The Methods of Moral Panic Journalism
https://michaelhobbes.substack.com/p/moral-panic-journalism
During the 1990s, the media convinced Americans that frivolous lawsuits were out of control.
The canonical example was the 1994 McDonalds hot coffee case. In the mythic version, a woman spilled coffee on herself while driving, received minor injuries and then got rich by suing the fast food chain that sold it to her. In reality, 79-year-old Stella Liebeck wasnt driving, suffered third-degree burns over 10% of her body and only decided to sue after McDonalds refused to pay for her medical care. Liebecks jury award of $2.9 million made headlines, but the punitive damages were almost immediately knocked down to $640,000. She ended up settling with McDonalds for even less.
Looking back nearly 30 years later, the most remarkable thing about the McDonalds case is that all of these debunking details were available at the time. The very first AP story about the case noted Liebecks severe burns and McDonalds refusal to pay damages. Within weeks of the verdict, the Wall St. Journal published an A1 story in which jurors said they had initially been skeptical of Liebecks motives, but changed their minds after learning that McDonalds sold its coffee so close to boiling that it had caused at least 700 other severe burn cases in the previous decade.
The real story of the McDonalds case was always available, it just didnt matter. By the time the Liebeck verdict came down, Americans had already spent nearly a decade hearing about ambulance-chasing lawyers, jackpot justice awards and the debilitating tort tax on American businesses. As early as 1986, Ronald Reagan speeches included a laugh line about a woman who sued her doctor after a CAT scan robbed her of her psychic powers. (In reality, the woman had an allergic reaction to a surgical dye, suffered severe headaches for the rest of her life and had her lawsuit thrown out. She never received a dime.)
*snip*