
Oct 2021

The article didn't say, or if it did I may have missed it but was the decision to place a hold a 3 - 0 vote? Meaning did the Clinton appointee vote for the hold along with the Bush and Trump appointee's?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Appeals court puts tempor...