Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe New Lost Cause
Republicans are holding up the January 6 insurrectionan effort to overthrow the American governmentas the high-water mark of patriotism.https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/10/donald-trumps-new-lost-cause-centers-january-6/620407/
One of my favorite things about covering political rallies is that they typically start with a recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance. For anyone above school age, occasions to recite the pledge with a large group of people are irregular, and the ritual serves as a good reminder of what politics is about at its best, no matter how divisive what follows might be.
The pledge at a rally for the Republican gubernatorial candidate Glenn Youngkin in Virginia on Wednesday night was different. At the beginning of the event, which Steve Bannon hosted and Donald Trump phoned into, an emcee called an attendee up onstage and announced, Shes carrying an American flag that was carried at the peaceful rally with Donald J. Trump on January 6. Attendees then said the pledge while facing the flag. (Youngkin didnt attend, and later tepidly criticized the moment.)
This is a bizarre subversion. The pledge affirms allegiance to the republic, indivisible and offering justice to all. This flag was carried at a rally that became an attack on the Constitution itself: an attempt to overthrow the government, divide the country, and effect extrajudicial punishment. Elevating this banner to a revered relic captures the troubling transformation of the events of January 6 into a mytha New Lost Cause. This mythology has many of the trappings of its neo-Confederate predecessor, which Trump also employed for political gain: a martyr cult, claims of anti-liberty political persecution, and veneration of artifacts.
Most of all, the New Lost Cause, like the old one, seeks to convert a shameful catastrophe into a celebration of the valor and honor of the culprits and portray those who attacked the country as the true patriots. But lost causes have a pernicious tendency to be less lost than we might hope. Just as neo-Confederate revisionism shaped racial violence and oppression after the war, Trumps New Lost Cause poses a continuing peril to the hope of one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
snip
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 970 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The New Lost Cause (Original Post)
Celerity
Oct 2021
OP
Silent3
(15,191 posts)1. Personally, I find the pledge creepy
Especially since it's expressly to the flag first, and "to the Republic, for which it stands" secondarily.
And I definitely do not care for the "under God" version.
Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)2. K&R
Kid Berwyn
(14,870 posts)3. Why do they hate America?
They should leave.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)4. If it did signal a shift to a now-sacred "lost cause" that'd be good,
not wonderful as the author points out, but we can't expect 40 million patriotic victims of Democratic election theft to just stop caring about their democracy.
Maddow's show last night pointed out a few indicators that some insurrectionists may be feeling at least a bit on the ropes. John Eastman is now claiming his memo didn't advocate subverting the election at all, "that'd be crazy." Of course all legal problems will go away once they take over, but until then...